Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Your query copyright returned 11 results.
![]() |
ELDRED V. ASHCROFT [Syllabus] The Copyright Term Extension Act, which enlarges the duration of existing and future copyrights by 20 years, does not exceed Congress' power under the Constitution's Copyright Clause and does not violate the First Amendment. |
![]() |
NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. TASINI [Syllabus] Where freelance authors' articles in print periodicals were republished in electronic databases without the authors' consent, the copying was not authorized by the reproduction privilege afforded collective works publishers under §201(c) of the Copyright Act. |
![]() |
FELTNER V. COLUMBIA PICTURES TELEVISION, INC., 523 U.S. 340 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. V.GROKSTER, LTD. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
REED ELSEVIER, INC. V. MUCHNICK [Syllabus] |
![]() |
QUALITY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. V. LANZA RESEARCH INT., 523 U.S. 135 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
DASTAR CORP. V. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOXFILM CORP. [Syllabus] 1. Does the Lanham Act protect creative works form uncredited copying, even without a likelihood of consumer confusion? 2. May a court applying the Lanham Act award twice the defendant's profits for purely deterrent purposes? |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
MICROSOFT CORP. V. AT&T CORP. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |










