Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory

Did you mean natural and resource or department and interior?

Your query (natural and resource) or (department and interior) returned 25 results.

	DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN. [Syllabus] Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5.
	FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999) [Syllabus]
	NATIONAL PARK HOSPITALITY ASSN. V.DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR [Syllabus] Whether the Contract Disputed Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, applies to contracts between the National Park Service and private parties for the development, operation, and maintenance of concessions, such as restaurants, lodges, and gift shops, in the national parks.
	MYERS V. UNITED STATES [Dissent]
	IN RE NEAGLE [Opinion]
	LUJAN V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE [Opinion]
	INS V. CHADHA [Dissent]
	MONTANA V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, 523 U.S. 696 (1998) [Syllabus]
	BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997). [Syllabus]
	MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCINGSOUTHEAST, INC. V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding-contrary to decisions of this Court, other courts of appeals, and state courts, as well as the Restatements and leading treatises-that petitioner could not receive restitution of the $78 million paid to the United States for oil and gas leases following the enactment of a statute, which the trial court found ""clearly reduce(d) the value and materially alter(ed) the structure and framework"" of those leases, because (1) petitioner had not proved that this material breach of its leases caused it any injury and (2) Congress repealed the statute after petitioner filed suit asserting material breach?"
	MICHIGAN DEP'T OF STATE POLICE V. SITZ [Dissent]
	YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER [Concurrence]
	SOUTH DAKOTA V. OPPERMAN [Concurrence]
	LEHMAN V. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS [Dissent]
	******** [Opinion]
	MICHIGAN V. LONG [Opinion]
	NORTON V. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE [Syllabus] Whether the authority of the federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(1), to "compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" extends to the review of the adequacy of an agency's ongoing management of public lands under general statutory standards and its own land use plans?
	ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA [Syllabus]
	PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT [Syllabus] 1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
	WILLIAMS V. LEE [Opinion]
	YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER [Dissent]
	LUJAN V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE [Dissent]
	BAKER V. CARR [Dissent]
	WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE V. BRACKER [Opinion]
	SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA [Opinion]
	SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. PINK [Opinion]
	REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF CAL. V. BAKKE [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. E. C. KNIGHT COMPANY [Dissent]
	LLOYD CORP., LTD. V. TANNER [Opinion]
	CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLA. V. LEAVITT [Syllabus]
	GIBBONS V. OGDEN [Opinion]
	BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. V. BURTON [Syllabus]
	CLARK V. COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NONVIOLENCE [Opinion]
	BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
	AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE [Syllabus]
	SALAZAR V. BUONO [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. JICARILLA APACHE NATION [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION [Syllabus] Under United States v. Mitchell, 445 U. S. 535, and United States v. Mitchell, 463 U. S. 206, the Navajo Tribe's claim for compensation from the Government based on the Interior Secretary's actions with respect to a coal lease between the Tribe and a private lessee fails, for it does not derive from any liability-imposing provision of the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 or its implementing regulations.
	TALBOT V. JANSON [Syllabus]
	CARTER V. CARTER COAL CO. [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. ROSS [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. LOVETT [Opinion]
	STEARNS V. MINNESOTA [Opinion]
	BERMAN V. PARKER [Opinion]
	POLLOCK V. FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY [Opinion]
	[Syllabus]
	NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE [Syllabus]
	NASA V. FLRA [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	LLOYD CORP., LTD. V. TANNER [Dissent]
	BOWSHER V. SYNAR [Opinion]
	ALLEN V. WRIGHT [Dissent]
	UNITED STATES V. MORRISON [Opinion]
	HOLDEN V. HARDY [Opinion]
	WORCESTER V. GEORGIA [Opinion]
	WASHINGTON V. CHRISMAN [Opinion]
	WORCESTER V. GEORGIA [Concurrence]
	WISCONSIN V. YODER [Opinion]
	DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN. [Syllabus] Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5.
	FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999) [Syllabus]
	NATIONAL PARK HOSPITALITY ASSN. V.DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR [Syllabus] Whether the Contract Disputed Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, applies to contracts between the National Park Service and private parties for the development, operation, and maintenance of concessions, such as restaurants, lodges, and gift shops, in the national parks.
	MONTANA V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, 523 U.S. 696 (1998) [Syllabus]
	AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE [Syllabus]
	BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997). [Syllabus]
	MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCINGSOUTHEAST, INC. V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding-contrary to decisions of this Court, other courts of appeals, and state courts, as well as the Restatements and leading treatises-that petitioner could not receive restitution of the $78 million paid to the United States for oil and gas leases following the enactment of a statute, which the trial court found ""clearly reduce(d) the value and materially alter(ed) the structure and framework"" of those leases, because (1) petitioner had not proved that this material breach of its leases caused it any injury and (2) Congress repealed the statute after petitioner filed suit asserting material breach?"
	NORTON V. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE [Syllabus] Whether the authority of the federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(1), to "compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" extends to the review of the adequacy of an agency's ongoing management of public lands under general statutory standards and its own land use plans?
	ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA [Syllabus]
	PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT [Syllabus] 1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
	CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLA. V. LEAVITT [Syllabus]
	BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. V. BURTON [Syllabus]
	MINNESOTA V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS [Syllabus]
	BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus] Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
	SALAZAR V. BUONO [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. JICARILLA APACHE NATION [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION [Syllabus] Under United States v. Mitchell, 445 U. S. 535, and United States v. Mitchell, 463 U. S. 206, the Navajo Tribe's claim for compensation from the Government based on the Interior Secretary's actions with respect to a coal lease between the Tribe and a private lessee fails, for it does not derive from any liability-imposing provision of the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 or its implementing regulations.
	[Syllabus]
	NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE [Syllabus]
	NASA V. FLRA [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997). [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]