skip navigation


Davis v. Alaska (No. 72-5794)
___
Syllabus

Opinion
[ Burger ]
Concurrence
[ Stewart ]
Dissent
[ White ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

STEWART, J., Concurring Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


415 U.S. 308

Davis v. Alaska

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA


No. 72-5794 Argued: December 12, 1973 --- Decided: February 27, 1974

MR. JUSTICE STEWART, concurring.

The Court holds that, in the circumstances of this case, the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments conferred the right to cross-examine a particular prosecution witness about his delinquency adjudication for burglary and his status as a probationer. Such cross-examination was necessary in this case in order "to show the existence of possible bias and prejudice . . . ," ante at 317. In joining the Court's opinion, I would emphasize that the Court neither holds nor suggests that the Constitution confers a right in every case to impeach the general credibility of a witness through cross-examination about his past delinquency adjudications or criminal convictions.