skip navigation
search

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (No. 21)
383 F.2d 988, reversed and remanded.
Syllabus

Opinion
[ Fortas ]
Concurrence
[ Stewart ]
Concurrence
[ White ]
Dissent
[ Black ]
Dissent
[ Harlan ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

WHITE, J., Concurring Opinion, Concurring Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


393 U.S. 503

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District


No. 21 Argued: November 12, 1968 --- Decided: February 24, 1969

MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring.

While I join the Court's opinion, I deem it appropriate to note, first, that the Court continues to recognize a distinction between communicating by words and communicating by acts or conduct which sufficiently impinges on some valid state interest; and, second, that I do not subscribe to everything the Court of Appeals said about free speech in its opinion in Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744, 748 (C.A. 5th Cir.1966), a case relied upon by the Court in the matter now before us.