skip navigation
search

Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (No. 522)
303 N.Y. 242, 101 N.E.2d 665, reversed.
Syllabus

Opinion
[ Clark ]
Concurrence
[ Reed ]
Concurrence
[ Frankfurter ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

REED, J., Concurring Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


343 U.S. 495

Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK


No. 522 Argued: April 24, 1952 --- Decided: May 26, 1952

MR. JUSTICE REED, concurring in the judgment of the Court.

Assuming that a state may establish a system for the licensing of motion pictures, an issue not foreclosed by the Court's opinion, our duty requires us to examine the facts of the refusal of a license in each case to determine [p507] whether the principles of the First Amendment have been honored. This film does not seem to me to be of a character that the First Amendment permits a state to exclude from public view.