Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74-6257) Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976___ ... under the law of Georgia violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I The petitioner, Troy Gregg ...

  2. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74-6257) Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976___ ... under the law of Georgia violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I The petitioner, Troy Gregg ...

  3. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74-6257) Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976___ ... under the law of Georgia violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I The petitioner, Troy Gregg ...

  4. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74-6257) Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976___ ... under the law of Georgia violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I The petitioner, Troy Gregg ...

  5. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 Gregg v. Georgia (No. 74-6257) Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976___ ... under the law of Georgia violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. I The petitioner, Troy Gregg ...

  6. McCleskey v. Kemp

    recognized meaning under the Eighth Amendment. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 206, 207. Pp. 306-308. (b) ... criminal laws against murder. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 226 (1976) (WHITE, J., concurring). ... concerning the infliction of a challenged sanction," Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. at 173. In assessing ...

  7. McCleskey v. Kemp

    recognized meaning under the Eighth Amendment. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 206, 207. Pp. 306-308. (b) ... criminal laws against murder. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 226 (1976) (WHITE, J., concurring). ... concerning the infliction of a challenged sanction," Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. at 173. In assessing ...

  8. Pulley v. Harris

    proportionality review by an appellate court in every capital case. The outcome in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 ... all cases a disproportionate penalty in this sense. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 187 (1976) ... decisions in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976); Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976); Jurek v. ...

  9. Pulley v. Harris

    proportionality review by an appellate court in every capital case. The outcome in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 ... all cases a disproportionate penalty in this sense. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 187 (1976) ... decisions in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976); Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976); Jurek v. ...

  10. Coker v. Georgia

    accordance with the procedures dealt with at length in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), where this ... in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976); Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976); Jurek v. Texas, ... the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227 (1976) (dissenting opinion), ...

Pages