Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Did you mean multiplier?
Your query multiemployer returned 10 results.
![]() |
BECK V. PACE INTL UNION [Syllabus] |
![]() |
MILWAUKEE BREWERY WORKERS' PENSION PLAN V. JOS. SCHLITZ BREWING CO., 513 U.S. 414 (1995) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
BAY AREA LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING PENSION TRUST FUND V. FERBAR CORP. OF CALIFORNIA, 522 U.S. 192 (1997) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
EASTERN ENTERPRISES V. APFEL, 524 U.S. 498 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
HARDT V. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS. CO. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
BARNHART V. SIGMON COAL CO. [Syllabus] The Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 does not permit the Commissioner of Social Security to assign retired miners to the successors in interest of out-of-business coal operators that signed agreements requiring contributions to the 1950 or 1974 Benefits Plans for miners. |
![]() |
14 PENN PLAZA LLC V. PYETT [Syllabus] |
![]() |
BROWN V. PRO FOOTBALL, INC.., 518 U.S. 231 (1996) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
CENTRAL LABORERS’ PENSION FUND V. HEINZ [Syllabus] Whether an amendment to a multiemployer pension plan that provides for the suspension of the payment of early retirement benefits during the period that a participant, after retiring, is employed by another firm in the same industry is a prohibited elimination or reduction of such benefits under the "anti-cutback" rule in Section 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1054(g), when applied to employees who retired prior to adoption of the amendment. |







