skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query judiciary returned 45 results.

1000 CITY OF BOERNE V. FLORES, 117 S.CT. 2157, 138 L.ED.2D 624 (1997).
[Syllabus]
789 KIRCHER V. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST
[Syllabus]
789 PEGRAM V. HERDRICH
[Syllabus]
Whether a health maintenance organization (""HMO"") and its physicians breach a fiduciary duty under section 404(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1404(a)(1), by implementing a managed care program in which the physicians receive financial incentives to provide medical care to the HMO's enrollees in a cost-effective manner.
789 MILLER V. FRENCH
[Syllabus]
The question presented is whether Section 3626(e) violates separation-of-powers principles by legislatively specifying a rule of decision or legislatively annulling a judgment."
789 CLINTON V. JONES, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)
[Syllabus]
789
[Syllabus]
789 ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION V.WINN
[Syllabus]
789 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION V. VELAZQUEZ
[Syllabus]
Whether the court of appeals erred in refusing to follow this Court's decision in Rust V. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1990) when it invalidated a limitation imposed by congress on the services that may be provided by legal Services Corporation grantees and held that Congress must subsidize grantees involved in litigation that seeks to amend or otherwise challenges existing welfare laws."
789 MUNAF V.GEREN
[Syllabus]
499 DOOLEY V. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., 524 U.S. 116 (1998)
[Syllabus]
499 CARR V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
499 GRUPO MEXICANO DE DESARROLLO, S. A. V. ALLIANCE BOND FUND, INC.
[Syllabus]
499 STERN V. MARSHALL
[Syllabus]
499 JEFFERSON V. CITY OF TARRANT, ALA., 522 U.S. 75 (1997)
[Syllabus]
499 BOUMEDIENE V. BUSH
[Syllabus]
499 UNITED HAULERS ASSN., INC. V. ONEIDA-HERKIMERSOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
[Syllabus]
499 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. V. FLOR-IDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
[Syllabus]
499 GEISSAL V. MOORE MEDICAL CORP., 524 U.S. 74 (1998)
[Syllabus]
499 REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINN. V. WHITE
[Syllabus]
The Minnesota Supreme Court's canon of judicial conduct prohibiting candidates for judicial election from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues violates the First Amendment.
499 HALBERT V. MICHIGAN
[Syllabus]
499 RILEY V. KENNEDY
[Syllabus]
499 DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THIRD JUDICIALDIST. V. OSBORNE
[Syllabus]
499
[Syllabus]
499 ALDEN V. MAINE
[Syllabus]
499 F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD. V. EMPAGRAN S.A.
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (FTAIA), 15 U.S.C. § 6a, the Sherman Act applies to claims of foreign plaintiffs whose injuries do not arise from the effects of antitrust violations on United States commerce? (2) Whether such foreign plaintiffs lack antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15(a)?
499 BOULWARE V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
499 GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES, INC. V. SEB S.A.
[Syllabus]
499 BLESSING V. FREESTONE, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
[Syllabus]
499 PLAUT V. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., 514 U.S. 211 (1995).
[Syllabus]
499 ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. V. NEWDOW
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether Michael Newdow has standing to challenge as unconstitutional a public school district policy that requires teachers to lead willing students in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance? (2) Whether a public school district policy that requires teachers to lead willing students in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, which includes the words "under God," violates the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment, as applicable through the 14th Amendment?
499
[Syllabus]
499 BE&K CONSTR. CO. V. NLRB
[Syllabus]
Respondent National Labor Relations Board lacked authority to find that petitioner violated federal labor law by prosecuting against respondent unions an unsuccessful lawsuit with a retaliatory motive.
499 ARKANSAS V. FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, 520 U.S. 821 (1997)
[Syllabus]
499 UNITED STATES V. BALSYS, 524 U.S. 666 (1998)
[Syllabus]
499
[Syllabus]
499 REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA V. ALTMANN
[Syllabus]
Does the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) confer jurisdiction in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California over the Republic of Austria and the state-owned Austrian Gallery in a suit alleging wrongful appropriation of six Gustav Klimt paintings from their rightful heirs?
499 STONE V. INS, 514 U.S. 386 (1995).
[Syllabus]
499
[Syllabus]
499 JEFFERSON COUNTY V. ACKER
[Syllabus]
499 MICROSOFT CORP. V. AT&T CORP.
[Syllabus]
499
[Syllabus]
499
[Syllabus]
499 CHENEY V. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT FOR D. C.
[Syllabus]
(1) Whether the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 1, §§ 1 et seq., can be construed, consistent with the Constitution, principles of separation of powers, and this Court's decisions governing judicial review of Executive Branch actions, to authorize broad discovery of the process by which the Vice President and other senior advisors gathered information to advise the President on important national policy matters, based solely on an unsupported allegation in a complaint that the advisory group was not constituted as the President expressly directed and the advisory group itself reported? (2) Whether the court of appeals had mandamus or appellate jurisdiction to review the district court's unprecedented discovery orders in this litigation?
499
[Syllabus]
499 RAYMOND B. YATES, M.D., P.C. PROFIT SHARINGPLAN V. HENDON
[Syllabus]
Whether the working owner of a business (here, the sole shareholder of a corporate employer) is precluded from being a "participant" under Section 3(7) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1002(7), in an ERISA plan?