Asked
and Answered I read your explanation on impeachment, and I
have two questions:
1) If the House votes for
impeachment, thus moving the matter to the Senate for
trial, who acts as prosecutor (The House Judicial
Committee?) and who makes up the defense (does the
accused have a right to have his attorneys present?
2) Can the defendant claim
a Constitutional defense (ie-5th Amendment) even though
this argument hasn't been raised in the previous
inquiries?
--Venturi, CA
In the case of a
Presidential impeachment, it is likely that the
entire Senate, rather than just a committee, would
hear the evidence presented by a small group of members of the House
Representatives, referred to as "managers."
The managers act as prosecutors, with the power to
call and cross-examine witnesses. Senators may also
question witness, although the questions are
presented through the Presiding Officer. Opening and
closing arguments are allowed for both sides,
although the House is allowed the last word.
As for defense
counsel, the impeached officer may have an attorney
present to file motions, objections, requests,
applications, and to cross-examine witnesses. In
fact, the officer's presence is not required at all.
The writ of summons specifies a fixed time and place
to file an answer to the charges, but this may be
done by attorney. Even if an answer is not filed, the
trial continues on an automatic plea of "not
guilty." The Senate may not compel the officer
to testify as a witness, nor take the officer into
custody. However, the officer is entitled to testify
on his or her own behalf. The rights of the officer on the stand
are uncertain. By taking the stand voluntarily, it may
be presumed that the officer "opened the door" to
any questions and forfeited any defenses other than
lack of knowledge. A more complex answer may be that
Constitutional defenses do not apply on the floor of
the Senate. Impeachment is not a criminal proceeding,
and thus, may not be affected by the right against
self-incrimination just as in civil proceedings are not.
Finally, other than limitations specifically
imposed by the Constitution, such as the two-thirds majority rule,
the impeachment process may lie outside more general Constitutional
provisions just as it lies outside judicial review. In Senate
Impeachment Rule VI, the Senate "shall have the
power to compel the attendance of witnesses, to
enforce obedience to its orders, writs, precepts, and
judgments..." No mention is made of witness
rights or privileges.
Suggestions or
Comments?
This collection of material on the law of
impeachment is a work in progress. If you have
suggestions of additional material or sources, comments,
or feedback of any kind, please email the
webmaster!
Prepared by Brian
J. Henchey for the Legal Information Institute
|
|
|
Updated
September 28, 1998
Impeachment
Topics
References and
Suggested Readings
- Textual
Sources
- Michael J.
Gerhardt, The Federal Impeachment
Process: A Constitutional and Historical
Analysis, Princeton Univ. Press
(1996)
- William
Rehnquist, Grand Inquests: The
Historic Impeachments of Justice Samuel
Chase and President Andrew Johnson
(1992)
- Gene
Smith, High Crimes and Misdemeanors,
McGraw Hill (1985)
- Peter
Hoffer and N.E. Hull, Impeachment in
America 1635-1805, Yale Univ. Press
(1984)
- Thomas
Kingsley, The Federal Impeachment
Process: A Bibliographic Guide to English
and American Precedence, Cornell
University Libraries (1974)
- Bob
Woodward and Carl Bernstein, The
Final Days, Touchstone Books (2d ed.
1994)
|