skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query firearms returned 36 results.

1000 UNITED STATES V. URSERY, 518 U.S. 267 (1996).
[Syllabus]
1000 CARON V. UNITED STATES, 524 U.S. 308 (1998)
[Syllabus]
1000 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
[Syllabus]
824 UNITED STATES V. BEAN
[Syllabus]
The absence of an actual denial by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms of a felon's petition for relief from firearms disabilities precludes judicial review under 18 U. S. C. §925(c).
824 MUSCARELLO V. UNITED STATES, 524 U.S. 125 (1998)
[Syllabus]
824 UNITED STATES V. GONZALES, 520 U.S. 1 (1997).
[Syllabus]
824 PRINTZ V. UNITED STATES, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)
[Syllabus]
711 LOPEZ V. DAVIS
[Syllabus]
Whether the director of the Bureau of Prisons has the authority to categorically deny consideration for eligibility for early release as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. 3621(e) (2) (B) to an inmate convicted of a nonviolent offense after the inmate has completed the requisite residential substance abuse program.
711 UNITED STATES V. HAYES
[Syllabus]
711 BRYAN V. UNITED STATES, 524 U.S 184 (1998)
[Syllabus]
561 LOGAN V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
561 DIXON V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
561 BOUSLEY V. UNITED STATES, 523 U.S. 614 (1998)
[Syllabus]
561 UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
[Syllabus]
561
[Syllabus]
355 PENNSYLVANIA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE V. SCOTT, 524 U.S. 357 (1998)
[Syllabus]
355
[Syllabus]
355 APPRENDI V. NEW JERSEY
[Syllabus]
Whether this Court should decline the invitation of the New Jersey Supreme Court to decide whether New Jersey's hate crime law, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-3e., unconstitutionally provides for an extended term of imprisonment increasing the maximum possible penalty by ten years, based on proof by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and denies the defendant rights to notice by indictment and trial by jury."
355 UNITED STATES V. RAMIREZ, 523 U.S. 65 (1998)
[Syllabus]
355 SMITH V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Because Alaska's "Megan's Law" is nonpunitive, its retroactive application does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause.
355
[Syllabus]
355 CHANDLER V. MILLER, 520 U.S. 305 (1997)
[Syllabus]
355 UNITED STATES V. JOHNSON
[Syllabus]
Whether a federal criminal defendant's term of supervised release commences on the date of his actual release from prison or on the earlier date on which he should have been released in accordance with a retroactively applied change in the law.
355 ABBOTT V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
355 RUBIN V. COORS BREWING CO., 514 U.S. 476 (1995).
[Syllabus]
355 MILNER V. DEPARTMENT OF NAVY
[Syllabus]
355 GROH V. RAMIREZ
[Syllabus]
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit properly ruled that a law enforcement officer violated clearly established law, and thus was personally liable in damages and not entitled to qualified immunity, when at the time he acted there was no decision by the Supreme Court or any other court so holding, and the only lower court decisions addressing the issue had found the same conduct did not violate the law?
355 WATSON V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
355 ALABAMA V. BOZEMAN
[Syllabus]
The literal language of Art. IV(e) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers-which provides that a State that obtains a prisoner for trial must try him within 120 days of his arrival, Art. IV(c), and if it returns him to his original place of imprisonment prior to that trial, charges "shall" be dismissed with prejudice, Art. IV(e)-bars further criminal proceedings when a defendant is returned to the original place of imprisonment before trial.
355 THORNTON V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), which established a bright-line rule authorizing a search of a car's passenger compartment incident to a contemporaneous lawful arrest of an occupant therein, also authorizes a warrantless search of a car when the arrestee was not in the car when the police initiated contact with him or within reaching distance of the car at the time of the arrest?
355 CASTILLO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
18 U.S.C. 924©(1) punishes with five years imprisonment whoever, during a federal crime of violence, ""uses or carries a firearm, . . . and if the firearm is a machinegun, or a destructive device, ""with thirty years. The issues are (1) whether the firearm type is an element of the offense which must be alleged in the indictment and found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, or is a sentencing factor to be found by the judge by a preponderance of evidence, and (2) whether equivocal ""legislative history"" overrides the doctrine of constitutional doubt set forth in Jones V. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999), that a statute must be interpreted to avoid possible unconstitutionality under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments."
355 BEGAY V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
355 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES V. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 526 U.S. 86 (1999)
[Syllabus]
355 GREENLAW V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
355 SMALL V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
355
[Syllabus]