skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query elections returned 44 results.

1000 NEW YORK STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS V.LOPEZ TORRES
[Syllabus]
1000 MCINTYRE V. OHIO ELECTIONS COMM'N, 514 U.S. 334 (1995).
[Syllabus]
1000 HARPER V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
[Dissent]
1000 HARPER V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
[Opinion]
1000 HARPER V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
[Syllabus]
1000 HARPER V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
[Dissent]
1000 MCCONNELL V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMíN
[Syllabus]
958 MCINTYRE V. OHIO ELECTIONS COMM'N, 514 U.S. 334 (1995).
[Syllabus]
934 COOK V. GRALIKE
[Syllabus]
1. Do the people violate Article V of the Constitution when they participate in the evolution of their government by communicating their opinion to federal legislators or by communicating on the ballot to voters about the behavior of federal candidates? 2. Do the people violate the Qualifications Clauses and the First Amendment when they comment on the ballot regarding an elected representative's actions and voting record or when they comment on the ballot about a non-incumbent congressional candidate's silence concerning a prospective constitutional amendment? 3. Does the speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution prohibit the people from commenting on the ballot about a federal legislator's actions and voting record in regard to a prospective constitutional amendment?"
885
[Syllabus]
858
[Syllabus]
826 NEW YORK STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS V.LOPEZ TORRES
[Syllabus]
716 BRANCH V. SMITH
[Syllabus]
The Federal District Court properly enjoined a Mississippi state court's proposed congressional redistricting plan and fashioned its own plan under 2 U. S. C. §2c.
671 RICE V. CAYETANO
[Syllabus]
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution permit the adoption of an explicitracial classification that restricts the right to vote in statewide elections for state officials.
671 YOUNG V. FORDICE, 520 U.S. 273 (1997).
[Syllabus]
671 RILEY V. KENNEDY
[Syllabus]
671 FOSTER V. LOVE, 522 U.S. 67 (1997)
[Syllabus]
619 LOPEZ V. MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 519 U.S. 9 (1996)
[Syllabus]
619
[Syllabus]
553 ARIZONA FREE ENTERPRISE CLUBS FREEDOMCLUB PAC V.BENNETT
[Syllabus]
553 U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC. V. THORNTON, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).
[Syllabus]
553 REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINN. V. WHITE
[Syllabus]
The Minnesota Supreme Court's canon of judicial conduct prohibiting candidates for judicial election from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues violates the First Amendment.
553 SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Whether petitioner's policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Establishment Clause."
553
[Syllabus]
553 LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS V.PERRY
[Syllabus]
477 CRAWFORD V. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BD.
[Syllabus]
477 MORSE V. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, 517 U.S. 186 (1996).
[Syllabus]
477
[Syllabus]
477 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMíN V. BEAUMONT
[Syllabus]
The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, 2 U.S.C. 441b, prohibits corporations and labor unions from making direct campaign contributions and independent expenditures in connection with federal elections. The question presented is whether Section 441b's prohibition on contributions violates the First Amendment to the Constitution if it is applied to a nonprofit corporation whose primary purpose is to engage in political advocacy.
377 CAPERTON V. A.†T. MASSEY COAL CO.
[Syllabus]
377 BARTLETT V. STRICKLAND
[Syllabus]
377 CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMN
[Syllabus]
377 BUCKLEY V. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
[Syllabus]
377
[Syllabus]
377 NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTIL. DIST.NOV.HOLDER
[Syllabus]
238 RANDALL V. SORRELL
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238 BURDICK V. TAKUSHI, 504 U.S. 428 (1992)
[Syllabus]
238 TIMMONS V. TWIN CITIES AREA NEW PARTY, 520 U.S. 351 (1997)
[Syllabus]
238 ABRAMS V. JOHNSON, 117 S.CT. 1925, 138 L.ED.2D 285 (1997).
[Syllabus]
238 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMíN V. COLORADOREPUBLICAN FEDERAL CAMPAIGN COMM.
[Syllabus]
Because a political party's expenditures coordinated with its candidates, unlike the party's truly independent expenditures, may be restricted to minimize circumvention of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971's contribution limits, the Colorado Republican Party's facial challenge to the Acts limits on parties' coordinated expenditures is rejected.
238 CLINGMAN V. BEAVER
[Syllabus]
238 44 LIQUORMART, INC., ET AL. V. RHODE ISLAND ET AL., 517 U.S. 484 (1996).
[Syllabus]
238 HUNT V. CROMARTIE
[Syllabus]
238 WATCHTOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOC. OF N. Y., INC. V.VILLAGE OF STRATTON
[Syllabus]
A village ordinance making it a misdemeanor to engage in door-to-door advocacy without first registering with the mayor and receiving a permit violates the First Amendment as it applies to religious proselytizing, anonymous political speech, and the distribution of handbills.
238 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF UNITED STATESV. BROWN
[Syllabus]
238 RENO V. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, 520 U.S. 471 (1997).
[Syllabus]
238 ALLENTOWN MACK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. V. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359 (1998)
[Syllabus]
238 M. L. B. V. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
[Syllabus]
238 GUTIERREZ V. ADA
[Syllabus]
1. By rewriting the statutory words "" in any election"" to state"" in any general election in which the gubernational election is a part,"" 2. By rewriting the statutory words a "" majority of votes cast in any election"" to mean a ""majority of votes cast in any election"" to mean a ""majority of ballots cast in any general election,"" and 3. By counting as ""votes"" ballots that are invalid under Guam election statutes, thereby placing the Ninth Circuit in direct conflict with the Third Circuit's interpretation of the identical language of the Virgin Islands Organic Act (48 U.S.C. 1591) in Todman v. Boschulte, 684 F.2D (3d Cir. 1982)?