| UNITED STATES V. HATTER (99-1978) 532 U.S. 557 (2001)
203 F.3d 795, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus | Opinion [ Breyer ] | Other [ Opinion of Scalia ] | Other [ Thomas ] |
| HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. TERRY J. HATTER, Jr., JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
[May 21, 2001]
Justice Thomas, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
I believe this Court was correct in Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920), when it held that any tax that reduces a judge’s net compensation violates Article III of the Constitution. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals in its entirety.