Stuston v. U.S. (94-8988), 516 U.S. 193 (1996)
Concurrence [ Stevens ]	Dissent [ Scalia ]	Other [ Rehnquist ]
HTML version WordPerfect version	HTML version WordPerfect version	HTML version WordPerfect version

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ANTHONY LEO STUTSON

94-8988 v.

UNITED STATES on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit

ALEXIS LAWRENCE, guardian and next friend on behalf of KEMMERLYN D. LAWRENCE, a minor

94-9323v.

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit

Nos. 94-8988 and 94-9323. Decided January 8, 1996

Justice Stevens , concurring.

The Court persuasively explains why we have "the power to remand to a lower federal court any case raising a federal issue which is properly before us in our appellate capacity." No. 94-9323, at 3. That conclusion comports with a primary characteristic--and, I believe, virtue--of our discretionary authority to manage our certiorari docket: our ability to apply the "totality of the circumstances" approach that Justice Scalia finds objectionable. Post, at 15. The Court's wise disposition of these petitions falls squarely within the best traditions of its administration of that docket. I therefore join the Court's opinions.