Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory

Your query admiralty or harbor or navigation returned 49 results.

	MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. WILANDER, 498 U.S. 337 (1991) [Syllabus]
	STEWART V. DUTRA CONSTR. CO. [Syllabus]
	PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO. V. NEW YORK CITY [Dissent]
	NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE [Syllabus]
	BARRON V. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE [Syllabus]
	NOLLAN V. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION [Dissent]
	ASHWANDER V. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY [Opinion]
	GIBBONS V. OGDEN [Opinion]
	HARBOR TUG & BARGE CO. V. PAPAI ET UX., 520 U.S. 548 (1997). [Syllabus]
	HOWLETT V. BIRKDALE SHIPPING CO., S. A., 512 U.S. 92 (1994). [Syllabus]
	MYERS V. UNITED STATES [Dissent]
	CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [Dissent]
	COOLEY V. BOARD OF WARDENS [Opinion]
	CHANDRIS, INC. V. LATSIS, 515 U.S. 347 (1995). [Syllabus]
	ASHWANDER V. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	******** [Dissent]
	IN RE DEBS [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. LOCKE [Syllabus] Whether regulations adopted by the State of Washington governing staffing and operation of oceangoing oil tankers engaged in coastal and international commerce are preempted to the extent that they conflict with international obligations of the United States and Coast Guard regulations for such tankers promulgated pursuant to federal statutes and international conventions and agreements.
	UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., 523 U.S. 360 (1998) [Syllabus]
	VIRGINIA V. MARYLAND [Syllabus]
	******** [Concurrence]
	SISSON V. RUBY, 497 U.S. 358 (1990) [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 503 U.S. 569 (1992). [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. WONG KIM ARK [Opinion]
	YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER [Concurrence]
	GIBBONS V. OGDEN [Syllabus]
	PROPRIETORS OF CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE V. PROPRIETORS OF WARREN BRIDGE [Dissent]
	GIBBONS V. OGDEN [Concurrence]
	UNITED STATES V. E. C. KNIGHT COMPANY [Dissent]
	BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. V. GORE [Opinion]
	FIRST ENGLISH EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF GLENDALE V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA [Opinion]
	BUILDING & CONSTR. TRADES COUNCIL OF THE METRO. DIST. V. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, 511 U.S. 350 (1994). [Syllabus]
	WORCESTER V. GEORGIA [Concurrence]
	COYLE V. SMITH [Opinion]
	MUNN V. ILLINOIS [Opinion]
	KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES [Dissent]
	COOLEY V. BOARD OF WARDENS [Syllabus]
	REID V. COVERT [Opinion]
	BATSON V. KENTUCKY [Dissent]
	ASHWANDER V. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY [Syllabus]
	FLETCHER V. PECK [Syllabus]
	WILLSON V. BLACK BIRD CREEK MARSH COMPANY [Syllabus]
	WILSON V. NEW [Dissent]
	PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER V. ROBINS [Opinion]
	YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER [Dissent]
	UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ [Concurrence]
	LOUISIANA V. MISSISSIPPI, 516 U.S. 22 (1995) [Syllabus]
	SHANNON V. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 573 (1994). [Syllabus]
	METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 117 S.CT. 1953, 138 L.ED.2D 327 (1997). [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. BALSYS, 524 U.S. 666 (1998) [Syllabus]
	GENTILE V. STATE BAR OF NEVADA, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991) [Syllabus]
	ALASKA V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
	BATH IRON WORKS V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 506 [Syllabus]
	LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS V.PERRY [Syllabus]
	ESTATE OF COWART V. NICKLOS DRILLING, 505 U.S. 469 (1992). [Syllabus]
	NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORP.V. GARRIS [Syllabus] The general maritime cause of action recognized in Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 374, 409__for dealth caused by violation of maritime duties__is available for the negligent breach of a maritime dutry of care.
	GEORGE V. SOUTH CAROLINA, 497 U.S. 396 (1990) [Syllabus]
	DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEP'T OF LABOR V. NEWPORT [Syllabus]
	DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DOL V. GREENWICH COLLIERIES, 512 U.S. 267 (1994) [Syllabus]
	KANSAS V. HENDRICKS, 117 S.CT. 2072, 138 L.ED.2D 501 (1997). [Syllabus]
	METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 515 U.S. 291 (1995). [Syllabus]
	INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, 519 U.S. 248 (1997) [Syllabus]
	MERCK KGAA V. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD. [Syllabus]
	HEAD MONEY CASES [Opinion]
	IN RE NEAGLE [Dissent]
	SCOTT V. SANDFORD [Dissent]
	NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES V. USERY [Dissent]
	******** [Dissent]
	MARTIN V. HUNTER'S LESSEE [Syllabus]
	CARTER V. CARTER COAL CO. [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	POLLOCK V. FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	WILSON V. NEW [Dissent]
	TERRY V. OHIO [Opinion]
	QUILL CORP. V. NORTH DAKOTA BY AND THROUGH HEITKAMP [Opinion]
	CLINTON V. CITY OF NEW YORK [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	SELECTIVE DRAFT LAW CASES [Opinion]
	TEXAS V. JOHNSON [Dissent]
	DAVIS V. ALASKA [Opinion]
	HURON PORTLAND CEMENT CO. V. CITY OF DETROIT [Syllabus]
	COHENS V. VIRGINIA [Syllabus]
	TINKER V. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST. [Dissent]
	CALIFORNIA V. CARNEY [Dissent]
	******** [Opinion]
	SOUTH DAKOTA V. OPPERMAN [Dissent]
	NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	GEORGIA V. MCCOLLUM [Concurrence]
	NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	CABELL V. CHAVEZ-SALIDO [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. LIBELLANTS AND CLAIMANTS OF THE SCHOONER AMISTAD [Syllabus]
	CARTER V. CARTER COAL CO. [Opinion]
	PROPRIETORS OF CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE V. PROPRIETORS OF WARREN BRIDGE [Syllabus]
	LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL [Dissent]
	SCOTT V. SANDFORD [Opinion]
	INS V. CHADHA [Dissent]
	REID V. COVERT [Concurrence]
	THE POCKET VETO CASE [Opinion]
	SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. V. DOE [Opinion]
	NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES [Dissent]
	PROPRIETORS OF CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE V. PROPRIETORS OF WARREN BRIDGE [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	CLINTON V. CITY OF NEW YORK [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	POLLOCK V. FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY [Opinion]
	GLIDDEN CO. V. ZDANOK [Opinion]
	******** [Dissent]
	ROMER V. EVANS [Opinion]
	ADAIR V. UNITED STATES [Opinion]
	COOLEY V. BOARD OF WARDENS [Dissent]
	NOLLAN V. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION [Opinion]
	ASHCROFT V. FREE SPEECH COALITION [Opinion]
	BUMPER V. NORTH CAROLINA [Dissent]
	PLESSY V. FERGUSON [Dissent]
	NORTHERN PIPELINE CONSTR. CO. V. MARATHON PIPE LINE CO. [Opinion]
	LORETTO V. TELEPROMPTER MANHATTAN CATV CORP. [Opinion]
	UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ [Dissent]
	WORCESTER V. GEORGIA [Opinion]
	CARTER V. CARTER COAL CO. [Concur in part, dissent in part]
	HURON PORTLAND CEMENT CO. V. CITY OF DETROIT [Opinion]
	ROSTKER V. GOLDBERG [Dissent]
	CAREY V. POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL [Dissent]
	WITHERSPOON V. ILLINOIS [Opinion]
	******** [Dissent]
	MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. WILANDER, 498 U.S. 337 (1991) [Syllabus]
	STEWART V. DUTRA CONSTR. CO. [Syllabus]
	NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MAINE [Syllabus]
	HARBOR TUG & BARGE CO. V. PAPAI ET UX., 520 U.S. 548 (1997). [Syllabus]
	HOWLETT V. BIRKDALE SHIPPING CO., S. A., 512 U.S. 92 (1994). [Syllabus]
	NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORP.V. GARRIS [Syllabus] The general maritime cause of action recognized in Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 374, 409__for dealth caused by violation of maritime duties__is available for the negligent breach of a maritime dutry of care.
	EXXON CORP. V. CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC., 500 U.S. 603 (1991) [Syllabus]
	JEROME B. GRUBART, INC. V. GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO., 513 U.S. 527 (1995). [Syllabus]
	CALIFORNIA V. DEEP SEA RESEARCH, INC., 523 U.S. 491 (1998) [Syllabus]
	[Syllabus]
	CHANDRIS, INC. V. LATSIS, 515 U.S. 347 (1995). [Syllabus]
	HENDERSON V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 654 (1996). [Syllabus]
	EXXON CO., U. S. A., ET AL. V. SOFEC, INC., ET AL., 516 U.S. 1156 (1996). [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., 523 U.S. 360 (1998) [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. LOCKE [Syllabus] Whether regulations adopted by the State of Washington governing staffing and operation of oceangoing oil tankers engaged in coastal and international commerce are preempted to the extent that they conflict with international obligations of the United States and Coast Guard regulations for such tankers promulgated pursuant to federal statutes and international conventions and agreements.
	VIRGINIA V. MARYLAND [Syllabus]
	SINOCHEM INT L CO. V. MALAYSIA INT L SHIPPINGCORP. [Syllabus]
	SISSON V. RUBY, 497 U.S. 358 (1990) [Syllabus]
	YAMAHA MOTOR CORP., U. S. A., V. CALHOUN, 516 U.S. 199 (1996) [Syllabus]
	AMERICAN DREDGING V. MILLER, 510 U.S. 443 (1994). [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALASKA, 503 U.S. 569 (1992). [Syllabus]
	TENNESSEE STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION V. HOOD [Syllabus]
	LEWIS V. LEWIS & CLARK MARINE, INC. [Syllabus] 1. Does the district court abuse its discretion by dissolving the injuction against state court proceeding in a single claimant limitation of liability case (46 U.S.C. 181, et seq.) when the claimant guarantees the vessel owner's right to limitation by stipulating that the claim does not exceed the limitation fund; and 2. If so, must the injunction nonetheless be dissolved pursuant to the Saving To Suitors clause of 28 U.S.C. 1333(2)?"
	MILES V. APEX MARINE CORP.., 498 U.S. 19 (1990) [Syllabus]
	BUILDING & CONSTR. TRADES COUNCIL OF THE METRO. DIST. V. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS [Syllabus]
	DOOLEY V. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., 524 U.S. 116 (1998) [Syllabus]
	MCDERMOTT, INC. V. AMCLYDE, 511 U.S. 202 (1994) [Syllabus]
	CITY OF MILWAUKEE V. CEMENT DIV., NAT'L GYPSUM CO., 515 U.S. 189 (1995). [Syllabus]
	SARATOGA FISHING CO. V. J. M. MARTINAC & CO., 520 U.S. 875 (1997) [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, 511 U.S. 350 (1994). [Syllabus]
	DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEP'T OF LABOR V. NEWPORT [Syllabus]
	GEORGE V. SOUTH CAROLINA, 497 U.S. 396 (1990) [Syllabus]
	KANSAS V. HENDRICKS, 117 S.CT. 2072, 138 L.ED.2D 501 (1997). [Syllabus]
	ESTATE OF COWART V. NICKLOS DRILLING, 505 U.S. 469 (1992). [Syllabus]
	METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 515 U.S. 291 (1995). [Syllabus]
	LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS V.PERRY [Syllabus]
	BATH IRON WORKS V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 506 [Syllabus]
	NORFOLK SOUTHERN R. CO. V. JAMES N. KIRBY,PTY LTD. [Syllabus]
	FELTNER V. COLUMBIA PICTURES TELEVISION, INC., 523 U.S. 340 (1998) [Syllabus]
	LOUISIANA V. MISSISSIPPI, 516 U.S. 22 (1995) [Syllabus]
	MONTEREY V. DEL MONTE DUNES ATMONTEREY, LTD. [Syllabus]
	SHANNON V. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 573 (1994). [Syllabus]
	ALASKA V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
	INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC. V. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, 519 U.S. 248 (1997) [Syllabus]
	MERCK KGAA V. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD. [Syllabus]
	GENTILE V. STATE BAR OF NEVADA, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991) [Syllabus]
	UNITED STATES V. BALSYS, 524 U.S. 666 (1998) [Syllabus]
	DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DOL V. GREENWICH COLLIERIES, 512 U.S. 267 (1994) [Syllabus]
	METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBO, 117 S.CT. 1953, 138 L.ED.2D 327 (1997). [Syllabus]