Link to an amendment published at 76 FR 75756, December 2, 2011.
It must be shown by the methods of paragraph (b) and either paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, that the airplane is free from flutter, control reversal, and divergence for any condition of operation within the limit V-n envelope and at all speeds up to the speed specified for the selected method. In addition—
Adequate tolerances must be established for quantities which affect flutter, including speed, damping, mass balance, and control system stiffness; and
The natural frequencies of main structural components must be determined by vibration tests or other approved methods.
Flight flutter tests must be made to show that the airplane is free from flutter, control reversal and divergence and to show that—
Proper and adequate attempts to induce flutter have been made within the speed range up to VD ;
The vibratory response of the structure during the test indicates freedom from flutter;
A proper margin of damping exists at VD; and
There is no large and rapid reduction in damping as VD is approached.
Any rational analysis used to predict freedom from flutter, control reversal and divergence must cover all speeds up to 1.2 VD.
Compliance with the rigidity and mass balance criteria (pages 4-12), in Airframe and Equipment Engineering Report No. 45 (as corrected) “Simplified Flutter Prevention Criteria” (published by the Federal Aviation Administration) may be accomplished to show that the airplane is free from flutter, control reversal, or divergence if—
VD /MD for the airplane is less than 260 knots (EAS) and less than Mach 0.5,
The wing and aileron flutter prevention criteria, as represented by the wing torsional stiffness and aileron balance criteria, are limited in use to airplanes without large mass concentrations (such as engines, floats, or fuel tanks in outer wing panels) along the wing span, and
Does not have a T-tail or other unconventional tail configurations;
Does not have unusual mass distributions or other unconventional design features that affect the applicability of the criteria, and
Has fixed-fin and fixed-stabilizer surfaces.
For turbopropeller-powered airplanes, the dynamic evaluation must include—
Whirl mode degree of freedom which takes into account the stability of the plane of rotation of the propeller and significant elastic, inertial, and aerodynamic forces, and
Propeller, engine, engine mount, and airplane structure stiffness and damping variations appropriate to the particular configuration.
Freedom from flutter, control reversal, and divergence up to VD /MD must be shown as follows:
For airplanes that meet the criteria of paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section, after the failure, malfunction, or disconnection of any single element in any tab control system.
For airplanes other than those described in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, after the failure, malfunction, or disconnection of any single element in the primary flight control system, any tab control system, or any flutter damper.
For airplanes showing compliance with the fail-safe criteria of §§ 23.571 and 23.572, the airplane must be shown by analysis to be free from flutter up to VD /MD after fatigue failure, or obvious partial failure, of a principal structural element.
For airplanes showing compliance with the damage tolerance criteria of § 23.573, the airplane must be shown by analysis to be free from flutter up to VD /MD with the extent of damage for which residual strength is demonstrated.
For modifications to the type design that could affect the flutter characteristics, compliance with paragraph (a) of this section must be shown, except that analysis based on previously approved data may be used alone to show freedom from flutter, control reversal and divergence, for all speeds up to the speed specified for the selected method.
[Amdt. 23-23, 43 FR 50592, Oct. 30, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 23-31, 49 FR 46867, Nov. 28, 1984; Amdt. 23-45, 58 FR 42164, Aug. 6, 1993; 58 FR 51970, Oct. 5, 1993; Amdt. 23-48, 61 FR 5148, Feb. 9, 1996]
Effective Date Note:
By Amdt. 23-62, 76 FR 75756, Dec. 2, 2011, § 23.629 was amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(4), and (c), effective Jan. 31, 2012. For the convenience of the user, the revised text is set forth as follows:
Proper and adequate attempts to induce flutter have been made within the speed range up to VD /MD, or VDF /MDF for jets;
A proper margin of damping exists at VD /MD, or VDF /MDF for jets; and
As VD /MD (or VDF /MDF for jets) is approached, there is no large or rapid reduction in damping.
Any rational analysis used to predict freedom from flutter, control reversal and divergence must cover all speeds up to 1.2 VD /1.2 MD, limited to Mach 1.0 for subsonic airplanes.