skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query immigration returned 37 results.

1000 JAMA V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
[Syllabus]
1000 IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERV. V. YUEH SHAIO YANG, 519 U.S. 26 (1996)
[Syllabus]
1000 IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERV. V. YUEH SHAIO YANG, 519 U.S. 26 (1996)
[Syllabus]
946 JAMA V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
[Syllabus]
926 INS V. ST. CYR
[Syllabus]
Amendments that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 made to the Immigration and Nationality Act did not affect the federal courts' habeas jurisdiction to decide pure questions of law; nor did they affect the availability of discretionary relief from deportation for aliens whose convictions were obtained through plea agreements before the amendments' effective dates.
856 INS V. AGUIRRE-AGUIRRE
[Syllabus]
856 NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK, 523 U.S. 767 (1998)
[Syllabus]
799 TUAN ANH NGUYEN V. INS
[Syllabus]
Title 8 U. S. C. ยง1409, which provides different citizenship rules for children born abroad and out of wedlock to one United States citizen and one noncitizen depending on whether the citizen parent is the mother or the father, is consistent with the equal protection guarantee embedded in the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
799 DEMORE V. KIM
[Syllabus]
Whether respodent's mandatory detention under Section 1226 ( c) violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, where respondent was convicted of an aggravated felony after his admission into the United States.
799 HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB
[Syllabus]
Federal immigration policy, as expressed in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, foreclosed the National Labor Relations Board from awarding backpay to an undocumented alien who was never legally authorized to work in the United States.
769
[Syllabus]
769 CALCANO-MARTINEZ V. INS
[Syllabus]
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 precludes courts of appeals from exercising jurisdiction to review a final removal order against aliens removable by reason of aggravated felony convictions, but such aliens may pursue habeas relief in the district court.
769 CARACHURI-ROSENDO V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
732 STONE V. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995).
[Syllabus]
732
[Syllabus]
692 KUCANA V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
692 CLARK V. MARTINEZ
[Syllabus]
598 NIJHAWAN V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
598 LOPEZ V. GONZALES
[Syllabus]
598 ZADVYDAS V. DAVIS
[Syllabus]
The post-removal-period detention statute, read in light of the Constitution's demands, implicitly limits an alien's detention to a period reasonably necessary to bring about that alien's removal from the United States, and does not permit indefinite detention; the application of that limitation is subject to federal court review.
598
[Syllabus]
535 LEOCAL V. ASHCROFT
[Syllabus]
535 DADA V. MUKASEY
[Syllabus]
461 NEGUSIE V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
461 MUEHLER V. MENA
[Syllabus]
461 FERNANDEZ-VARGAS V. GONZALES
[Syllabus]
461 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF UNITED STATES OFAMERICA V. WHITING
[Syllabus]
461 PADILLA V. KENTUCKY
[Syllabus]
364
[Syllabus]
364 RENO V. AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATIONCOMM.
[Syllabus]
364 NKEN V. HOLDER
[Syllabus]
364 GONZALES V. DUENAS-ALVAREZ
[Syllabus]
364 SHALALA V. ILLINOIS COUNCIL ON LONGTERM CARE, INC.
[Syllabus]
Whether 42 U.S.C. 405H(h), incorporated into the Medicare Act by 42 U.S.C. 1395ii, permits skilled nursing facilities participating in the Medicare program to obtain judicial review under 28 U.S.C.1331 and 1346 (1994 & Supp. II 1996) to challenge the validity of Medicare regulations.
230 FLORES-FIGUEROA V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
230 KIMBROUGH V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
230 BOND V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
1. Whether a search occurs when a law enforcement officer manipulates a bus passenger's personal carry-on luggage to determine its contents."
230 HUI V. CASTANEDA
[Syllabus]
230 UNITED STATES V. RUIZ
[Syllabus]
The Fifth and Sixth Amendments do not require the Government to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement with a criminal defendant.
230 UNITED STATES V. BALSYS, 524 U.S. 666 (1998)
[Syllabus]