14 CFR 121, Appendix F to Part 121 - Proficiency Check Requirements
| Maneuvers/Procedures | Required | Permitted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulated instrument conditions | Inflight | Visual simulator | Nonvisual simulator | Training device | Waiver provisions of § 121.441(d) | |
| The procedures and maneuvers set forth in this appendix must be performed in a manner that satisfactorily demonstrates knowledge and skill with respect to— | ||||||
| (1) The airplane, its systems and components; | ||||||
| (2) Proper control of airspeed, configuration, direction, altitude, and attitude in accordance with procedures and limitations contained in the approved Airplane Flight Manual, the certificate holder's operations Manual, check lists, or other approved material appropriate to the airplane type; and | ||||||
| (3) Compliance with approach, ATC, or other applicable procedures | ||||||
| I. Preflight: | ||||||
| (a) Equipment examination (oral or written). As part of the practical test the equipment examination must be closely coordinated with, and related to, the flight maneuvers portion but may not be given during the flight maneuvers portion. The equipment examination must cover— | B | |||||
| (1) Subjects requiring a practical knowledge of the airplane, its powerplants, systems, components, operational, and performance factors; | ||||||
| (2) Normal, abnormal, and emergency procedures, and the operations and limitations relating thereto; and | ||||||
| (3) The appropriate provisions of the approved Airplane Flight Manual | ||||||
| The person conducting the check may accept, as equal to this equipment test, an equipment test given to the pilot in the certificate holder's ground school within the preceding 6 calendar months | ||||||
| (b) Preflight inspection. The pilot must— | B | B* | ||||
| (1) Conduct an actual visual inspection of the exterior and interior of the airplane, locating each item and explaining briefly the purpose for inspecting it; and | ||||||
| (2) Demonstrate the use of the prestart check list, appropriate control system checks, starting procedures, radio and electronic equipment checks, and the selection of proper navigation and communications radio facilities and frequencies prior to flight | ||||||
| Except for flight checks required by § 121.424(d)(2), an approved pictorial means that realistically portrays the location and detail of preflight inspection items and provides for the portrayal of abnormal conditions may be substituted for the preflight inspection. If a flight engineer is a required flight crewmember for the particular type airplane, the visual inspection may be waived under § 121.441(d) | ||||||
|
Code of Federal Regulations
- Page 269
|
||||||
| (c) Taxiing. This maneuver includes taxiing (in the case of a second in command proficiency check to the extent practical from the second in command crew position), sailing, or docking procedures in compliance with instructions issued by the appropriate traffic control authority or by the person conducting the checks | B | |||||
| (d) Powerplant checks. As appropriate to the airplane type | B | |||||
| II. Takeoff: | ||||||
| (a) Normal. One normal takeoff which, for the purpose of this maneuver, begins when the airplane is taxied into position on the runway to be used | B* | |||||
| (b) Instrument. One takeoff with instrument conditions simulated at or before reaching an altitude of 100′ above the airport elevation | B | B* | ||||
| (c) Crosswind. One crosswind takeoff, if practicable, under the existing meteorological, airport, and traffic conditions | B* | |||||
| Requirements (a) and (c) may be combined, and requirements (a), (b), and (c) may be combined if (b) is performed inflight | ||||||
| #(d) Powerplant failure. One takeoff with a simulated failure of the most critical powerplant— | B | |||||
| (1) At a point after V 1 and before V 2 that in the judgment of the person conducting the check is appropriate to the airplane type under the prevailing conditions; | ||||||
| (2) At a point as close as possible after V 1 when V 1 and V 2 or V 1 and V r are identical; or | ||||||
| (3) At the appropriate speed for non-transport category airplanes | ||||||
| In an airplane group with aft fuselage-mounted engines this maneuver may be performed in a non-visual simulator | ||||||
| (e) Rejected. A rejected takeoff may be performed in an airplane during a normal takeoff run after reaching a reasonable speed determined by giving due consideration to aircraft characteristics, runway length, surface conditions, wind direction and velocity, brake heat energy, and any other pertinent factors that may adversely affect safety or the airplane | B* | B | ||||
| III. Instrument procedures: | ||||||
| (a) Area departure and area arrival. During each of these maneuvers the applicant must— | B | B | B* | |||
| (1) Adhere to actual or simulated ATC clearances (including assigned radials); and | ||||||
| (2) Properly use available navigation facilities | ||||||
| Either area arrival or area departure, but not both, may be waived under § 121.441(d) | ||||||
| (b) Holding. This maneuver includes entering, maintaining, and leaving holding patterns. It may be performed in connection with either area departure or area arrival | B | B | B | |||
| (c) ILS and other instrument approaches. There must be the following: | ||||||
| (1) At least one normal ILS approach | B | B | ||||
| (2) At least one manually controlled ILS approach with a simulated failure of one powerplant. The simulated failure should occur before initiating the final approach course and must continue to touchdown or through the missed approach procedure | B | |||||
| (3) At least one nonprecision approach procedure that is representative of the nonprecision approach procedures that the certificate holder is likely to use | B | B | ||||
| (4) Demonstration of at least one nonprecision approach procedure on a letdown aid other than the approach procedure performed under subparagraph (3) of this paragraph that the certificate holder is approved to use. If performed in a training device, the procedures must be observed by a check pilot or an approved instructor | B | B | ||||
|
Code of Federal Regulations
- Page 270
|
||||||
| Each instrument approach must be performed according to any procedures and limitations approved for the approach facility used. The instrument approach begins when the airplane is over the initial approach fix for the approach procedure being used (or turned over to the final approach controller in the case of GCA approach) and ends when the airplane touches down on the runway or when transition to a missed approach configuration is completed. Instrument conditions need not be simulated below 100′ above touchdown zone elevation | ||||||
| (d) Circling approaches. If the certificate holder is approved for circling minimums below 1000-3, at least one circling approach must be made under the following conditions— | B* | B* | ||||
| (1) The portion of the approach to the authorized minimum circling approach altitude must be made under simulated instrument conditions | B | |||||
| (2) The approach must be made to the authorized minimum circling approach altitude followed by a change in heading and the necessary maneuvering (by visual reference) to maintain a flight path that permits a normal landing on a runway at least 90° from the final approach course of the simulated instrument portion of the approach | ||||||
| (3) The circling approach must be performed without excessive maneuvering, and without exceeding the normal operating limits of the airplane. The angle of bank should not exceed 30° | ||||||
| If local conditions beyond the control of the pilot prohibit the maneuver or prevent it from being performed as required, it may be waived as provided in § 121.441(d): Provided, however, That the maneuver may not be waived under this provision for two successive proficiency checks. The circling approach maneuver is not required for a second-in-command if the certificate holder's manual prohibits a second-in-command from performing a circling approach in operations under this part | ||||||
| (e) Missed approach | ||||||
| (1) Each pilot must perform at least one missed approach from an ILS approach | B* | |||||
| (2) Each pilot in command must perform at least one additional missed approach | P* | |||||
| A complete approved missed approach procedure must be accomplished at least once. At the discretion of the person conducting the check a simulated powerplant failure may be required during any of the missed approaches. These maneuvers may be performed either independently or in conjunction with maneuvers required under Sections III or V of this appendix. At least one missed approach must be performed in flight | ||||||
| IV. Inflight Maneuvers: | ||||||
| (a) Steep turns. At least one steep turn in each direction must be performed. Each steep turn must involve a bank angle of 45° with a heading change of at least 180° but not more than 360° | P | P | P | |||
| (b) Approaches to stalls. For the purpose of this maneuver the required approach to a stall is reached when there is a perceptible buffet or other response to the initial stall entry. Except as provided below there must be at least three approaches to stalls as follows: | B | B | B* | |||
| (1) One must be in the takeoff configuration (except where the airplane uses only a zero-flap takeoff configuration) | ||||||
|
Code of Federal Regulations
- Page 271
|
||||||
| (2) One in a clean configuration | ||||||
| (3) One in a landing configuration | ||||||
| At the discretion of the person conducting the check, one approach to a stall must be performed in one of the above configurations while in a turn with the bank angle between 15° and 30°. Two out of the three approaches required by this paragraph may be waived | ||||||
| If the certificate holder is authorized to dispatch or flight release the airplane with a stall warning device inoperative the device may not be used during this maneuver | ||||||
| (c) Specific flight characteristics. Recovery from specific flight characteristics that are peculiar to the airplane type | B | B | ||||
| (d) Powerplant failures. In addition to specific requirements for maneuvers with simulated powerplant failures, the person conducting the check may require a simulated powerplant failure at any time during the check | B | |||||
| V. Landings and Approaches to Landings: | ||||||
| Notwithstanding the authorizations for combining and waiving maneuvers and for the use of a simulator, at least two actual landings (one to a full stop) must be made for all pilot-in-command and initial second-in-command proficiency checks. Landings, and approaches to landings must include the following, but more than one type may be combined where appropriate: | ||||||
| Landings and approaches to landings must include the types listed below, but more than one type may be combined where appropriate: | ||||||
| (a) Normal landing | B | |||||
| (b) Landing in sequence from an ILS instrument approach except that if circumstances beyond the control of the pilot prevent an actual landing, the person conducting the check may accept an approach to a point where in his judgment a landing to a full stop could have been made | B* | |||||
| (c) Crosswind landing, if practical under existing meteorological, airport, and traffic conditions | B* | |||||
| (d) Maneuvering to a landing with simulated powerplant failure as follows: | ||||||
| (1) In the case of 3-engine airplanes, maneuvering to a landing with an approved procedure that approximates the loss of two powerplants (center and one outboard engine); or | B* | |||||
| (2) In the case of other multiengine airplanes, maneuvering to a landing with a simulated failure of 50 percent of available powerplants, with the simulated loss of power on one side of the airplane | B* | |||||
| Notwithstanding the requirements of subparagraphs (d) (1) and (2) of this paragraph, in a proficiency check for other than a pilot-in-command, the simulated loss of power may be only the most critical powerplant. However, if a pilot satisfies the requirements of subparagraphs (d) (1) or (2) of this paragraph in a visual simulator, he also must maneuver in flight to a landing with a simulated failure of the most critical powerplant. In addition, a pilot-in-command may omit the maneuver required by subparagraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this paragraph during a required proficiency check or simulator course of training if he satisfactorily performed that maneuver during the preceding proficiency check, or during the preceding approved simulator course of training under the observation of a check airman, whichever was completed later | ||||||
|
Code of Federal Regulations
- Page 272
|
||||||
| (e) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, if the certificate holder is approved for circling minimums below 1000-3, a landing under simulated circling approach conditions. However, when performed in an airplane, if circumstances beyond the control of the pilot prevent a landing, the person conducting the check may accept an approach to a point where, in his judgment, a landing to a full stop could have been made | B* | |||||
| #(f) A rejected landing, including a normal missed approach procedure, that is rejected approximately 50′ over the runway and approximately over the runway threshold. This maneuver may be combined with instrument, circling, or missed approach procedures, but instrument conditions need not be simulated below 100 feet above the runway | B | |||||
| VI. Normal and Abnormal Procedures: | ||||||
| Each applicant must demonstrate the proper use of as many of the systems and devices listed below as the person conducting the check finds are necessary to determine that the person being checked has a practical knowledge of the use of the systems and devices appropriate to the airplane type: | ||||||
| (a) Anti-icing and de-icing systems | B | |||||
| (b) Auto-pilot systems | B | |||||
| (c) Automatic or other approach aid systems | B | |||||
| (d) Stall warning devices, stall avoidance devices, and stability augmentation devices | B | |||||
| (e) Airborne radar devices | B | |||||
| (f) Any other systems, devices, or aids available | B | |||||
| (g) Hydraulic and electrical system failures and malfunctions | B | |||||
| (h) Landing gear and flap systems failure or malfunction | B | |||||
| (i) Failure of navigation or communications equipment | B | |||||
| VII. Emergency Procedures: | ||||||
| Each applicant must demonstrate the proper emergency procedures for as many of the emergency situations listed below as the person conducting the check finds are necessary to determine that the person being checked has an adequate knowledge of, and ability to perform, such procedure: | ||||||
| (a) Fire in flight | B | |||||
| (b) Smoke control | B | |||||
| (c) Rapid decompression | B | |||||
| (d) Emergency descent | B | |||||
| (e) Any other emergency procedures outlined in the appropriate approved Airplane Flight Manual | B | |||||
Title 14 published on 2012-01-01
The following are only the Rules published in the Federal Register after the published date of Title 14.
For a complete list of all Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices view the Rulemaking tab.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-05083 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Clarification. 14 CFR Parts 117 and 121 The FAA published a final rule on January 4, 2012, that amends the existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members. Since then, the FAA has received numerous questions about the new flight, duty, and rest rule. This is a response to those questions.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-03559 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical correction. Effective date: The effective date of a final rule correction published in the Federal Register of February 6, 2013 (78 FR 8361), is corrected from January 14, 2014, to January 4, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the effective date of a final rule correction for flightcrew member duty and rest requirements published on February 6, 2013, that required technical corrections in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule. The correct effective date of the rule should read January 4, 2014.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-02504 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical correction. Effective January 14, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule published on January 4, 2012. In that rule, the FAA amended its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating certain domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. This document corrects several issues requiring a technical correction in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-01695 RIN 2120-AK14 Docket No. FAA-2011-0186 Amendment Nos. 121-362 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. This final rule is effective March 29, 2013. 14 CFR Part 121 This action adds termination criteria and an expiration date to Special Federal Aviation Regulation 111, which temporarily authorizes variances from existing standards related to the provisioning of supplemental oxygen inside lavatories. This action is necessitated by the publication of Airworthiness Directive 2012-11-09, which mandates actions that restore supplemental oxygen to lavatories.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-29941 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Availability of Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis. Comments are due February 11, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119 and 121 The FAA is issuing an Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis of its final rule amending its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certain certificate holders and their flightcrew members. That document may be found in the docket listed above. The Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis serves to provide more detail on the potential impacts the final rule would have on cargo-only operations. In addition, the Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis provides expanded discussion of the methodology and information sources used in the original Regulatory Impact Analysis, corrects some reporting of results and minor calculation errors present in that document, and presents sensitivity analysis on key assumptions used in the analysis.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-25412 RIN 2120-AK18 Docket No. FAA-2012-0928 Amdt. No. 121-361 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. Effective October 31, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 This action amends the FAA's rules for permitting limited use of portable oxygen concentrator systems on board aircraft, to allow for the use of additional portable oxygen concentrator (POC) devices on board aircraft, provided certain conditions in the SFAR are met. This action is necessary to allow all POC devices deemed acceptable by the FAA for use in air commerce to be available to the traveling public in need of oxygen therapy. Passengers will be able to carry these devices on board the aircraft and use them with the approval of the aircraft operator.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-22090 RIN 2120-AI05 Docket No. FAA-2006-24281 Amendment Nos. 121-360A, 129-51A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment; correction. This corrective action becomes effective September 7, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 121 and 129 The FAA is correcting a technical amendment published May 24, 2012 to a final rule published November 15, 2010. The final rule required design approval holders of certain existing airplanes and all applicants for type certificates of future transport category airplanes to establish a limit of validity of the engineering data that supports the structural maintenance program (hereinafter referred to as LOV). It also required that operators of any affected airplane incorporate the LOV into the maintenance program for that airplane. The technical amendment to the final rule was issued to correct errors, but within its publication, it contained inadvertent errors due to pagination in two tables. This document corrects the errors in those tables.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-22095 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0429 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of FAA Grant of Exemption No. 10611 The exemption became effective on August 28, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 This document contains a summary of the agency's decision on a petition for exemption. The purpose of the document is to improve the public's awareness and inform affected operators of the FAA's decision.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-14280 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0486 Amdt. No. 121-359 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective June 12, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 The “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012,” enacted on February 14, 2012, in Section 305 of the Act, removed the line check performance evaluation requirements for pilots over 60 years of age that applied to air carriers engaged in part 121 operations. This technical amendment conforms to the FAA's regulations as a result of the Act.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-12658 RIN 2120-AI05 Docket No. FAA-2006-24281 Amendment Nos. 26-6, 121-360, 129-51 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective May 24, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 26, 121, and 129 The FAA is correcting a final rule published on November 15, 2010. That rule required design approval holders of certain existing airplanes and all applicants for type certificates of future transport category airplanes to establish a limit of validity of the engineering data that supports the structural maintenance program (hereinafter referred to as LOV). It also required that operators of any affected airplane incorporate the LOV into the maintenance program for that airplane. This document corrects errors in codified text of that document.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-11592 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1A, 119-16A, 121-357A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; correction. The effective date for the rule published January 4, 2012, at 77 FR 330, is corrected to January 4, 2014. The corrections in this document are effective January 4, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule published on January 4, 2012. In that rule, the FAA amended its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating certain domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. This document corrects the effective date and several errors in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-7739 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of procedures for submitting clarifying questions. You must submit your clarifying questions in writing using the procedures outlined below by June 4, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 117 and 121 The FAA published a final rule on January 4, 2012 that amends the existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members. Since then, the FAA has received questions from stakeholders concerning the provisions of the final rule. In response to these questions, the FAA is issuing this document, which announces the procedures for submitting clarifying questions to the final rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-4571 RIN 2120-AJ92 Docket No. FAA-2011-0186 Amdt. Nos. 21-94, 25-133, 121-354, 129-50 SFAR 111 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Interim final rule; disposition of comments. 14 CFR Parts 21, 25, 121, and 129 On March 8, 2011, the FAA published an interim final rule, request for comments (Amendment Nos. 21-94, 25-133, 121-354, 129-50; SFAR 111) on security considerations for lavatory oxygen systems (77 FR 12550). The interim final rule addresses a security vulnerability and is needed so the affected airplanes can continue operating until the non-compliance to airworthiness standards and operating rules is resolved. We sought public comment on the interim final rule even though it became effective upon publication. This action responds to the public comments the FAA received.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-1830 RIN Docket No. FAA-2011-1343 Amdt. No. 121-358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective January 27, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 The FAA is amending regulations relating to operating rules for FAA approved portable oxygen concentrators (POC) onboard aircraft. This document updates the names of two manufacturers of approved POCs listed in the Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR).
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2011-33078 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. Effective January 14, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 This rule amends the FAA's existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating under the domestic, flag, and supplemental operations rules. The rule recognizes the universality of factors that lead to fatigue in most individuals and regulates these factors to ensure that flightcrew members in passenger operations do not accumulate dangerous amounts of fatigue. Fatigue threatens aviation safety because it increases the risk of pilot error that could lead to an accident. This risk is heightened in passenger operations because of the additional number of potentially impacted individuals. The new requirements eliminate the current distinctions between domestic, flag and supplemental passenger operations. The rule provides different requirements based on the time of day, whether an individual is acclimated to a new time zone, and the likelihood of being able to sleep under different circumstances.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
Title 14 published on 2012-01-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 14 CFR 121 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-07375 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-1239 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of Draft Interpretation. Comments must be received on or before May 2, 2013. 14 CFR Part 121 This action provides interested persons with the opportunity to comment on the FAA's draft interpretation regarding nonstop international supplemental operations scheduled for longer than 12 hours. Additionally, this draft interpretation discusses the appropriate international flight time limitations that would apply to the operation. As discussed in the draft interpretation, the FAA finds that the operation of such flights would be precluded under the flight time limitations of the “U.S. mainland rules” found in the supplemental flight and duty rules. However, the operation could be conducted under the “international rules” provisions of our regulations.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-05791 RIN 2120-AJ43 Docket No. FAA-2009-0675 Amendment No. 121-363 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective March 13, 2013. 14 CFR Part 121 The FAA is correcting a final rule published on August 22, 2011 (76 FR 52241). In that rule, the FAA amended its regulations to create new operating rules for flight in icing conditions. This document corrects an error in the amendatory language of the final rule which inadvertently led to the omission of the new section from the Code of Federal Regulations.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-05083 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Clarification. 14 CFR Parts 117 and 121 The FAA published a final rule on January 4, 2012, that amends the existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members. Since then, the FAA has received numerous questions about the new flight, duty, and rest rule. This is a response to those questions.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-03559 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical correction. Effective date: The effective date of a final rule correction published in the Federal Register of February 6, 2013 (78 FR 8361), is corrected from January 14, 2014, to January 4, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the effective date of a final rule correction for flightcrew member duty and rest requirements published on February 6, 2013, that required technical corrections in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule. The correct effective date of the rule should read January 4, 2014.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-03178 RIN 2120-AJ33 Docket No. FAA-2011-1136 Notice No. 12-07 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); extension of comment period. The comment period for the NPRM published on November 13, 2012 (77 FR 67584), was scheduled to close on February 11, 2013, and is extended until March 13, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 121 and 135 This action extends the comment period for an NPRM that was published November 13, 2012. In that rulemaking, the FAA proposed to amend the maintenance regulations for domestic, flag, and supplemental operations, and commuter and on-demand operations for aircraft type certificated with a passenger seating configuration of 10 seats or more (excluding any pilot seat). It would require these operators to develop policies, procedures, methods, and instructions for performing contract maintenance that are acceptable to the FAA and to include them in their maintenance manuals. It would also require the operators to provide a list to the FAA of all persons with whom they contract their maintenance. At the behest of several of their FAA-certificated air carrier members, Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association (RACCA) requested that the FAA extend the comment period closing date to allow time to adequately analyze the NPRM and prepare comments.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-02504 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical correction. Effective January 14, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule published on January 4, 2012. In that rule, the FAA amended its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating certain domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. This document corrects several issues requiring a technical correction in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-01695 RIN 2120-AK14 Docket No. FAA-2011-0186 Amendment Nos. 121-362 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. This final rule is effective March 29, 2013. 14 CFR Part 121 This action adds termination criteria and an expiration date to Special Federal Aviation Regulation 111, which temporarily authorizes variances from existing standards related to the provisioning of supplemental oxygen inside lavatories. This action is necessitated by the publication of Airworthiness Directive 2012-11-09, which mandates actions that restore supplemental oxygen to lavatories.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-00608 RIN 2120-AJ17 Docket No. FAA-2012-0929 Notice No. 13-02 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Send comments on or before March 18, 2013. 14 CFR Part 121 The proposed rule would prohibit flightcrew members in operations under part 121 from using a personal wireless communications device or laptop computer for personal use while at their duty station on the flight deck while the aircraft is being operated. This rule, which conforms FAA regulations with recent legislation, is intended to ensure that certain non-essential activities do not contribute to the challenge of task management on the flight deck or a loss of situational awareness due to attention to non-essential tasks.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-30701 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0953 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of availability; Extension of comment period. The comment period for the Notice of availability published on December 7, 2012, was scheduled to close on January 7, 2013, and is extended until January 22, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 This action extends the comment period for a notice of availability that was published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2012. In that document, the FAA announced a proposed policy statement regarding the regulation of some occupational safety and health conditions affecting cabin crewmembers on aircraft by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The comment period is scheduled to close on January 7, 2013. Several airline associations have requested that the FAA extend the comment period for an additional 30 days to allow time for their members to evaluate the impacts and implications of the proposed policy and prepare comments.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-29941 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Availability of Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis. Comments are due February 11, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119 and 121 The FAA is issuing an Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis of its final rule amending its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certain certificate holders and their flightcrew members. That document may be found in the docket listed above. The Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis serves to provide more detail on the potential impacts the final rule would have on cargo-only operations. In addition, the Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis provides expanded discussion of the methodology and information sources used in the original Regulatory Impact Analysis, corrects some reporting of results and minor calculation errors present in that document, and presents sensitivity analysis on key assumptions used in the analysis.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-29631 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0953 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of availability; request for comments. Send comments on or before January 7, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125 and 135 This notice announces the availability of a proposed policy statement regarding the regulation of some occupational safety and health conditions affecting cabin crewmembers on aircraft by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). This policy statement will enhance occupational safety and health in the aircraft cabin by establishing the extent to which OSHA requirements may apply to the working conditions of aircraft cabin crew while they are onboard aircraft in operation.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-29274 RIN 2120-AK11 Docket No. FAA-2012-1059 Notice No. 12-08 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Send comments on or before February 4, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 121, 125, 135 The FAA proposes to amend and harmonize minimum altitudes for use of autopilots for transport category airplanes. The proposed rule would enable the operational use of advanced autopilot and navigation systems by incorporating the capabilities of new and future autopilots, flight guidance systems, and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) guidance systems while protecting the continued use of legacy systems at current autopilot minimum use altitudes. The proposed rule would accomplish this through a performance-based approach, using the certified capabilities of autopilot systems as established by the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) or as approved by the Administrator.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-27433 RIN 2120-AJ33 Docket No. FAA-2011-1136 Notice No. 12-07 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Send comments on or before February 11, 2013. 14 CFR Parts 121 and 135 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to amend the maintenance regulations for domestic, flag, and supplemental operations, and commuter and on-demand operations for aircraft type certificated with a passenger seating configuration of 10 seats or more (excluding any pilot seat). The proposed rules would require these operators to develop policies, procedures, methods, and instructions for performing contract maintenance that are acceptable to the FAA and to include them in their maintenance manuals. The rules would also require the operators to provide a list to the FAA of all persons with whom they contract their maintenance. These changes are needed because contract maintenance has increased to over 70 percent of all air carrier maintenance, and numerous investigations have shown deficiencies in maintenance performed by contract maintenance providers. The proposals would help ensure consistency between contract and in-house air carrier maintenance and enhance the oversight capabilities of both the air carriers and the FAA.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-25412 RIN 2120-AK18 Docket No. FAA-2012-0928 Amdt. No. 121-361 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. Effective October 31, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 This action amends the FAA's rules for permitting limited use of portable oxygen concentrator systems on board aircraft, to allow for the use of additional portable oxygen concentrator (POC) devices on board aircraft, provided certain conditions in the SFAR are met. This action is necessary to allow all POC devices deemed acceptable by the FAA for use in air commerce to be available to the traveling public in need of oxygen therapy. Passengers will be able to carry these devices on board the aircraft and use them with the approval of the aircraft operator.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-22090 RIN 2120-AI05 Docket No. FAA-2006-24281 Amendment Nos. 121-360A, 129-51A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment; correction. This corrective action becomes effective September 7, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 121 and 129 The FAA is correcting a technical amendment published May 24, 2012 to a final rule published November 15, 2010. The final rule required design approval holders of certain existing airplanes and all applicants for type certificates of future transport category airplanes to establish a limit of validity of the engineering data that supports the structural maintenance program (hereinafter referred to as LOV). It also required that operators of any affected airplane incorporate the LOV into the maintenance program for that airplane. The technical amendment to the final rule was issued to correct errors, but within its publication, it contained inadvertent errors due to pagination in two tables. This document corrects the errors in those tables.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-22095 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0429 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of FAA Grant of Exemption No. 10611 The exemption became effective on August 28, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 This document contains a summary of the agency's decision on a petition for exemption. The purpose of the document is to improve the public's awareness and inform affected operators of the FAA's decision.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-21577 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0752 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of policy; request for comments. Written comments must be received on or before October 30, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 The FAA seeks comments on current policy, guidance, and procedures that aircraft operators (ranging from pilots of general aviation aircraft up to and including air carrier certificate holders at the major airlines) use when determining if passenger use of portable electronic devices (PEDs) may be allowed during any phase of flight on their aircraft. Current FAA regulations generally prohibit the use of all PEDs during flight, with the exception of portable voice recorders, hearing aids, heart pacemakers, and electric shavers. These regulations also provide an exception for any other PED that the aircraft operator has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication systems on the aircraft. To better effectuate the safety purposes of these regulations, this notice requests comments about key areas of policy and guidance that are used by aircraft operators when making these determinations. It also requests comments about other technical challenges for addressing the problems associated with determining if and when PEDs can be used. The desired outcome of this solicitation is to have sufficient information to allow operators to better assess whether more widespread use of PEDs during flight is appropriate, while maintaining the highest levels of safety to passengers and aircraft. The Agency stresses that the existing regulations allow the operator to authorize the use of PEDs, and that no specific FAA approval is required. The aircraft operator is responsible for assuring that the interference from PEDs does not pose a flight risk. Once all the comments have been collected, the FAA intends to establish an Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) to review the comments and provide recommendations that might permit the more widespread use of PEDs during flight while maintaining the highest levels of safety for the passengers and aircraft. The FCC will be a key partner in this activity working collaboratively with the FAA, airlines, and the manufacturers to explore broader use of PEDS in flight.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-20464 RIN Docket No. FAA-2011-1082 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed policy; disposition of comments. 14 CFR Parts 91, 97, 121, 125, 129, and 135 On December 15, 2011, the FAA published a Federal Register Notice (76 FR 77939) requesting comments on the FAA's plans for providing PBN services, and particularly the transition from the current Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Ranges (VOR) and other legacy navigation aids (NAVAIDS) to Area Navigation (RNAV)-based airspace and procedures. This action responds to the public comments the FAA received.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-16342 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0670 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Proposed interpretation; correction. 14 CFR Part 121 On June 1, 2012 at 77 FR 32441, the FAA published a proposed legal interpretation in which the agency considered clarifying prior legal interpretations regarding pilot in command discretion under 14 CFR 121.547(a)(3) and (a)(4). The agency inadvertently assigned an incorrect docket number to the proposed legal interpretation. This document corrects the docket number. Any comments submitted to docket number FAA-2011-0045 regarding the proposed legal interpretation published at 77 FR 32441 will be moved to the correct docket, FAA-2012-0670.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-14280 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0486 Amdt. No. 121-359 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective June 12, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 The “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012,” enacted on February 14, 2012, in Section 305 of the Act, removed the line check performance evaluation requirements for pilots over 60 years of age that applied to air carriers engaged in part 121 operations. This technical amendment conforms to the FAA's regulations as a result of the Act.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-13290 RIN Docket No. FAA-2011-0045 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Proposed interpretation. Comments must be received on or before July 31, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 The FAA is considering clarifying prior legal interpretations regarding pilot in command discretion under 14 CFR 121.547(a)(3) and (a)(4).
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-12658 RIN 2120-AI05 Docket No. FAA-2006-24281 Amendment Nos. 26-6, 121-360, 129-51 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective May 24, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 26, 121, and 129 The FAA is correcting a final rule published on November 15, 2010. That rule required design approval holders of certain existing airplanes and all applicants for type certificates of future transport category airplanes to establish a limit of validity of the engineering data that supports the structural maintenance program (hereinafter referred to as LOV). It also required that operators of any affected airplane incorporate the LOV into the maintenance program for that airplane. This document corrects errors in codified text of that document.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-12383 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0374 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of public meeting. The public meetings will be held on June 26, 27, and 28, 2012, from 8:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Note that the meetings may be adjourned early if scheduled speakers complete their presentations early. The deadline to submit a request to make an oral statement is June 18, 2012. The written comment period will close on June 18, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 91, 119, 120, 121, 135, and 136 The FAA is announcing public meetings to gather additional technical input on the subject of exemptions relating to the LHFE. Input gathered will aid in developing future FAA guidance for evaluating LHFE petitions for exemption. Prior to the public meetings, the FAA is seeking public comment on the guidance.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-11592 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1A, 119-16A, 121-357A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; correction. The effective date for the rule published January 4, 2012, at 77 FR 330, is corrected to January 4, 2014. The corrections in this document are effective January 4, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 The FAA is correcting the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule published on January 4, 2012. In that rule, the FAA amended its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating certain domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. This document corrects the effective date and several errors in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-7739 RIN Docket No. FAA-2012-0358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of procedures for submitting clarifying questions. You must submit your clarifying questions in writing using the procedures outlined below by June 4, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 117 and 121 The FAA published a final rule on January 4, 2012 that amends the existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members. Since then, the FAA has received questions from stakeholders concerning the provisions of the final rule. In response to these questions, the FAA is issuing this document, which announces the procedures for submitting clarifying questions to the final rule.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-4627 RIN 2120-AJ67 Docket No. FAA-2010-0100 Notice No. 12-01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Send your comments on or before April 30, 2012. 14 CFR Parts 61, 121, 135, 141, and 142 This action would create new certification requirements for pilots in air carrier operations. The proposal would require a second in command (first officer) in part 121 operations to hold an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate and a type rating for the aircraft to be flown. The FAA proposes to allow pilots with an aviation degree or military pilot experience to obtain an ATP certificate with restricted privileges with fewer than 1,500 hours total time as a pilot. The proposal also would require at least 1,000 flight hours in air carrier operations in order to serve as a pilot in command in part 121 air carrier operations. Finally, the FAA is proposing to modify an ATP certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating or type rating to require 50 hours of multiengine flight experience and completion of a new FAA-approved ATP Certification Training Program for a Multiengine Class Rating or Type Rating that would include academic training and training in a flight simulation training device. These proposed requirements would ensure that pilots have proper qualifications and experience in difficult operational conditions and in a multicrew environment prior to serving as pilot flightcrew members in air carrier operations.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-4571 RIN 2120-AJ92 Docket No. FAA-2011-0186 Amdt. Nos. 21-94, 25-133, 121-354, 129-50 SFAR 111 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Interim final rule; disposition of comments. 14 CFR Parts 21, 25, 121, and 129 On March 8, 2011, the FAA published an interim final rule, request for comments (Amendment Nos. 21-94, 25-133, 121-354, 129-50; SFAR 111) on security considerations for lavatory oxygen systems (77 FR 12550). The interim final rule addresses a security vulnerability and is needed so the affected airplanes can continue operating until the non-compliance to airworthiness standards and operating rules is resolved. We sought public comment on the interim final rule even though it became effective upon publication. This action responds to the public comments the FAA received.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-1830 RIN Docket No. FAA-2011-1343 Amdt. No. 121-358 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. Effective January 27, 2012. 14 CFR Part 121 The FAA is amending regulations relating to operating rules for FAA approved portable oxygen concentrators (POC) onboard aircraft. This document updates the names of two manufacturers of approved POCs listed in the Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR).
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2011-33078 RIN 2120-AJ58 Docket No. FAA-2009-1093 Amdt. Nos. 117-1, 119-16, 121-357 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule. Effective January 14, 2014. 14 CFR Parts 117, 119, and 121 This rule amends the FAA's existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating under the domestic, flag, and supplemental operations rules. The rule recognizes the universality of factors that lead to fatigue in most individuals and regulates these factors to ensure that flightcrew members in passenger operations do not accumulate dangerous amounts of fatigue. Fatigue threatens aviation safety because it increases the risk of pilot error that could lead to an accident. This risk is heightened in passenger operations because of the additional number of potentially impacted individuals. The new requirements eliminate the current distinctions between domestic, flag and supplemental passenger operations. The rule provides different requirements based on the time of day, whether an individual is acclimated to a new time zone, and the likelihood of being able to sleep under different circumstances.