1.12 Rule 1.12 Former Judge or Arbitrator
Primary OR References: DR
5-109(A)
Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12, Other Jurisdictions
Commentary:
OR Commentary: EOL §
14
DR 5-109(A) is substantively similar to MR 1.12(a), except that the latter is broader in scope and states more specifically the persons to whom it applies. The DRs do not have counterparts to MR 1.12(b) through (d).
DR 5-109(A) is similar to MC DR 9-101(A).
Primary OR References: DR
5-109(A)
Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(a), Other
Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 91.4501
OR Commentary:
DR 5-109(A) provides that a lawyer shall not represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, or law clerk to such a person, unless all parties to the proceeding consent after full disclosure. Such disclosure must be made to, and consent must be obtained from, all parties to the proceeding.
As with the standard articulated in DR 5-109(B) for former government employees, a judges personal and substantial participation is comparable to that which would constitute a former-client matter-specific conflict, as those terms are used in DR 5-105(C)(1). A judge or clerk must have been personally involved [in a matter] to an important, material degree, as opposed to the signing of a routine order or the mere reviewing of the status of the case, in order to be disqualified from subsequent representation. OSB Legal Ethics Op No 1991-120 (quoting ABA Formal Ethics Op 342 (1975)).
Primary OR References:
Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(b), Other
Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 91:4001, ALI-LGL § 125, Wolfram
§ 8.10
OR Commentary:
Like the ABA Model Code, the DRs do not include a counterpart to MR 1.12(b).
Primary OR References:
Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(c), Other
Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 91:4501, ALI-LGL §§ 123, 124,
Wolfram § 7.6.4
OR Commentary:
Like the ABA Model Code, the DRs do not include a counterpart to MR 1.12(c). Nevertheless, OSB Legal Ethics Op No 1991-120 provides that if a former judge is unable to obtain consent from all parties after full disclosure, the firm to which that former judge belongs may still represent its client, provided the former judge is screened pursuant to DR 5-105(I).
Primary OR References:
Background References: ABA
Model Rule 1.12(d), Other
Jurisdictions
Commentary: ABA/BNA § 51:1501
OR Commentary:
Like the ABA Model Code, the DRs do not include a counterpart to MR 1.12(d).