Cantor Fitzgerald Incorporated,
Appellant,
v.
Cantor Fitzgerald Securities,
et al.,
Respondents.
2000 NY Int. 133
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff Cantor Fitzgerald, Inc. (CFI), was the
successor lessee of a 1978 lease with defendant Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey for office space at One World Trade
Center, New York City. Port Authority retained a total of
$177,000 as a security deposit for the premises. On September
25, 1992, pursuant to an assignment of assets agreement ("Asset
Agreement"), CFI transferred and assigned to defendant Cantor
In 1997, CFI assigned the lease to CFS. A dispute arose as to who owned the underlying security deposit related to the lease. CFLP maintains that the security deposit was transferred as part of the general assignment of assets. CFI argues that since the lease was expressly exempt from the 1992 assignment of assets, the security deposit was also excluded. CFI moved, and CFLP cross-moved, for summary judgment. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to CFLP and the Appellate Division affirmed. On this appeal both sides argue that they are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
The various agreements between the parties do not
specifically mention the disposition of the security deposit, and
the intent of the parties concerning that asset cannot be gleaned
unambiguously from those instruments alone. Nevertheless, a
review of the record reflects that CFS carried the security
deposit as an asset of the business during the period that the
companies were under the common control of their founder. Thus,
we conclude that the intent of these parties in entering the
Asset Agreement was for CFI to retain its rights and privileges