Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
corporation

Search results

  1. AMERICAN MOTORS CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, formerly known as Nash-Kelvinator Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, and United States of America, Intervenor, appellants, v. CITY OF KENOSHA, a Municipal Corporation.

    356 U.S. 21 (78 S.Ct. 559, 2 L.Ed.2d 578) AMERICAN MOTORS CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation ... , formerly known as Nash-Kelvinator Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, and United States of America, ... Intervenor, appellants, v. CITY OF KENOSHA, a Municipal Corporation. No. 343. Decided: March 10, 1958 ...

  2. SLOAN SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al. v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION et al. ASTORIA MARINE IRON WORKS v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD...FLEET CORPORATION. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION v. WOOD.

    258 U.S. 549 (42 S.Ct. 386, 66 L.Ed. 762) SLOAN SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al. v. UNITED STATES ... SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION et al. ASTORIA MARINE IRON WORKS v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD ... EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION v. WOOD. Nos. 308, 376 ...

  3. ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a Body Corporate, and City of Chula Vista, a Municipal Corporation.

    362 U.S. 628 (80 S.Ct. 1050, 4 L.Ed.2d 1002) ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, a California Corporation ... , Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a Body Corporate, and City of Chula Vista, a Municipal Corporation. No. ... 765, but the record title to which is in the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, continues to be ...

  4. CTS CORPORATION, Appellant v. DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA. INDIANA, Appellant v. DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

    481 U.S. 69 (107 S.Ct. 1637, 95 L.Ed.2d 67) CTS CORPORATION, Appellant v. DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF ... AMERICA. INDIANA, Appellant v. DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA. No. 86-71, 86-97. Argued: March 2, 1987. ... STEVENS [HTML] Syllabus The federal Williams Act and implementing regulations govern hostile corporate ...

  5. CITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan Municipal Corporation, et al., appellants, v. The MURRAY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware Corporation, and the United States of America.

    357 U.S. 913 (78 S.Ct. 1145, 2 L.Ed.2d 1164) CITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan Municipal Corporation, et ... al., appellants, v. The MURRAY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware Corporation, and the United States of ... America. No. 18. Decided: NotFound CITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan Municipal Corporation, et al., petitioners, ...

  6. Betty LEVIN, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORPORATION et al. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORPORATION et al.

    CORPORATION et al. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORPORATION et al. ... Litigation. MoPac, a Missouri corporation, is an interstate common carrier railroad. It had been in ... 2 After those proceedings terminated, the corporation's preferred and common stock was replaced by ...

  7. UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION et al. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD MERCHANT FLEET CORPORATION v. BETHLEHEM SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, Limited.

    315 U.S. 289 (62 S.Ct. 581, 86 L.Ed. 855) UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION et al. ... UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD MERCHANT FLEET CORPORATION v. BETHLEHEM SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, Limited. ... a dispute between Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, Ltd., and the government about the amount of profits ...

  8. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MUSKEGON, a Municipal Corporation, et al. CONTINENTAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Etc., Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF MUSKEGON, a Municipal Corporation, et al.

    MUSKEGON, a Municipal Corporation, et al. CONTINENTAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Etc., Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF ... MUSKEGON, a Municipal Corporation, et al. Nos. 37, 38. Argued: Nov. 14, 1957. Decided: March 3, 1958. ... Michigan is unconstitutional as applied to a corporation using government property in connection with ...

  9. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, et al. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States, Petitioners v. BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, et al.

    503 U.S. 407 (112 S.Ct. 1394, 118 L.Ed.2d 52) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., ... Petitioners, v. BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, et al. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States, ... Petitioners v. BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, et al. Nos. 90-1419, 90-1769. Argued: Jan. 13, 1992. Decided: ...

  10. ALTOONA PUBLIX THEATRES, Inc., v. AMERICAN TRI-ERGON CORPORATION et al. WILMER & VINCENT CORPORATION et al. v. AMERICAN TRI-ERGON CORPORATION et al.

    CORPORATION et al.* WILMER & VINCENT CORPORATION et al. v. AMERICAN TRI-ERGON CORPORATION et al. Nos. 255, ... patent in suit. The Radio Corporation of America is defending both cases on behalf of its subsidiary, ... Corporation v. American Tri-Ergon Corporation, 294 U.S. 464, 55 S.Ct. 449, 79 L.Ed. 997, decided this day, and ...

Pages