skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query media returned 28 results.

1000 COHEN V. COWLES MEDIA CO.
[Syllabus]
1000 COHEN V. COWLES MEDIA CO.
[Dissent]
1000 COHEN V. COWLES MEDIA CO.
[Opinion]
1000 COHEN V. COWLES MEDIA CO.
[Dissent]
1000
[Syllabus]
830 WILSON V. LAYNE
[Syllabus]
790 CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMN
[Syllabus]
700
[Syllabus]
700 SKILLING V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
498 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT V. DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, 519 U.S. 316 (1997)
[Syllabus]
498 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. V. UNITED STATESEX REL. KIRK
[Syllabus]
393 UNITED STATES V. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENTGROUP, INC.
[Syllabus]
1. Whether Section 505 violates the First Amendment. 2. Whether the three-judge district court was divested of jurisdiction to dispose of the government's post- judgment motions under Rule 59 (e) and 60 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the government's filing of a notice of appeal while those motion were pending.
393 BROWN V. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS ASSN.
[Syllabus]
393 MCCONNELL V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMíN
[Syllabus]
393 DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC,., ET AL. V. F.C.C., 518 U.S. 727 (1996)
[Syllabus]
249 RENO V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, 117 S.CT. 2329, 138 L.ED.2D 874 (1997)
[Syllabus]
249 METRO BROADCASTING, INC. V. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990)
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 MILKOVICH V. LORAIN JOURNAL CO., 497 U.S. 1 (1990)
[Syllabus]
249 BARTNICKI V. VOPPER
[Syllabus]
Respondent news media's disclosure of the contents of an illegally intercepted cell phone conversation about a public issue is protected by the First Amendment.
249 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMíN V. COLORADOREPUBLICAN FEDERAL CAMPAIGN COMM.
[Syllabus]
Because a political party's expenditures coordinated with its candidates, unlike the party's truly independent expenditures, may be restricted to minimize circumvention of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971's contribution limits, the Colorado Republican Party's facial challenge to the Acts limits on parties' coordinated expenditures is rejected.
249 BUSH V. VERA, 517 U.S. 952 (1996).
[Syllabus]
249 MICROSOFT CORP. V. AT&T CORP.
[Syllabus]
249 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOC. CHAPTER OF UNIV. OF CAL.,HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW V. MARTINEZ
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249 NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. TASINI
[Syllabus]
Where freelance authors' articles in print periodicals were republished in electronic databases without the authors' consent, the copying was not authorized by the reproduction privilege afforded collective works publishers under §201(c) of the Copyright Act.
249
[Syllabus]
249 GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATIONDIST. V.UNITED STATES EX REL. WILSON
[Syllabus]
249 MITCHELL V. HELMS
[Syllabus]
Whether a program under Chapter 2 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 7301, et seq., which provides federal funds to state and local education agencies to purchase and lend neutral, secular, and nonreligious materials such as computers, software, and library books to public and nonpublic schools for use by the students attending those schools, and which allocates the funds on an equal per-student basis, regardless of the religious or secular character of the schools the students choose to attend, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]
249
[Syllabus]