1. Home › Search › Site › 501 AND 957 AND Harmelin › supct_node

Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
501 and 957 and harmed

Search results

  1. MILLER v. ALABAMA

    first contend that Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, forecloses a holding that mandatory ... (along with Justice Thomas) first claim that Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957 (1991), precludes our ... life-without-parole sentences for juveniles violate the Eighth Amendment. Harmelin declined to extend the ...

  2. LOCKYER v. ANDRADE

    analysis questionable in light of Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957. It then compared the facts in ... instructive in applying Harmelin; and found that the California Court of Appeal’s disregard for Solem ... law. Andrade claims that Rummel, Solem, and Harmelin clearly establish a principle that his sentence is ...

  3. JONES v. MISSISSIPPI

    501 U. S. 957, 996–1009 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). ... disproportionality regarding Jones’s sentence. See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 23; Harmelin v. Michigan, ...

  4. Docket no. 17-1091

    punishment “cost a State money.” Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, 979, n. 9 (1991) (opinion of Scalia, ... and ancient Practice” and violated the prohibition on “excessive Fines.” Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 ... U. S. 957, 971 (1991); Trial of Oates, 10 State Trials 1080, 1325 (K. B. 1685). The House of Commons ...

  5. CAMPBELL v. OHIO

    permitted by law.” Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, 1001 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and ...

  6. BAZE v. REES

    Syllabus BAZE v. REES (No. 07-5439) 217 S.W. 3d 207, affirmed. ...

  7. BAZE v. REES

    Syllabus BAZE v. REES (No. 07-5439) 217 S.W. 3d 207, affirmed. ...

  8. EWING v. CALIFORNIA

    Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, 996 –997 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and ... principle. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, 967 –985 (1991) (opinion of Scalia, J.). Because ... Harmelin, 501 U. S., at 998 (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). Our traditional ...

  9. GLOSSIP v. GROSS

    Syllabus GLOSSIP v. GROSS () 776 F. 3d 721, affirmed. ...

  10. GLOSSIP v. GROSS

    Syllabus GLOSSIP v. GROSS () 776 F. 3d 721, affirmed. ...

Pages