50 CFR 21, Subpart D - Control of Depredating and Otherwise Injurious Birds
- § 21.41 — Depredation permits.
- § 21.42 — Authority to issue depredating orders to permit the killing of migratory game birds.
- § 21.43 — Depredation order for blackbirds, cowbirds, grackles, crows, and magpies.
- § 21.44 — Depredation order for designated species of depredating birds in California.
- § 21.45 — Depredation order for depredating purple gallinules in Louisiana.
- § 21.46 — Depredation order for depredating scrub jays and Steller's jays in Washington and Oregon.
- § 21.47 — Depredation order for double-crested cormorants at aquaculture facilities.
- § 21.48 — Depredation order for double-crested cormorants to protect public resources.
- § 21.49 — Control order for resident Canada geese at airports and military airfields.
- § 21.50 — Depredation order for resident Canada geese nests and eggs.
- § 21.51 — Depredation order for resident Canada geese at agricultural facilities.
- § 21.52 — Public health control order for resident Canada geese.
- § 21.53 — Control order for purple swamphens.
- § 21.54 — Control order for muscovy ducks in the United States.
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
The following are only the Rules published in the Federal Register after the published date of Title 50.
For a complete list of all Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices view the Rulemaking tab.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
§ 703 - Taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds unlawful
§ 703 note - Taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds unlawful
§ 712 - Treaty and convention implementing regulations; seasonal taking of migratory birds for essential needs of indigenous Alaskans to preserve and maintain stocks of the birds; protection and conservation of the birds
Title 50 published on 2012-10-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 50 CFR 21 after this date.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-11255 RIN 1018-AY65 FF09M21200-234-FXMB1232099BPP0 Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2012-0037 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed rule. Electronic comments on this proposal via http://www.regulations.gov must be submitted by 11.59 p.m. Eastern time on August 12, 2013. Comments submitted by mail must be postmarked no later than August 12, 2013. 50 CFR Part 21 We propose to revise the regulations that allow control of depredating birds in some counties in California. We propose to specify the counties in which this order is effective, to better identify which species may be taken under the order, to add a requirement that landowners attempt nonlethal control, to add a requirement for use of nontoxic ammunition, and to revise the reporting required. These changes would update and clarify the current regulations and enhance our ability to carry out our responsibility to conserve migratory birds.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2013-11254 RIN 1018-AY60 FF09M21200-234-FXMB1232099BPP0 Docket No. FWS-R9-MB-2012-0027 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed rule. Electronic comments on this proposal via http://www.regulations.gov must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on August 12, 2013. Comments submitted by mail must be postmarked no later than August 12, 2013. Comments on the information collection requirements are due no later than June 12, 2013. 50 CFR Part 21 We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose changes to the regulations governing control of depredating blackbirds, cowbirds, grackles, crows and magpies. The yellow-billed magpie ( Pica nuttalli ) is endemic to California and has suffered substantial population declines. It is a species of conservation concern. We propose to remove the species from the depredation order. After this change, a depredation permit would be necessary to control the species. We also propose to narrow the application of the regulation from protection of any wildlife to protection of threatened or endangered species only. We propose to add conditions for live trapping, which are not currently included in the regulation. Finally, we propose to refine the reporting requirement to gather data more useful in assessing actions under the order.
GPO FDSys XML | Text type regulations.gov FR Doc. 2012-26941 RIN 1018-AZ16 91200-1231-9BPP FWS-HQ-MB-2012-0084 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Fish and Wildlife Service Final rule. This rule is effective January 1, 2013. 50 CFR Part 21 The States of Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and North Dakota have requested that we delegate permitting for falconry to the State, as provided under our regulations. We have reviewed regulations and supporting materials provided by these States, and have concluded that their regulations comply with the Federal regulations. We change the falconry regulations accordingly.