1. Home › Search › Site › environment or (resource and conservation) or EPA › supct_node

Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
imprisonment or (resources and observation) or epa

Search results

  1. MASSACHUSETTS v. EPA

    on human health and the environment. Id., at 22–35. As to EPA’s statutory ... Syllabus MASSACHUSETTS v. EPA (No. 05-1120) 415 F. 3d 50, reversed and remanded. Syllabus [HTML] ... organizations petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to begin regulating the emissions of four ...

  2. CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Petitioner, v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al.

    Petitioners, v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ... Petitioner, v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al. Nos. 83-1013, 83-1373. Argued: Nov. 6, 1984. ... (EPA) is required to promulgate regulations establishing categories of pollution sources and setting ...

  3. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    surprisingly, EPA acknowledges that PSD review is a “complicated, resource-intensive, time-consuming, and ... e.g., Sierra Club v. EPA, 499 F. 3d 653, 654–655 (CA7 2007); In re Pennsauken Cty., N. J., Resource ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ...

  4. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    surprisingly, EPA acknowledges that PSD review is a “complicated, resource-intensive, time-consuming, and ... e.g., Sierra Club v. EPA, 499 F. 3d 653, 654–655 (CA7 2007); In re Pennsauken Cty., N. J., Resource ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ...

  5. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    surprisingly, EPA acknowledges that PSD review is a “complicated, resource-intensive, time-consuming, and ... e.g., Sierra Club v. EPA, 499 F. 3d 653, 654–655 (CA7 2007); In re Pennsauken Cty., N. J., Resource ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ...

  6. ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION v. EPA

    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRON- MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al. on writ of ... Alaska’s Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). The question presented is what role EPA has with ... Syllabus ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION v.EPA (No. 02-658) 298 F. 3d 814, affirmed. ...

  7. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Petitioners v. STATE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION et al.

    Petitioners v. STATE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION et al. No. 81-1945. Argued: ... powerplant may be built, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission must determine on ... findings by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission that adequate storage ...

  8. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

    (1983). 3. National Resources Defense Council, Inc., Citizens for a Better Environment, Inc., and North ... 467 U.S. 837 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (No. 82-1005) Argued: ... standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pursuant to earlier legislation, ...

  9. STEEL CO. v. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRONMENT

    Syllabus STEEL CO. v. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRONMENT (No. 96-643) 90 F. 3d 1237, vacated and ... CO., aka CHICAGO STEEL & PICKLING CO. v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT certiorari to the united ... COMPANY, PETITIONER v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT on writ of certiorari to the united states court ...

  10. John O. MARSH, Jr., Secretary of the Army, et al., Petitioners, v. OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL et al.

    Petitioners, v. OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL et al. No. 87-1704. Argued: Jan. 9, 1989. Decided: May 1, ... the second is a United States Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil survey containing information that ... environment in a significant manner or to a significant extent not already considered. Although not expressly ...

Pages