Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"
Find lawyers in the LII Lawyer Directory
Did you mean NLRB?
Your query nlrb returned 34 results.
![]() |
NLRB V. KENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE, INC. [Syllabus] The burden of proving supervisory status in a representation hearing and unfair-labor-practice proceeding falls on the employer, the party asserting supervisory status; the NLRB's categorical exclusion of professional judgments from the term "independent judgment" is inconsistent with the National Labor Relations Act. |
![]() |
ALLENTOWN MACK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. V. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P. V. NLRB [Syllabus] |
![]() |
HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB [Syllabus] Federal immigration policy, as expressed in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, foreclosed the National Labor Relations Board from awarding backpay to an undocumented alien who was never legally authorized to work in the United States. |
![]() |
BE&K CONSTR. CO. V. NLRB [Syllabus] Respondent National Labor Relations Board lacked authority to find that petitioner violated federal labor law by prosecuting against respondent unions an unsuccessful lawsuit with a retaliatory motive. |
![]() |
HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB [Syllabus] Federal immigration policy, as expressed in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, foreclosed the National Labor Relations Board from awarding backpay to an undocumented alien who was never legally authorized to work in the United States. |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
BE&K CONSTR. CO. V. NLRB [Syllabus] Respondent National Labor Relations Board lacked authority to find that petitioner violated federal labor law by prosecuting against respondent unions an unsuccessful lawsuit with a retaliatory motive. |
![]() |
NLRB V. KENTUCKY RIVER COMMUNITY CARE, INC. [Syllabus] The burden of proving supervisory status in a representation hearing and unfair-labor-practice proceeding falls on the employer, the party asserting supervisory status; the NLRB's categorical exclusion of professional judgments from the term "independent judgment" is inconsistent with the National Labor Relations Act. |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
NEW PROCESS STEEL, L. P. V. NLRB [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
ALLENTOWN MACK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. V. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
MARQUEZ V. SCREEN ACTORS [Syllabus] |
![]() |
AUCIELLO IRON WORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD., 517 U.S. 781 (1996) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF UNITED STATESV. BROWN [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
14 PENN PLAZA LLC V. PYETT [Syllabus] |
![]() |
GRANITE ROCK CO. V. TEAMSTERS [Syllabus] |
![]() |
HOLLY FARMS CORP. ET AL. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. ET AL., 517 U.S. 392 (1996) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
WEST V. GIBSON [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. V. GLENN [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
KASTEN V. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
N.L.R.B. V. TOWN & COUNTRY ELEC, INC., ET, 516 U.S. 85 (1995) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR V. KLAMATHWATER USERS PROTECTIVE ASSN. [Syllabus] Documents passing between Indian Tribes and the Interior Department addressing tribal interests subject to state and federal water-allocation proceedings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act as "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters" under FOIA Exemption 5. |
![]() |
HOUSEHOLD CREDIT SERVICES, INC. V. PFENNIG [Syllabus] Whether the Federal Reserve Board reasonably classified a fee imposed by a credit card lender because a consumer has exceeded the credit limit as one of the "other charges which may be imposed" under the account [15 U.S.C. 1637(a)(5)] rather than as a "finance charge" [15 U.S.C. 1605(a)], within the meaning of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq? |
![]() |
REGIONS HOSPITAL V. SHALALA, 522 U.S. 448 (1998) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
ARKANSAS V. FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, 520 U.S. 821 (1997) [Syllabus] |
![]() |
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE V. SUDERS [Syllabus] When a hostile work environment created by a supervisor culminates in a constructive discharge, may the employer assert an affirmative defense? |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
WRIGHT V. UNIVERSAL MARITIME SERVICE CORP. [Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |
![]() |
[Syllabus] |











