skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query energy returned 28 results.

1000 POWEREX CORP. V. RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
1000 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE V. DUKE ENERGY CORP.
[Syllabus]
1000 LEVIN V. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
[Syllabus]
1000
[Syllabus]
958 NEW YORK V. FERC
[Syllabus]
FERC did not exceed its jurisdiction when it required electric utilities that "unbundle"-i.e., separate-transmission costs from electricity costs when billing their retail consumers to transmit competitors' electricity over their lines on the same terms that the utilities apply to their own transmissions; and FERC's decision not to impose that requirement on utilities that offer only "bundled" retail sales was a permissible policy choice.
858 POWEREX CORP. V. RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
858 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE V. DUKE ENERGY CORP.
[Syllabus]
826 LEVIN V. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
[Syllabus]
716 SOUTH CAROLINA V. NORTH CAROLINA
[Syllabus]
553 NRG POWER MARKETING, LLC V. MAINE PUB.UTIL. COMMN
[Syllabus]
553 AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
553 BILSKI V. KAPPOS
[Syllabus]
477 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. DOE, 519 U.S. 425 (1997).
[Syllabus]
377 MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC. V. PUBLICUTIL. DIST. NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH CTY.
[Syllabus]
377 ENTERGY LA., INC. V. LOUISIANA PUB. SERV. COMMN
[Syllabus]
Whether Mississippi Power & light v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore, 487 U.S. 354 (1988), and Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg, 476 U.S. 953 (1986), require a state public utility commission to allow an electric utility member of a multi-state power system to recover, in retail rates, the costs allocated to it by a rate schedule of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), or whether the state commission has jurisdiction to decide that it was imprudent for such a utility to incur the costs allocated to it under a FERC rate schedule, thereby trapping such wholesale costs?
377 CHENEY V. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT FOR D. C.
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 1, §§ 1 et seq., can be construed, consistent with the Constitution, principles of separation of powers, and this Court's decisions governing judicial review of Executive Branch actions, to authorize broad discovery of the process by which the Vice President and other senior advisors gathered information to advise the President on important national policy matters, based solely on an unsupported allegation in a complaint that the advisory group was not constituted as the President expressly directed and the advisory group itself reported? (2) Whether the court of appeals had mandamus or appellate jurisdiction to review the district court's unprecedented discovery orders in this litigation?
238 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION V. PUBLICCITIZEN
[Syllabus]
Whether a presidential foreign-affairs action that is otherwise exempt from environmental-review requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., and Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7506(c)(1), became subject to those requirements because an executive agency promulgated administrative rules concerning implementation of the President's action?
238 UNITED STATES V. EURODIF S.A.
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238 GRANHOLM V. HEALD
[Syllabus]
238 ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH V. ARIZONA, 520 U.S. 43 (1997).
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238 MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCINGSOUTHEAST, INC. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding-contrary to decisions of this Court, other courts of appeals, and state courts, as well as the Restatements and leading treatises-that petitioner could not receive restitution of the $78 million paid to the United States for oil and gas leases following the enactment of a statute, which the trial court found ""clearly reduce(d) the value and materially alter(ed) the structure and framework"" of those leases, because (1) petitioner had not proved that this material breach of its leases caused it any injury and (2) Congress repealed the statute after petitioner filed suit asserting material breach?"
238
[Syllabus]
238 ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION V. EPA
[Syllabus]
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in upholding the EPA's assertion of authority to second-guess a permitting decision made by the State of Alaska--which had been delegated permitting authority under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.--in conflict with decisions of this Court and other federal courts of appeals establishing the division of federal-state jurisdiction under the Act and similar statutory programs.
238 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KY. V. DAVIS
[Syllabus]
238 BOGAN V. SCOTT-HARRIS, 523 U.S. 44 (1998)
[Syllabus]
238 MASSACHUSETTS V. EPA
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]