Search

Search results

1. FTC v. ACTAVIS, INC.

   determining the scope of monopoly and antitrust immunity conferred by a patent, see, e.g., United States v. ... the patent monopoly”—and consequently antitrust law immunity—that is conferred by a patent. Thus, the ... Solvay’s monopoly profits. The District Court dismissed the complaint. The Eleventh Circuit concluded that ...

2. FTC v. ACTAVIS, INC.

   determining the scope of monopoly and antitrust immunity conferred by a patent, see, e.g., United States v. ... the patent monopoly”—and consequently antitrust law immunity—that is conferred by a patent. Thus, the ... Solvay’s monopoly profits. The District Court dismissed the complaint. The Eleventh Circuit concluded that ...

3. Walter C. BRULOTTE et al., petitioners, v. THYS COMPANY.

   a license agreement a provision which perpetuates the monopoly of a licensed patent by a requirement that ... dedicated to the public. '2. Whether it is a misuse or an antitrust violation to include in a license ... agreement a provision which extends the monopoly of a patent to unpatented subject matter by a provision ...

4. 540 U.S. 736

   and create a monopoly in mail sack production. The District Court dismissed the antitrust claims, ... concluding that the Postal Service is not subject to liability under federal antitrust law. The Ninth Circuit ... reversed, holding that the Postal Service can be liable but that it has a limited immunity from antitrust ...

5. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. ALSTON et al.

   antitrust lawsuit challenging the NCAA’s restrictions on compensation. Specifically, they alleged that the ... restraints on athlete compensation survive antitrust scrutiny. The student-athletes have not renewed their ... is consistent with established antitrust principles. Pp. 15–36. (a) The courts below properly ...

6. ONEOK, INC. v. LEARJET, INC.

   pipelines, claiming that the pipelines had engaged in behavior that violated state antitrust laws. In ... prices. Held: Respondents’ state-law antitrust claims are not within the field of matters pre-empted by ... “traditional” state regulation, such as blue sky laws. Id., at 308, n. 11. Antitrust laws, like blue sky laws, ...

7. CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al.

   Northwest filed a motion to dismiss the antitrust suit or to stay it, pending completion of the proceedings ... antitrust suit. On July 29, 1958, the Department of Justice was advised by the Commission that it would not ... stay its proceedings. The Commission invited the Antitrust Division of the Department to participate in ...

8. APPLE INC. v. PEPPER

   a monopolistic retailer (here, Apple) has used its monopoly to overcharge consumers is a classic antitrust claim. ... 1890, “protecting consumers from monopoly prices” has been “the central concern of antitrust.” 2A Areeda ... antitrust laws and from this Court’s precedent. Section 4 of the Clayton Act provides that “any person who ...

9. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. LAW OFFICESOF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP

   LECs’ monopoly and to introduce competition in its place. Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC, 535 U. S. ... As to the antitrust portion, it concluded that respondent’s allegations of deficient ... reinstated the complaint in part, including the antitrust claim. 305 F. 3d 89, 113 (2002). We granted ...

10. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA and National Broadcasting Company, Inc.

    convicted under the Sherman antitrust law or any other law relating to monopoly he shall be denied ... civil antitrust action brought by the Government under § 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 4, 15 U.S.C.A. ... antitrust laws. The Government's complaint generally alleged the following facts. In 1954, National ...

Pages