skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query administrative returned 233 results.

Your search has returned a large number of results. You might want to consider using additional terms to narrow it.

1000 BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. V. BURTON
[Syllabus]
904 GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATIONDIST. V.UNITED STATES EX REL. WILSON
[Syllabus]
884 BOOTH V. CHURNER
[Syllabus]
Under 42 U. S. C. §1997e(a), an inmate seeking only money damages must complete any prison administrative process capable of addressing the inmate's complaint and providing some form of relief, even if the process does not make specific provision for monetary relief.
840 WOODFORD V. NGO
[Syllabus]
817
[Syllabus]
763 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMN V. SOUTH CAROLINAPORTS AUTHORITY
[Syllabus]
State sovereign immunity bars the Federal Maritime Commission from adjudicating a private party's complaint against a nonconsenting State.
734
[Syllabus]
699 CITY OF CHICAGO V. INTERN'L COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 522 U.S. 156 (1997)
[Syllabus]
661 UNITED STATES V. CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING CO.
[Syllabus]
619 SHALALA V. ILLINOIS COUNCIL ON LONGTERM CARE, INC.
[Syllabus]
Whether 42 U.S.C. 405H(h), incorporated into the Medicare Act by 42 U.S.C. 1395ii, permits skilled nursing facilities participating in the Medicare program to obtain judicial review under 28 U.S.C.1331 and 1346 (1994 & Supp. II 1996) to challenge the validity of Medicare regulations.
619 KUCANA V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
619 HUMANA INC. V. FORSYTH
[Syllabus]
619 SIMS V. APFEL
[Syllabus]
May a federal court, without any statutory or regulatory authority in support thereof, and contrary to the informal non-adversarial nature of the Social Security administrative appeal process, impose an ''issue exhaistion"" requirement upon Social Security claimants in federal court to bar issues that were not specifically raised by the claimant during the administrative appeal process."
619
[Syllabus]
571
[Syllabus]
571 ZADVYDAS V. DAVIS
[Syllabus]
The post-removal-period detention statute, read in light of the Constitution's demands, implicitly limits an alien's detention to a period reasonably necessary to bring about that alien's removal from the United States, and does not permit indefinite detention; the application of that limitation is subject to federal court review.
571 UNITED STATES V. MEAD CORP.
[Syllabus]
A Customs ruling letter has no claim to deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837, but, under Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U. S. 134, it is eligible to claim respect according to its persuasiveness.
571 WILKIE V. ROBBINS
[Syllabus]
511 PRESTON V. FERRER
[Syllabus]
511 VAN V. GOLDSTEIN
[Syllabus]
511 WINKELMAN V. PARMA CITY SCHOOL DIST.
[Syllabus]
511 SCHAFFER V. WEAST
[Syllabus]
511 ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION V. EPA
[Syllabus]
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in upholding the EPA's assertion of authority to second-guess a permitting decision made by the State of Alaska--which had been delegated permitting authority under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.--in conflict with decisions of this Court and other federal courts of appeals establishing the division of federal-state jurisdiction under the Act and similar statutory programs.
511 PORTER V. NUSSLE
[Syllabus]
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995's exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege corrections officers' use of excessive force or some other wrong.
511 WEST V. GIBSON
[Syllabus]
511
[Syllabus]
511 C.I.R. V. ESTATE OF HUBERT, 520 U.S. 93 (1997)
[Syllabus]
511
[Syllabus]
511
[Syllabus]
511
[Syllabus]
440 GEBSER V. LAGO VISTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST., 524 U.S. 274 (1998)
[Syllabus]
440 SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK CTY. V.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
[Syllabus]
Whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, consistent with the Clean Waters Act and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, may assert jurisdiction over isolated intrastate waters solely because those waters solely because those waters do or potentially could serve as habitat of migratory birds."
440 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTHSERVS. V. GUARDIANSHIP ESTATE OF KEFFELER
[Syllabus]
Washington State's use of respondent foster children's Social Security benefits to reimburse the State for expenses in caring for respondents did not violate 42 U. S. C. §407(a).
440 UNITED STATES V. NAVAJO NATION
[Syllabus]
Under United States v. Mitchell, 445 U. S. 535, and United States v. Mitchell, 463 U. S. 206, the Navajo Tribe's claim for compensation from the Government based on the Interior Secretary's actions with respect to a coal lease between the Tribe and a private lessee fails, for it does not derive from any liability-imposing provision of the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 or its implementing regulations.
440 FDA V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.
[Syllabus]
Whether, given FDA's findings, tobacco products are subject to regulation under the Act as ""drugs"" and ""devices.
440 HENDERSON V. SHINSEKI
[Syllabus]
440 UNITED STATES V. WILLIAMS, 514 U.S. 527 (1995).
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 MCCONNELL V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMN
[Syllabus]
440 HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS. CO. V. UNIONPLANTERS BANK, N. A.
[Syllabus]
Does a postpetition administrative creditor in a bankruptcy case have standing under 11 U.S.C. 506© to seek payment of its administrative claim from property of the bankruptcy estate that is encumbered by a secured creditor's lien?"
440 EC TERM OF YEARS TRUST V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
440 HERTZ CORP. V. FRIEND
[Syllabus]
348 DADA V. MUKASEY
[Syllabus]
348 SHINSEKI V. SANDERS
[Syllabus]
348 LUJAN V. NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, 497 U.S. 871 (1990)
[Syllabus]
348 YOUR HOME VISITING NURSE SERVICES, INC. V. SHALALA
[Syllabus]
348 AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. V. WINDSOR, 117 S.CT. 2231, 138 L.ED.2D 689 (1997).
[Syllabus]
348 BRAGDON V. ABBOTT, 524 U.S. 624 (1998)
[Syllabus]
348 INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, 519 U.S. 248 (1997)
[Syllabus]
348 INTEL CORP. V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
348 ALLENTOWN MACK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. V. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359 (1998)
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 CHEVRON U.S. A. INC. V. ECHAZABAL
[Syllabus]
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 permits an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation authorizing an employer to refuse to hire a disabled individual because his performance on the job would endanger his own health.
348
[Syllabus]
348 AUER V. ROBBINS, 519 U.S. 452 (1997).
[Syllabus]
348 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. V. AVIALL SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
348 UNITED STATES V. CLEVELAND INDIANSBASEBALL CO.
[Syllabus]
Back wages are subject to FICA and FUTA taxes by reference to the year the wages are in fact paid.
348 NATIONAL PARK HOSPITALITY ASSN. V.DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
[Syllabus]
Whether the Contract Disputed Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, applies to contracts between the National Park Service and private parties for the development, operation, and maintenance of concessions, such as restaurants, lodges, and gift shops, in the national parks.
348 GONZALES V. OREGON
[Syllabus]
348 BARNHART V. THOMAS
[Syllabus]
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act define disability as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. 42 U.S.C. 423(d)(1)(A); 42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)(A). The Act further provides that a claimant shall be determined to be under a disability only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy. 42 U.S.C. 423(d)(2)(A); 42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)(B). Under the Act, work which exists in the national economy means work which exists in significant numbers either in the region where such individual lives or in several regions in the country. 42 U.S.C. 423(d)(2)(A); 42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)(B). The question presented is: Whether the Commissioner of Social Security may determine that a claimant is not disabled within the meaning of the Act because the claimant remains physically and mentally able to do her previous work, without considering whether that particular job exists in significant numbers in the national economy.
348 ASTRA USA, INC. V.SANTA CLARA COUNTY
[Syllabus]
348 CITY NEWS & NOVELTY, INC. V. WAUKESHA
[Syllabus]
Is a licensing scheme which acts as a prior restraint required to contain explicit language which prevents injury to a speaker's rights from want of a prompt judicial decision?"
348 MEDTRONIC, INC. V. LOHR ET VIR, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).
[Syllabus]
348 BLACK & DECKER DISABILITY PLAN V. NORD
[Syllabus]
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that an ERISA disability plan administrator's determination of disability is subject to the treating physician rule and, therefore, the plan administrator is required to accept a treating physician's opinion of disability as controlling unless the plan administrator rebuts that opinion in writing based upon substantial evidence on the record.
348
[Syllabus]
348 JONES V. BOCK
[Syllabus]
348 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. V. FLOR-IDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 FITZGERALD V. BARNSTABLE SCHOOL COMM.
[Syllabus]
348 U.S. V. BROCKAMP, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MCGILL, DECEASED, 519 U.S. 347 (1997)
[Syllabus]
348 STONE V. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995).
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 OHIO FORESTRY ASSN., INC. V. SIERRA CLUB, 523 U.S. 726 (1998)
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 CITIZENS BANK OF MARYLAND V. STRUMPF, 516 U.S. 16 (1995).
[Syllabus]
348 UNITED STATES V. NOLAND, 517 U.S. 535 (1996)
[Syllabus]
348 PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORP. V. THE LTV CORP., 496 U.S. 633 (1990)
[Syllabus]
348 JERMAN V. CARLISLE, MCNELLIE, RINI,KRAMER & ULRICH LPA
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 CUYAHOGA FALLS V. BUCKEYE COMMUNITYHOPE FOUNDATION
[Syllabus]
Respondents have presented no genuine issues of material fact with regard to whether Cuyahoga Falls violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses by submitting to voters a facially neutral referendum petition calling for the repeal of a municipal ordinance authorizing construction of a low-income housing complex.
348 NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSN. V.BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES
[Syllabus]
348 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. V. UNITED STATESEX REL. KIRK
[Syllabus]
348 RAGSDALE V. WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.
[Syllabus]
A Labor Department regulation requiring an employer to grant an additional 12 weeks of leave to an employee who has not been informed that a previous absence would be counted as part of the 12 weeks of leave guaranteed by the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 is contrary to the Act and beyond the Labor Secretary's authority.
348 CITY OF LITTLETON V. Z.J. GIFTS D4, L.L.C.
[Syllabus]
Whether the requirement of prompt judicial review imposed by FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990), entails a prompt judicial determination or a prompt commencement of judicial proceedings?
348
[Syllabus]
348 CLINTON V. GOLDSMITH
[Syllabus]
348
[Syllabus]
348 SULLIVAN V. FINKELSTEIN, 496 U.S. 617 (1990)
[Syllabus]
220 ASHCROFT V. AL-KIDD
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 HUDSON V. UNITED STATES, 522 U.S. 93 (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 HUBBARD V. UNITED STATES, 514 U.S. 695 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220 OHIO V. AKRON CENTER, 497 U.S. 502 (1990)
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 BUCKLEY V. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
[Syllabus]
220 HEIN V. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
[Syllabus]
220 RAYMOND B. YATES, M.D., P.C. PROFIT SHARINGPLAN V. HENDON
[Syllabus]
Whether the working owner of a business (here, the sole shareholder of a corporate employer) is precluded from being a "participant" under Section 3(7) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1002(7), in an ERISA plan?
220
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. UNITED FOODS, INC.
[Syllabus]
The Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act's requirement that fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertising promoting mushroom sales violates the First Amendment.
220
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. HAGGAR APPAREL CO.
[Syllabus]
220 LACKAWANNA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYV. COSS
[Syllabus]
Title 28 U. S. C. §2254 does not provide a remedy when a state prisoner challenges a current sentence on the ground that it was enhanced based on an allegedly unconstitutional prior conviction for which the petitioner is no longer in custody.
220 SINOCHEM INTL CO. V. MALAYSIA INTL SHIPPINGCORP.
[Syllabus]
220 BLESSING V. FREESTONE, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB
[Syllabus]
Federal immigration policy, as expressed in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, foreclosed the National Labor Relations Board from awarding backpay to an undocumented alien who was never legally authorized to work in the United States.
220 BURLINGTON N. & S. F.R.CO. V. WHITE
[Syllabus]
220 GONZAGA UNIV. V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Respondent's action is foreclosed because the relevant provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 create no personal rights to enforce under 42 U. S. C. §1983.
220 BENNETT V. SPEAR, 520 U.S. 154 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220 LONG ISLAND CARE AT HOME, LTD. V. COKE
[Syllabus]
220 METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 117 S.CT. 1953, 138 L.ED.2D 327 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220 CORLEY V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
220 THOMPSON V. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP
[Syllabus]
220 GRATZ V. BOLLINGER
[Syllabus]
1. Does the University of Michigan's use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.2000d), or 42 U.S.C. 1981?
220 BALLARD V. COMMISSIONER
[Syllabus]
220 VARITY CORP. V. HOWE ET AL., 516 U.S. 489 (1996).
[Syllabus]
220 METRO BROADCASTING, INC. V. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990)
[Syllabus]
220 MORSE V. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, 517 U.S. 186 (1996).
[Syllabus]
220 AMERICAN INS. ASSN. V. GARAMENDI
[Syllabus]
California's Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act (HVIRA) requires California insurers to provide extensive information regarding every insurance policy issued in Nazi dominated Europe between 1920 and 1945 by any insurer with which the California insurer now has a legal relationship. The district court enjoined enforcement of the Act on three constitutional grounds: interference with the federal government's power over foreign affairs, due process, and the Foreign Commerce Clause. Over the objections of the U.S. government and affected foreign governments, and in direct conflict with Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Gallagher, 267 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2001), the Ninth Circuit reversed and upheld the HVIRA in all respects. 1. Whether the HVIRA, which the U.S. government has called an actual interference with U.S. foreign policy, and which affected foreign governments have protested as inconsistent with international agreements, violates the foreign affairs doctrine of Zschering v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968). 2. Whether the HVIRA, which attempts to regulate insurance transactions that occurred overseas between foreign parties more than half a century ago, exceeds California's legislative jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause. 3. Whether the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. 1011-1015, insulates the HVIRA form review under the Foreign Commerce Clause.
220 AGOSTINI V. FELTON, 117 S.CT. 1997, 138 L.ED.2D 391 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. V. F.C.C., 520 U.S. 180 (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 BE&K CONSTR. CO. V. NLRB
[Syllabus]
Respondent National Labor Relations Board lacked authority to find that petitioner violated federal labor law by prosecuting against respondent unions an unsuccessful lawsuit with a retaliatory motive.
220 LUNDING V. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL, 522 U.S. 287 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. #1 V. REDDING
[Syllabus]
220 INS V. AGUIRRE-AGUIRRE
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENTGROUP, INC.
[Syllabus]
1. Whether Section 505 violates the First Amendment. 2. Whether the three-judge district court was divested of jurisdiction to dispose of the government's post- judgment motions under Rule 59 (e) and 60 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the government's filing of a notice of appeal while those motion were pending.
220
[Syllabus]
220 FCC V. NEXTWAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS INC.
[Syllabus]
Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits the Federal Communications Commission from revoking licenses held by a bankruptcy debtor upon the debtor's failure to make timely payments to the FCC for purchase of the licenses.
220 ARKANSAS V. FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, 520 U.S. 821 (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 CHEROKEE NATION OF OKLA. V. LEAVITT
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 FCC V. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC.
[Syllabus]
220 BOGAN V. SCOTT-HARRIS, 523 U.S. 44 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 NEW YORK STATE CONFERENCE OF BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD PLANS V. TRAVELERS, 514 U.S. 645 (1995)
[Syllabus]
220 HARDT V. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS. CO.
[Syllabus]
220 SKINNER V. SWITZER
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 TAYLOR V. STURGELL
[Syllabus]
220 DICKINSON V. ZURKO
[Syllabus]
220 ATLANTIC MUT. INS. CO. V. COMMISSIONER, 523 U.S. 382 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., 523 U.S. 360 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 REGIONS HOSPITAL V. SHALALA, 522 U.S. 448 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 BARNHART V. WALTON
[Syllabus]
The Social Security Administration's interpretations of the Social Security Act provisions that authorize payment of Social Security disability benefits and Supplemental Security Income to individuals who have an "inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable . . . impairment . . . which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months," 42 U. S. C. §423(d)(1)(A); accord, §1382c(a)(3)(A), are lawful.
220
[Syllabus]
220 CHAO V. MALLARD BAY DRILLING, INC.
[Syllabus]
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's jurisdiction to issue citations to respondent barge owner was not pre-empted by the Coast Guard under §4(b)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970; and the barge in question was a "workplace" covered by the Act.
220 ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA
[Syllabus]
220 CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSN. V. FTC
[Syllabus]
220 VIRGINIA V. MARYLAND
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC. V. PUBLICUTIL. DIST. NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH CTY.
[Syllabus]
220 DUSENBERY V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
The Government's sending of notice by certified mail of a cash forfeiture to petitioner's place of incarceration satisfied his due process rights.
220
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL ED. AND RESEARCH V.UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
220 GEORGIA V. ASHCROFT
[Syllabus]
1. Whether Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Requires the Drawing of Safe Majority-Minority Districts with Super majority Minority Populations, Rather than Districts that Afford Minorities Equal Opportunities at Success? 2. Whether Section 5 can be Constitutionally Construed to require the Drawing of Supermajority Minority Legislative Districts in Order to Create Safe Seats, Rather than Seats that Afford Minorities Equal Opportunities at Success? 3. Whether Private Parties Should be Allowed to Intervene in a Section 5 Preclearance Action and Assume the Role and Authority of the Attorney General.
220 METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 515 U.S. 291 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220 COEUR ALASKA, INC. V. SOUTHEAST ALASKACONSERVATION COUNCIL
[Syllabus]
220 MILNER V. DEPARTMENT OF NAVY
[Syllabus]
220 O'NEAL V. MCANINCH, 513 U.S. 432 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220 HOHN V. UNITED STATES, 524 U.S. 236 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 FREE ENTERPRISE FUND V. PUBLIC COMPANYACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BD.
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMIN. V. FIRST NAT. BANK & TRUST CO., 522 U.S. 479 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 BUSH V. VERA, 517 U.S. 952 (1996).
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 LYNCE V. MATHIS, 519 U.S. 443 (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 SANDIN V. CONNER, 515 U.S. 472 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 BECKER V. MONTGOMERY
[Syllabus]
When a party files a timely notice of appeal in federal district court, the failure to sign the notice does not require the court of appeals to dismiss the appeal.
220 FORNEY V. APFEL, 524 U.S. 266 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 ARIZONA DEPT. OF REVENUE V. BLAZE CONSTR. CO.
[Syllabus]
220 INS V. ST. CYR
[Syllabus]
Amendments that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 made to the Immigration and Nationality Act did not affect the federal courts' habeas jurisdiction to decide pure questions of law; nor did they affect the availability of discretionary relief from deportation for aliens whose convictions were obtained through plea agreements before the amendments' effective dates.
220 PENNSYLVANIA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE V. SCOTT, 524 U.S. 357 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORP. V. MALESKO
[Syllabus]
The limited holding in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388, may not be extended to confer a right of action for damages against private entities acting under color of federal law.
220 SHALALA V. GUERNSEY MEMORIAL HOSP., 514 U.S. 87 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220 CLEVELAND V. POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORP.
[Syllabus]
220 DEPARTMENT OF ARMY V. BLUE FOX, INC.
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMN
[Syllabus]
220 GISBRECHT V. BARNHART
[Syllabus]
Title 42 U. S. C. §406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements between Social Security benefits claimants and their counsel within the ceiling set forth in §406(b)(1)(A); instead it instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those agreements.
220 WHITMAN V. AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSNS., INC.
[Syllabus]
1. Whether Section 109 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7409, as interpreted by the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) in setting revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and particulate matter, effects an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. 2. Whether the court of appeals exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing, as a final agency action that is ripe for review, EPA's preliminary preamble statements on the scope of the agency's authority to implement the revised ""eight-hour"" ozone NAAQS. 3. Whether provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 specifically aimed at achieving the long delayed attainment of the then-existing ozone NAAQS restrict EPA's general authority under other provisions of the CAA to implement a new and more protective ozone NAAQS until the prior standard is attained."
220 CHENEY V. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT FOR D. C.
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 1, §§ 1 et seq., can be construed, consistent with the Constitution, principles of separation of powers, and this Court's decisions governing judicial review of Executive Branch actions, to authorize broad discovery of the process by which the Vice President and other senior advisors gathered information to advise the President on important national policy matters, based solely on an unsupported allegation in a complaint that the advisory group was not constituted as the President expressly directed and the advisory group itself reported? (2) Whether the court of appeals had mandamus or appellate jurisdiction to review the district court's unprecedented discovery orders in this litigation?
220 COMMISSIONER V. BANKS
[Syllabus]
220 HARBOR TUG & BARGE CO. V. PAPAI ET UX., 520 U.S. 548 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220 GOMEZ-PEREZ V. POTTER
[Syllabus]
220 LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC. V.PSKS, INC.
[Syllabus]
220 BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220 EGELHOFF V. EGELHOFF
[Syllabus]
The Washington statute that provides that the designation of a spouse as the beneficiary of a nonprobate asset is revoked automatically upon divorce has a connection with ERISA plans and is therefore expressly pre-empted by ERISA.
220
[Syllabus]
220 RENO V. KORAY, 515 U.S. 39 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 POSTAL SERVICE V. GREGORY
[Syllabus]
The Merit Systems Protection Board may review independently prior disciplinary actions pending in grievance proceedings when reviewing termination and other serious disciplinary actions.
220 CBOCS WEST, INC. V. HUMPHRIES
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. BEAN
[Syllabus]
The absence of an actual denial by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms of a felon's petition for relief from firearms disabilities precludes judicial review under 18 U. S. C. §925(c).
220
[Syllabus]
220 WILKINSON V. AUSTIN
[Syllabus]
220 ALABAMA V. NORTH CAROLINA
[Syllabus]
220 550 U.S. ____ (2007)
[Syllabus]
220 DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEP'T OF LABOR V. NEWPORT
[Syllabus]
220 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT
[Syllabus]
1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
220 BOUMEDIENE V. BUSH
[Syllabus]
220 BROWN V. PLATA
[Syllabus]
220 NATIONAL ASSN. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERSOF WILDLIFE
[Syllabus]
220 AIR LINE PILOTS V. MILLER, 523 U.S. 866 (1998)
[Syllabus]
220 ABRAMS V. JOHNSON, 117 S.CT. 1925, 138 L.ED.2D 285 (1997).
[Syllabus]
220 RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE CO. V. CHERTOFF
[Syllabus]
220 ASTRUE V. RATLIFF
[Syllabus]
220 O'GILVIE MINORS V. UNITED STATES, 519 U.S. 79 (1996)
[Syllabus]
220 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF UNITED STATES OFAMERICA V. WHITING
[Syllabus]
220 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST. V.GARRET F.
[Syllabus]
220 NASA V. FLRA
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CAL.
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED STATES V. ATLANTIC RESEARCH CORP.
[Syllabus]
220 BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. OF WIS. SYSTEMV. SOUTHWORTH
[Syllabus]
Whether the First Amendment is offended by a policy or program under which public university students must pay mandatory fees that are used in part to support organizations that engage in political speech.
220 NORTON V. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
[Syllabus]
Whether the authority of the federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(1), to "compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" extends to the review of the adequacy of an agency's ongoing management of public lands under general statutory standards and its own land use plans?
220
[Syllabus]
220 FOREST GROVE SCHOOL DIST. V. T. A.
[Syllabus]
220 KENNEDY V. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR DUPONT SAV. AND INVESTMENT PLAN
[Syllabus]
220 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. V. GLENN
[Syllabus]
220 GLICKMAN V. WILEMAN BROTHERS & ELLIOTT, INC., 117 S.CT. 2130, 138 L.ED.2D (1997)
[Syllabus]
220 CUOMO V. CLEARING HOUSE ASSN., L. L. C.
[Syllabus]
220 NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE
[Syllabus]
220 KASTEN V. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP.
[Syllabus]
220 ALEXANDER V. SANDOVAL
[Syllabus]
There is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
220
[Syllabus]
220 LEBRON V. NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP., 513 U.S. 374 (1995).
[Syllabus]
220 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 751 V. BROWN GROUP, INC., 517 U.S. 544 (1996)
[Syllabus]