| ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC. (96-568) 83 F.3d 118, reversed and remanded. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Syllabus | Opinion [ Scalia ] | Concurrence [ Thomas ] |
| HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
Thomas, J., concurring
JOSEPH ONCALE, PETITIONER v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, et al.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
[March 4, 1998]
Justice Thomas, concurring.
I concur because the Court stresses that in every sexual harassment case, the plaintiff must plead and ultimately prove Title VII’s statutory requirement that there be discrimination “because of . . . sex.”
 |
|
|
