skip navigation
search

Puerto Rico v. Branstad (No. 85-2116)
___
Syllabus

Opinion
[ Marshall ]
Concurrence
[ O'Connor ]
Concurrence
[ Scalia ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

O'CONNOR, J., Concurring Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


483 U.S. 219

Puerto Rico v. Branstad

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT


No. 85-2116 Argued: March 30, 1987 --- Decided: June 23, 1987

JUSTICE O'CONNOR, with whom JUSTICE POWELL joins, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

I join Parts I, II-A, II-C, and III of the Court's opinion. Because the Court ultimately resolves this case under the [p231] Extradition Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3182 I do not find Part II-B, and its statements concerning the Extradition Clause of the Constitution, necessary to the decision of this case. Accordingly, I do not subscribe to that part of the Court's opinion. See, e.g., Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846, 854 (1985); Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 361, n. 10 (1983); Ashwander v. TVA, 297 U.S. 288, 347 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring).