50 CFR Part 20 - MIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING
- SUBPART A — Introduction (§§ 20.1 - 20.2)
- SUBPART B — Definitions (§§ 20.11 - 20.11)
- SUBPART C — Taking (§§ 20.20 - 20.26)
- SUBPART D — Possession (§§ 20.31 - 20.40)
- SUBPART E — Transportation Within the United States (§§ 20.41 - 20.44)
- SUBPART F — Exportation (§§ 20.51 - 20.53)
- SUBPART G — Importations (§§ 20.61 - 20.66)
- SUBPART H — Federal, State, and Foreign Law (§§ 20.71 - 20.73)
- SUBPART I — Migratory Bird Preservation Facilities (§§ 20.81 - 20.83)
- SUBPART J — Feathers or Skins (§§ 20.91 - 20.92)
- SUBPART K — Annual Seasons, Limits, and Shooting Hours Schedules (§§ 20.100 - 20.110)
- SUBPART L — Administrative and Miscellaneous Provisions (§§ 20.131 - 20.134)
- SUBPART M — [Reserved]
- SUBPART N — Special Procedures for Issuance of Annual Hunting Regulations (§§ 20.151 - 20.155)
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
no entries appear in the Federal Register after this date.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 50 CFR 20 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-08212 RIN 1018-AY87 FF09M21200-134-FXMB1231099BPP0 Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2013-0057 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed rule; availability of supplemental information. You must submit comments on the proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2013-14 duck hunting seasons on or before June 22, 2013. Following subsequent Federal Register notices, you will be given an opportunity to submit comments for proposed early-season frameworks by July 27, 2013, and for proposed late-season frameworks and subsistence migratory bird seasons in Alaska by August 31, 2013. Tribes must submit proposals and related comments on or before June 1, 2013. Proposals from the Co-management Council for the 2015 spring and summer migratory bird subsistence harvest season must be submitted to the Flyway Councils and the Service on or before June 15, 2013. 50 CFR Part 20 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter the Service or we) proposes to establish annual hunting regulations for certain migratory game birds for the 2013-14 hunting season. We annually prescribe outside limits (frameworks) within which States may select hunting seasons. This proposed rule provides the regulatory schedule, describes the proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2013-14 duck hunting seasons, requests proposals from Indian tribes that wish to establish special migratory game bird hunting regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands, and requests proposals for the 2015 spring and summer migratory bird subsistence season in Alaska. Migratory game bird hunting seasons provide opportunities for recreation and sustenance; aid Federal, State, and tribal governments in the management of migratory game birds; and permit harvests at levels compatible with migratory game bird population status and habitat conditions.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-04906 RIN 1018-AY59 FF09M21200-134-FXMB1231099BPP0 Docket No. FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed rule. Electronic comments on this proposal via http://www.regulations.gov must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 3, 2013. Comments submitted by mail must be postmarked no later than June 3, 2013. Comments on the information collection requirements are due no later than April 3, 2013. 50 CFR Part 20 We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to revise our regulations regarding the approval of nontoxic shot types to make the regulations easier to understand. The language governing determination of Expected Environmental Concentrations (EECs) in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is altered to make clear the shot size and number of shot to be used in calculating the EECs. We propose to specify the pH levels to be used in calculating the EEC in water. We also propose to move the requirement for in vitro testing to Tier 1, which will allow us to better assess applications and minimize the need for Tier 2 applications. We propose to add language for withdrawal of alloys that have been demonstrated to have detrimental environmental or biological effects, or for which no suitable field-testing device is available. We expect these changes to reduce the time required for nontoxic shot approvals. Finally, we propose to charge fees to cover our costs in evaluating these applications.