Louisiana Legal Ethics
1.3:100 Comparative Analysis of Louisiana Rule
¥ Primary Louisiana References:
LA Rule 1.3
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary:
1.3:101 Model Rule Comparison
The text of LRPC 1.3 is identical to that in its counterpart, MR 1.3.
1.3:102 Model Code Comparison
Unlike the Louisiana Rules and the Model Rules, there is no general rule of diligence in the Model Code. Instead, the Model Code uses a series of more specific Disciplinary Rules and Ethical Considerations to accomplish what is set forth in LRPC 1.3. DR 6-101(A)(3) imposes a negative duty on lawyers, preventing them from Òneglecting mattersÓ entrusted to them. EC 6-4 urges lawyers who accept employment beyond their competence to diligently undertake the work and study necessary to become qualified in the matter. EC 2-31 suggests that lawyers who undertake representation complete the work involved, including representation on appeal, if necessary. DR 7-101(A) forbids a lawyer from intentionally failing to execute the lawful objectives of his client, failing to carry out his employment contracts with clients and from prejudicing or damaging his client during the course of representation. EC 7-38 also requires a lawyer to be ÒpunctualÓ in fulfilling his professional commitments. LRPC 1.3 has the same effect as these Disciplinary Rules and Ethical Considerations by succinctly and affirmatively requiring that a lawyer act with Òreasonable diligence and promptness.Ó
1.3:200 Diligence and "Zeal"
¥ Primary Louisiana References:
LA Rule 1.3
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 31:401, ALI-LGL ¤ 28, Wolfram
¤ 10.3
This section has not yet been completed.
1.3:300 Promptness
¥ Primary Louisiana References:
LA Rule 1.3
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.3, Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 31:401, ALI-LGL ¤ 28, Wolfram
¤ 10.3
This section has not yet been completed.
 |
 |
 |