skip navigation

Illinois Legal Ethics

1.11   Rule 1.11 Successive Government and Private Employment

1.11:100   Comparative Analysis of Illinois Rule

¥ Primary Illinois References: IL Rule 1.11
¥ Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.11, Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary:

1.11:101      Model Rule Comparison

The IRPC Rule is similar to MR 1.11, slightly modified with respect to the language on knowledge by others in the lawyer's firm, and omitting a provision with respect to law clerks which was felt to be superfluous by the Illinois drafters in light of Rule 1.12.

Note that Illinois, in IRPC 1.10, has defined "screening"; the ABA text, in MR 1.11, simply uses the word without definition. The phrase "appropriate government agency" is question-begging.

Although little of IRPC 1.11 has any parallel in the Illinois Code, RulesÊ8-101 and 9-101 thereof touched on the same issues.

1.11:102      Model Code Comparison

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:110      Federal Conflict of Interest Statutes and Regulations

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:120      Illinois Conflict of Interest Statutes and Regulations

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:130      Definition of "Matter"

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:200   Representation of Another Client by Former Government Lawyer

¥ Primary Illinois References: IL Rule 1.11
¥ Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.11(a), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91:4001, ALI-LGL ¤ 214, Wolfram ¤ 8.10

It is not uncommon for a government lawyer to jump the fence to the private sector. When that happens, conflicts can arise where the lawyer, or her law firm, represents a client whose interests are adverse to those of the lawyer's former client, the People. See People v. Lawson, 644 N.E.2d 1172 (Dec.Ê1, 1994) (surveying the law in this area). In People v. Lawson, a former assistant State's Attorney who participated in the early portion of the prosecution of a first-degree murder case (e.g., by appearing at the defendant's arraignment) moved to the public defender's office, where he was disqualified from representing the defendant in the same case, although there was no showing by the defendant of an actual or potentially adverse effect on his defense. However, this per se rule of disqualification will not be applied to disqualify a fence-jumping attorney in a criminal matter where the attorney did not personally serve in the same criminal proceeding as both the prosecutor and then as the court-appointed defense counsel. See People v. Lawson, 644 N.E.2d at 1185-86; see also People v. Newberry, 302 N.E.2d 34 (1973) (no material adversity where appointed defense counsel had previously served as head of the criminal division of the State's Attorney's office at time client was indicted). The attorney's new firm will not be disqualified so long as the firm effectively timely screens the attorney from the matter. See People v. Lawson, 644 N.E.2d at 1186 (citing cases which discuss screening procedures).

1.11:210      No Imputation to Firm if Former Government Lawyer Is Screened

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:300   Use of Confidential Government Information

¥ Primary Illinois References: IL Rule 1.11
¥ Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.11(b), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91:4001, ALI-LGL ¤ 214, Wolfram ¤ 8.10

1.11:310      Definition of "Confidential Government Information"

[The discussion of this topic has not yet been written.]

1.11:400   Government Lawyer Participation in Matters Related to Prior Representation

¥ Primary Illinois References: IL Rule 1.11
¥ Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.11(c), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ , ALI-LGL ¤ 213, 214, Wolfram ¤ 8.9.4

1.11:500   Government Lawyer Negotiating for Private Employment

¥ Primary Illinois References: IL Rule 1.11
¥ Background References: ABA Model Rule 1.11(c)(2), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91:4001, ALI-LGL ¤¤ 156, 214, Wolfram ¤ 9.10