EVELYN ARES, &C., APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF
NEW YORK AND THE NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY,
RESPONDENTS.
80 N.Y.2d 959, 605 N.E.2d 361, 590 N.Y.S.2d 874
(1992).
October 29, 1992
1 No. 186
Decided
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
Cheryl Eisberg Moin, for Appellant.
Benjamin A. Fleischner, for Respondents.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division erred in concluding that Labor Law § 241 (6) applies only to work in connection with the construction or demolition of buildings and not to the highway construction project involved here (see, Mosher v State of New York, ___ NY2d ___ [decided today]). Nevertheless, the claimant's cause of action under that section was properly dismissed. The record supports the Court of Claims' conclusion that claimant failed to establish that a violation of a safety regulation promulgated pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) was the proximate cause of the accident.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge
Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock and Bellacosa
concur. Judge Smith took no part.