Search

Search results

1. Coyle v. Smith

   221 U.S. 559 Coyle v. Smith (No. 941) Argued: April 15, 16, 1911 Decided: May 29, 1911 113 ...

2. Coyle v. Smith

   221 U.S. 559 Coyle v. Smith (No. 941) Argued: April 15, 16, 1911 Decided: May 29, 1911 113 ...

3. PUERTO RICO v. SANCHEZ VALLE

   capabilities of the first 13. See Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, 566 (1911) (noting that the very meaning of ... counterparts both brought to the Union and chose to maintain. See Coyle, 221 U. S., at 573 (“[W]hen a new State ... v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 515, 559–561 (1832); Talton v. Mayes, 163 U. S. 376, 384 (1896); Michigan v. Bay ...

4. Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Authority

   v. Oklahoma, 221 U.S. 559 (1911). We note and accept Justice Frankfurter's observation in New ... constitutional structure might impose on federal action affecting the States under the Commerce Clause. See Coyle ...

5. FRANCHISE TAX BD. OF CAL. v. HYATT

   States. In light of the “constitutional equality” among the States, Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, 580 ... similar to that of Nevada, should it wish to do so. See Coyle v. Smith, 221 U. S. 559, 567 (1911) (The ...

6. Baker v. Carr

   Yet the right to decide is placed there, and not in the courts. [p221] So, too, as relates to the ...

7. Baker v. Carr

   Yet the right to decide is placed there, and not in the courts. [p221] So, too, as relates to the ...

8. Baker v. Carr

   Yet the right to decide is placed there, and not in the courts. [p221] So, too, as relates to the ...

9. Baker v. Carr

   Yet the right to decide is placed there, and not in the courts. [p221] So, too, as relates to the ...

10. Baker v. Carr

    Yet the right to decide is placed there, and not in the courts. [p221] So, too, as relates to the ...

Pages