Skip to main content

LABOR

Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Corp. (09-834)

Oral argument: Oct. 13, 2010

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Oct. 15, 2009)

LABOR, FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, ANTI-RETALIATION

Petitioner Kevin Kasten sued his employer, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Corp., alleging that Saint-Gobain terminated his employment in retaliation for his oral complaints regarding the location of the company's time clocks. Kasten alleges that Section 215(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees who make oral complaints from employer retaliation. However, Saint-Gobain asserts that Section 215(a)(3) only protects written complaints made to governmental authorities. The Seventh Circuit held that Section 215(a)(3) only protects written employee complaints. The Supreme Court’s decision will affect several aspects of the employer-employee relationship, including informal dispute resolution procedures in the workplace and employees’ abilities to raise their grievances without fear of retaliation.

Syndicate content