Skip to main content
search

liibulletin: The LII Supreme Court Bulletin

You can: subscribe, donate, or become a corporate sponsor.

contents and context

The liibulletin is a Cornell Law School electronic journal. Its editorial board comprises second- and third-year law students, who are responsible for every aspect of the journal's management, from selecting decisions for commentary to researching, writing, editing, and producing the journal content in HTML. From 1995-2004, it covered the New York Court of Appeals. Since 2004-05, the bulletin has covered cases currently before the US Supreme Court. Bulletin content is available on this site and by (free) email subscription. See the Cornell Chronicle's 2004 article and 2007 article on this liibulletin project.

Congratulations to the 2012-2013 editorial board!

(See all 2012-13 oral argument previews; term preview)

Recent previews

Missouri v. McNeely


11-1425

Alleyne v. United States

Issue(s)

Should the Supreme Court overrule Harris v. United States and require that a jury find facts beyond a reasonable doubt in order to enhance a sentence beyond the ordinarily prescribed statutory maximum?

top


11-9335

City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. (11-1545) and Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council v. Federal Communications Commission (11-1547)

Issues

Should a court defer to the decision of an administrative agency when determining the limits of the agency’s power? Additionally, did the Federal Communications Commission exceed its power by setting timeframes on local governments for processing requests to build wireless service facilities?


11-1545

Delia v. E.M.A.

Issue

Does N.C. Gen. Stat. §108A-57 violate the anti-lien provision of the Medicaid Act as it was interpreted in Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn?

top


12-98

Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles

Issue

Whether a named plaintiff in a class action lawsuit can defeat a defendant’s attempt to remove the action to federal court, by stipulating for the named plaintiff and absent potential class members that the class will not seek damages above the $5,000,000 threshold for federal jurisdiction, even where the defendant establishe


11-1450

Gabelli v. SEC

Issue

Whether the five-year limitation for government enforcement actions begins running when the government discovered an alleged violation or when the alleged violation took place.

top


11-1274