5 CFR 213 - EXCEPTED SERVICE
- SUBPART A — General Provisions (§§ 213.101 - 213.104)
- SUBPART B — [Reserved]
- SUBPART C — Excepted Schedules (§§ 213.3101 - 213.3302)
Title 5 published on 2012-01-01
The following are only the Rules published in the Federal Register after the published date of Title 5.
For a complete list of all Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices view the Rulemaking tab.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
§ 2103 - The excepted service
§ 3161 - Employment and compensation of employees
§ 3301 - Civil service; generally
§ 3302 - Competitive service; rules
§ 3307 - Competitive service; maximum-age entrance requirements; exceptions
§ 3391 - Definitions
§ 3392 - General appointment provisions
§ 3393a - Repealed.
§ 3393 - Career appointments
§ 3394 - Noncareer and limited appointments
§ 3395 - Reassignment and transfer within the Senior Executive Service
§ 3396 - Development for and within the Senior Executive Service
§ 8337 - Disability retirement
§ 8456 - Military reserve technicians
§ 4301 - Purposes; sense of Congress
§ 4302 - Relation to other law and plans or agreements
§ 4303 - Definitions
§ 4304 - Character of service
112 Stat. 3182-83
Executive Order ... 10577
Executive Order ... 13162
Executive Order ... 13318
Title 5 published on 2012-01-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 5 CFR 213 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-11068 RIN 3206-AM34 OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Final rule. This final rule is effective July 10, 2012. Agencies, however, shall have a 6-month transition period following the effective date of the final rule to convert to the Internship Program any students serving under appointments made pursuant to the Student Educational Employment Program and to transition to the new Presidential Management Fellows Program any Fellows currently serving under appointments made pursuant to the existing Presidential Management Fellows Program. In addition, during the transition period, agencies are permitted to make appointments under the Internship and Presidential Management Fellows Programs even if they have not entered into a final Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with OPM, as required by 5 CFR 362.104. This transition period does not apply to the Recent Graduates Program, and appointments under the Recent Graduate Program may not be made until an MOU is in place. 5 CFR Parts 213, 302, 315, 330, 334, 362, 531, 536, 537, 550, 575, and 890 The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing final regulations implementing the Pathways Programs established by E.O. 13562, signed December 27, 2010. As directed by the President, the Pathways Programs provide clear paths to Federal internships and potential careers in Government for students and recent graduates. The Pathways Programs consist of the Internship Program, the Recent Graduates Program and the Presidential Management Fellows Program. Positions in the Pathways Programs are excepted from the competitive service. Participants in these Programs are appointed under the newly created Schedule D of the excepted service.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-2660 RIN 3206-AM07 OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Proposed rule. We will consider comments received on or before April 9, 2012. 5 CFR Part 213 The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing to amend its regulations pertaining to the appointment of persons with disabilities. The proposed changes eliminate the requirement that an applicant supply a certification of job readiness and provide clarification on appointments under this authority. In addition, OPM is cognizant of a change in terminology as evinced, for example in “Rosa's Law,” which Congress enacted in October of 2010. Although Rosa's Law is not applicable here, it has prompted us to reconsider our own use of terminology, and we propose to substitute the phrase “intellectual disability” for the phrase “mental retardation” throughout this Part, without any change in the intended coverage.