1.12 Rule 1.12 Former Judge or Arbitrator
¥ Primary Maryland References:
MD Rule 1.12
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12, Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary:
There are no substantive differences between Maryland Rule 1.12 and MR 1.12. The comment; MR 1.12, cmt. sections accompanying each Rule are identical.
Paragraph (a) is substantially similar to DR 9-101(A), which provides that "a lawyer shall not accept employment in a matter upon the merits of which he has acted in a judicial capacity." Paragraph (a) differs, however, in that it is broader in scope and states more specifically the persons to whom it applies. There is no counterpart in the Model Code to paragraphs (b), (c), or (d).
With regard to arbitrators, EC 5-20 states that "a lawyer [who] has undertaken to act as an impartial arbitrator or mediator . . . should not thereafter represent in the dispute any of the parties involved." DR 9-101(A) does not provide a waiver of the disqualification applied to former judges by consent of the parties. However, DR 5-105(C) is similar in effect and could be construed to permit waiver.
¥ Primary Maryland References:
MD Rule 1.12(a)
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(a), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91.4501
This section has not yet been completed.
¥ Primary Maryland References:
MD Rule 1.12(b)
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(b), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91:4001, ALI-LGL ¤ 206, Wolfram
¤ 8.10
This section has not yet been completed.
¥ Primary Maryland References:
MD Rule 1.12(c)
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(c), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 91:4501, ALI-LGL ¤¤ 203, 204,
Wolfram ¤ 7.6.4
This section has not yet been completed.
¥ Primary Maryland References:
MD Rule 1.12(d)
¥ Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(d), Other Jurisdictions
¥ Commentary: ABA/BNA ¤ 51:1501
This section has not yet been completed.