skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Did you mean natural and resource or department and interior?

Your query (natural and resource) or (department and interior) returned 25 results.

1000 DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN.
[Syllabus]
Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5.
935 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999)
[Syllabus]
896 NATIONAL PARK HOSPITALITY ASSN. V.DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
[Syllabus]
Whether the Contract Disputed Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, applies to contracts between the National Park Service and private parties for the development, operation, and maintenance of concessions, such as restaurants, lodges, and gift shops, in the national parks.
715 MYERS V. UNITED STATES
[Dissent]
695 IN RE NEAGLE
[Opinion]
689 LUJAN V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
[Opinion]
669 INS V. CHADHA
[Dissent]
647 MONTANA V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, 523 U.S. 696 (1998)
[Syllabus]
579 BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997).
[Syllabus]
576 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCINGSOUTHEAST, INC. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding-contrary to decisions of this Court, other courts of appeals, and state courts, as well as the Restatements and leading treatises-that petitioner could not receive restitution of the $78 million paid to the United States for oil and gas leases following the enactment of a statute, which the trial court found ""clearly reduce(d) the value and materially alter(ed) the structure and framework"" of those leases, because (1) petitioner had not proved that this material breach of its leases caused it any injury and (2) Congress repealed the statute after petitioner filed suit asserting material breach?"
576 MICHIGAN DEP'T OF STATE POLICE V. SITZ
[Dissent]
576 YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER
[Concurrence]
537 SOUTH DAKOTA V. OPPERMAN
[Concurrence]
517 LEHMAN V. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS
[Dissent]
511 ********
[Opinion]
498 MICHIGAN V. LONG
[Opinion]
466 NORTON V. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
[Syllabus]
Whether the authority of the federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(1), to "compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" extends to the review of the adequacy of an agency's ongoing management of public lands under general statutory standards and its own land use plans?
446 ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA
[Syllabus]
446 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT
[Syllabus]
1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
446 WILLIAMS V. LEE
[Opinion]
446 YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER
[Dissent]
446 LUJAN V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
[Dissent]
433 BAKER V. CARR
[Dissent]
433 WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE V. BRACKER
[Opinion]
433 SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA
[Opinion]
433 SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA
[Opinion]
423 UNITED STATES V. PINK
[Opinion]
401 REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF CAL. V. BAKKE
[Opinion]
401 UNITED STATES V. E. C. KNIGHT COMPANY
[Dissent]
401 LLOYD CORP., LTD. V. TANNER
[Opinion]
398 CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLA. V. LEAVITT
[Syllabus]
398 GIBBONS V. OGDEN
[Opinion]
368 BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. V. BURTON
[Syllabus]
352 CLARK V. COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NONVIOLENCE
[Opinion]
333 BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
288 AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
288 SALAZAR V. BUONO
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. JICARILLA APACHE NATION
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION
[Syllabus]
Under United States v. Mitchell, 445 U. S. 535, and United States v. Mitchell, 463 U. S. 206, the Navajo Tribe's claim for compensation from the Government based on the Interior Secretary's actions with respect to a coal lease between the Tribe and a private lessee fails, for it does not derive from any liability-imposing provision of the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 or its implementing regulations.
288 TALBOT V. JANSON
[Syllabus]
288 CARTER V. CARTER COAL CO.
[Opinion]
288 UNITED STATES V. ROSS
[Opinion]
288 UNITED STATES V. LOVETT
[Opinion]
288 STEARNS V. MINNESOTA
[Opinion]
288 BERMAN V. PARKER
[Opinion]
288 POLLOCK V. FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY
[Opinion]
223
[Syllabus]
223 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE
[Syllabus]
223 NASA V. FLRA
[Syllabus]
223 UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997).
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]
223 LLOYD CORP., LTD. V. TANNER
[Dissent]
223 BOWSHER V. SYNAR
[Opinion]
223 ALLEN V. WRIGHT
[Dissent]
223 UNITED STATES V. MORRISON
[Opinion]
223 HOLDEN V. HARDY
[Opinion]
223 WORCESTER V. GEORGIA
[Opinion]
223 WASHINGTON V. CHRISMAN
[Opinion]
223 WORCESTER V. GEORGIA
[Concurrence]
223 WISCONSIN V. YODER
[Opinion]
1000 DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN.
[Syllabus]
Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5.
935 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999)
[Syllabus]
896 NATIONAL PARK HOSPITALITY ASSN. V.DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
[Syllabus]
Whether the Contract Disputed Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, applies to contracts between the National Park Service and private parties for the development, operation, and maintenance of concessions, such as restaurants, lodges, and gift shops, in the national parks.
647 MONTANA V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, 523 U.S. 696 (1998)
[Syllabus]
621 AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
579 BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997).
[Syllabus]
576 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCINGSOUTHEAST, INC. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding-contrary to decisions of this Court, other courts of appeals, and state courts, as well as the Restatements and leading treatises-that petitioner could not receive restitution of the $78 million paid to the United States for oil and gas leases following the enactment of a statute, which the trial court found ""clearly reduce(d) the value and materially alter(ed) the structure and framework"" of those leases, because (1) petitioner had not proved that this material breach of its leases caused it any injury and (2) Congress repealed the statute after petitioner filed suit asserting material breach?"
466 NORTON V. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
[Syllabus]
Whether the authority of the federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(1), to "compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" extends to the review of the adequacy of an agency's ongoing management of public lands under general statutory standards and its own land use plans?
446 ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA
[Syllabus]
446 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT
[Syllabus]
1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
398 CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLA. V. LEAVITT
[Syllabus]
368 BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. V. BURTON
[Syllabus]
333 MINNESOTA V. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS
[Syllabus]
333 BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
288 SALAZAR V. BUONO
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. JICARILLA APACHE NATION
[Syllabus]
288
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION
[Syllabus]
Under United States v. Mitchell, 445 U. S. 535, and United States v. Mitchell, 463 U. S. 206, the Navajo Tribe's claim for compensation from the Government based on the Interior Secretary's actions with respect to a coal lease between the Tribe and a private lessee fails, for it does not derive from any liability-imposing provision of the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 or its implementing regulations.
223
[Syllabus]
223 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE
[Syllabus]
223 NASA V. FLRA
[Syllabus]
223 UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 117 S.CT. 1888, 138 L.ED.2D 231 (1997).
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]
223
[Syllabus]