10 CFR 2.1506 - Written statements and submission of information.
Title 10 published on 2013-01-01
no entries appear in the Federal Register after this date.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
Title 10 published on 2013-01-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 10 CFR 2 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-10117 RIN 3150-AI30 NRC-2009-0044 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Proposed rule. Submit comments by July 17, 2013. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. 10 CFR Part 2 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend its regulations to streamline its process for addressing petitions for rulemaking (PRMs). The proposed amendments are intended to improve transparency and make the PRM process more efficient and effective.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-07960 RIN 3150-AJ24 NRC-2013-0050 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Submit comments by July 5, 2013. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is only able to ensure consideration of comments received on or before this date. 10 CFR Part 2 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) to begin the process of potentially amending its regulations to change the interlocutory appeals process for certain adjudicatory decisions. The NRC seeks public comment on these potential changes to the interlocutory appeals process.