| Stanley v. Georgia
(No. 293)
224 Ga. 259, 161 S.E.2d 309, reversed and remanded. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus
| Opinion
[ Marshall ] | Concurrence
[ Black ] | Concurrence
[ Stewart ] |
| HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
Stanley v. Georgia
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, concurring.
I agree with the Court that the mere possession of reading matter or movie films, whether labeled obscene or not, cannot be made a crime by a State without violating [p569] the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth. My reasons for this belief have been set out in many of my prior opinions, as for example, Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 155 (concurring opinion), and Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463, 476 (dissenting opinion).




