skip navigation
search

Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (No. 651)
101 F.2d 774, modified and affirmed.
Syllabus

Opinion
[ Roberts ]
Separate
[ Stone ]
Concurrence
[ Hughes ]
Dissent
[ Mcreynolds ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

MCREYNOLDS, J., Dissenting Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


307 U.S. 496

Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT


No. 651 Argued: February 27, 28, 1939 --- Decided: June 5, 1939

MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS, dissenting:

I am of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the bill. In the circumstances disclosed, I conclude that the District Court should have refused to interfere by injunction with the essential rights of the municipality to control its own parks and streets. Wise management of such intimate local affairs, generally at least, is beyond the competency of federal courts, and essays in that direction should be avoided [p533]

There was ample opportunity for respondents to assert their claims through an orderly proceeding in Courts of the state empowered authoritatively to interpret her laws with final review here in respect of federal questions.