50 CFR 20, Subpart B - Definitions
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
no entries appear in the Federal Register after this date.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
113 Stat. 1491
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 50 CFR 20 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-04906 RIN 1018-AY59 FF09M21200-134-FXMB1231099BPP0 Docket No. FWS-R9-MB-2011-0077 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed rule. Electronic comments on this proposal via http://www.regulations.gov must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 3, 2013. Comments submitted by mail must be postmarked no later than June 3, 2013. Comments on the information collection requirements are due no later than April 3, 2013. 50 CFR Part 20 We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to revise our regulations regarding the approval of nontoxic shot types to make the regulations easier to understand. The language governing determination of Expected Environmental Concentrations (EECs) in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is altered to make clear the shot size and number of shot to be used in calculating the EECs. We propose to specify the pH levels to be used in calculating the EEC in water. We also propose to move the requirement for in vitro testing to Tier 1, which will allow us to better assess applications and minimize the need for Tier 2 applications. We propose to add language for withdrawal of alloys that have been demonstrated to have detrimental environmental or biological effects, or for which no suitable field-testing device is available. We expect these changes to reduce the time required for nontoxic shot approvals. Finally, we propose to charge fees to cover our costs in evaluating these applications.