Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL CRUSHED STONE ASSOCIATION et al. Douglas COSTLE, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. et al.

    the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), acting under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Act), ... Council on Environmental Quality, Dept. of Commerce, & EPA, The Economic Impact of Pollution Control ... 449 U.S. 64 (101 S.Ct. 295, 66 L.Ed.2d 268) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Petitioner, v. ...

  2. DUKE POWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, INC., et al. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION et al., Appellants, v. CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, INC., et al.

    ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, INC., et al. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION et al., Appellants, v. ... CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP, INC., et al. Nos. 77-262, 77-375. Argued: March 20, 1978. Decided: June ... Commission (NRC), were sued by appellees (an environmental organization, a labor union, and a number of ...

  3. STEEL CO. v. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRONMENT

    fronts. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the most powerful enforcement arsenal: it may seek ... Syllabus STEEL CO. v. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRONMENT (No. 96-643) 90 F. 3d 1237, vacated and ... CO., aka CHICAGO STEEL & PICKLING CO. v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT certiorari to the united ...

  4. MASSACHUSETTS v. EPA

    organizations petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to begin regulating the emissions of four ... prompt EPA to take steps to reduce that risk, Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., ... efficiency by setting mileage standards may overlap with EPA’s environmental responsibilities in no ...

  5. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    environmental, and economic impacts and other costs.” Ibid. Some petitioners urge us to hold that EPA may never ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ... STATES Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al. certiorari to the ...

  6. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    environmental, and economic impacts and other costs.” Ibid. Some petitioners urge us to hold that EPA may never ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ... STATES Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al. certiorari to the ...

  7. UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA

    environmental, and economic impacts and other costs.” Ibid. Some petitioners urge us to hold that EPA may never ... Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. EPA () 684 F. 3d 102, affirmed in part and reversed in ... STATES Syllabus UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al. certiorari to the ...

  8. MICHIGAN v. EPA

    environment. . . warranting regulation.” §7412(c)(3). In stark contrast, Congress instructed EPA to add power ... (emphasis added). For example: EPA considered environmental effects relevant to the ... concerned with environmental effects.” 76 Fed. Reg. 24987. EPA considered availability of controls relevant ...

  9. MICHIGAN v. EPA

    environment. . . warranting regulation.” §7412(c)(3). In stark contrast, Congress instructed EPA to add power ... (emphasis added). For example: EPA considered environmental effects relevant to the ... concerned with environmental effects.” 76 Fed. Reg. 24987. EPA considered availability of controls relevant ...

  10. MICHIGAN v. EPA

    environment. . . warranting regulation.” §7412(c)(3). In stark contrast, Congress instructed EPA to add power ... (emphasis added). For example: EPA considered environmental effects relevant to the ... concerned with environmental effects.” 76 Fed. Reg. 24987. EPA considered availability of controls relevant ...

Pages