skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query agriculture returned 10 results.

1000 ENGQUIST V. OREGON DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
[Syllabus]
1000 ENGQUIST V. OREGON DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
[Syllabus]
962 HILLSIDE DAIRY INC. V. LYONS
[Syllabus]
1. Whether section 144 of the 1996 Farm Bill creates an unmistakably clear blanket exemption to the dormant Commerce Clause For California's interstate regulation of the dairy industry, which would be otherwise limited by this Court's holding in baldwin v. G.A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), and its progeny? 2. Whether it is proper for courts to resort to legislative history or a paraphrase of a statute in order to discern an unmistakably clear Congressional exemption to the negative Commerce Clause?
916 GLICKMAN V. WILEMAN BROTHERS & ELLIOTT, INC., 117 S.CT. 2130, 138 L.ED.2D (1997)
[Syllabus]
866 JOHANNS V. LIVESTOCK MARKETING ASSN.
[Syllabus]
811
[Syllabus]
669 HOLLY FARMS CORP. ET AL. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. ET AL., 517 U.S. 392 (1996)
[Syllabus]
288 MONSANTO CO. V. GEERTSON SEED FARMS
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CAL.
[Syllabus]
288 UNITED STATES V. UNITED FOODS, INC.
[Syllabus]
The Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act's requirement that fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertising promoting mushroom sales violates the First Amendment.
288
[Syllabus]