skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query property returned 240 results.

Your search has returned a large number of results. You might want to consider using additional terms to narrow it.

1000 LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. V. ROCHE
[Syllabus]
1000 UNITED STATES V. CRAFT
[Syllabus]
Michigan law gives a tenant by the entirety individual rights in the estate sufficient to constitute "property" or "rights to property" to which a federal tax lien may attach under 26 U. S. C. §6321.
977
[Syllabus]
953 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC. V. FLOR-IDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
[Syllabus]
936 DRYE V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether the interest of an heir in an estate constitutes 'property ' or a 'right to property' to which the federal tax lien attaches under 26 U.S.C 6321 even though the heir thereafter purports retroactively to disclaim the interest under state law.
895
[Syllabus]
884 PALAZZOLO V. RHODE ISLAND
[Syllabus]
Petitioner's claim that Rhode Island's application of its wetlands regulations took his property without compensation in violation of the Takings Clause is ripe for review and is not barred by his acquisition of title after the regulations' effective date; however, he failed to establish a deprivation of all economic use, for the parcel retains significant development value.
862 SCHWAB V. REILLY
[Syllabus]
851 POLAR TANKERS, INC. V. CITY OF VALDEZ
[Syllabus]
851 CLEVELAND V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
1. Can alleged false statements or omissions in applications for state licenses be the basis for federal mail or wire fraud charges, on the theory that a license that has not yet been issued constitutes ""property"" of the State, of which the State is deprived when it issues the license? 2. Is materiality an element of the offense of mail fraud?"
809 LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. V. ROCHE
[Syllabus]
796 LINGLE V. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
[Syllabus]
796
[Syllabus]
779 CSX TRANSP., INC. V. GEORGIA STATE BD. OFEQUALIZATION
[Syllabus]
743 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. V. ALABAMA DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
743 PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO UNITED NATIONS V.CITY OF NEW YORK
[Syllabus]
724 PHILLIPS V. WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, 524 U.S. 156 (1998)
[Syllabus]
724 BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST AND SAV. ASSN. V.203 NORTH LASALLE STREET PARTNERSHIP
[Syllabus]
724
[Syllabus]
705
[Syllabus]
705 SCHEIDLER V. NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FORWOMEN, INC.
[Syllabus]
Because all of the predicate acts supporting the jury's finding of a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act must be reversed, the Seventh Circuit's decision that petitioner protesters' activities at abortion clinics violated RICO must also be reversed.
683 WILKIE V. ROBBINS
[Syllabus]
683 UNITED STATES V. WHITE MOUNTAINAPACHE TRIBE
[Syllabus]
Public Law 86-392 gives rise to Indian Tucker Act jurisdiction in the Court of Federal Claims over respondent Tribe's suit for money damages against the United States for breach of a fiduciary duty to manage Fort Apache land and improvements held in trust for the Tribe but occupied by the Government.
683 TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC. V.TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
[Syllabus]
Two moratoria on development that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency imposed while formulating a comprehensive land-use plan for the Lake Tahoe Basin did not constitute per se takings of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause.
658
[Syllabus]
658 KOONS BUICK PONTIAC GMC, INC. V. NIGH
[Syllabus]
658 MONTEREY V. DEL MONTE DUNES ATMONTEREY, LTD.
[Syllabus]
658
[Syllabus]
658
[Syllabus]
633 UNICODE VALUE='8195'>KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD. V. REGAL-BELOIT CORP.
[Syllabus]
633 COHEN V. DE LA CRUZ, 523 U.S. 213 (1998)
[Syllabus]
633 ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORP. V. RASH ET UX., 117 S.CT. 1879, 138 L.ED.2D (1997)
[Syllabus]
633
[Syllabus]
633 HADDLE V. GARRISON
[Syllabus]
603 CARTER V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether bank larceny, 18 U.S.C. 2113(b) (Supp.IV 1998), is a lesser included offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. 2113 (a)."
603
[Syllabus]
603 WEST COVINA V. PERKINS
[Syllabus]
603 UNITED STATES V. KOKINDA, 497 U.S. 720 (1990)
[Syllabus]
603 UNITED STATES V. ESTATE OF ROMANII, 523 U.S. 517 (1998)
[Syllabus]
603
[Syllabus]
603
[Syllabus]
603
[Syllabus]
570 BOGGS V. BOGGS, 520 U.S. 833 (1997).
[Syllabus]
570 UNITED STATES V. RAMIREZ, 523 U.S. 65 (1998)
[Syllabus]
570
[Syllabus]
570 TILL V. SCS CREDIT CORP.
[Syllabus]
534 MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND SUPPORT FOR ARMEDFORCES OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V.ELAHI
[Syllabus]
534 BROWN V. LEGAL FOUNDATION OF WASH.
[Syllabus]
Interest earned on client funds deposited in IOLTA accounts that is transferred to a different owner for a legitimate public use may constitute a per se taking requiring "just compensation" to the client under the Fifth Amendment; but because such compensation is measured by the owner's pecuniary interest, which is zero whenever Washington's IOLTA law is obeyed, there is no violation of the Just Compensation Clause here.
534 BABBITT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR V. YOUPEE, 519 U.S. 234 (1997).
[Syllabus]
534 SKILLING V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
534
[Syllabus]
534 C.I.R. V. ESTATE OF HUBERT, 520 U.S. 93 (1997)
[Syllabus]
534
[Syllabus]
534 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC. V. NATIONALFOOTBALL LEAGUE
[Syllabus]
534 AMERICAN MFRS. MUT. INS. CO. V. SULLIVAN
[Syllabus]
534 ALASKA V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
534
[Syllabus]
534 COLLEGE SAVINGS BANK V. FLORIDA PREPAIDPOSTSECONDARY ED. EXPENSE BD.
[Syllabus]
534 TIMMONS V. TWIN CITIES AREA NEW PARTY, 520 U.S. 351 (1997)
[Syllabus]
534 KNIGHT V. COMMISSIONER
[Syllabus]
534
[Syllabus]
534 LIBRETTI V. UNITED STATES, 516 U.S. 29 (1995).
[Syllabus]
534 NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK, 523 U.S. 767 (1998)
[Syllabus]
534 UNITED STATES V. BAJAKAJIAN, 524 U.S. 321 (1998)
[Syllabus]
534 LIMTIACO V. CAMACHO
[Syllabus]
493 558 U.S. ____ (2009)
[Syllabus]
493 LUJAN V. G & G FIRE SPRINKLERS, INC.
[Syllabus]
Because California law affords respondent public works project subcontractor sufficient opportunity to pursue its claim for payment under its contracts in state court, the statutory scheme does not deprive respondent of due process when it authorizes the State to order withholding of such payments from the contractor if a subcontractor fails to comply with certain Labor Code requirements; permits the contractor, in turn, to withhold similar sums from the subcontractor; and permits the contractor, or his assignee, to sue the awarding body for alleged breach of the contract.
493 ALVAREZ V. SMITH
[Syllabus]
493
[Syllabus]
493 CASTLE ROCK V. GONZALES
[Syllabus]
493 BENNIS V. MICHIGAN, 517 U.S. 1163 (1996)
[Syllabus]
493
[Syllabus]
493 LEOCAL V. ASHCROFT
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 VIRGINIA V. MARYLAND
[Syllabus]
440 DUSENBERY V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
The Government's sending of notice by certified mail of a cash forfeiture to petitioner's place of incarceration satisfied his due process rights.
440 REPUBLIC OF PHILIPPINES V. PIMENTEL
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 FIDELITY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. V. FINK, 522 U.S. 221 (1998)
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 ALI V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
[Syllabus]
440 UNITED STATES V. URSERY, 518 U.S. 267 (1996).
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 COLUMBUS V. OURS GARAGE & WRECKERSERVICE, INC.
[Syllabus]
49 U. S. C. §14501(c)(2)(A)-which excepts "the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles" from §14501(c)(1)'s general rule preempting prescriptions by "a State [or] political subdivision of a State . . . related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property"-does not bar a State from delegating to municipalities and other local units the State's authority to establish safety regulations governing motor carriers of property, including tow trucks.
440 JONES V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether , in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and the interpretive rule that constitutionally doubtful constructions should be avoided, see DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 (1988), Section 844(I) applies to the arson of a private residence: and if so, whether its application to the private residence in the present case is constitutional."
440 KELO V. NEW LONDON
[Syllabus]
440 WYOMING V. HOUGHTON
[Syllabus]
440
[Syllabus]
440 PASQUANTINO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
380 CITY OF SHERRILL V. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF N.Y.
[Syllabus]
380 CALIFORNIA V. DEEP SEA RESEARCH, INC., 523 U.S. 491 (1998)
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380 BOULWARE V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380 ARKANSAS ED. TELEVISION COMM'N V. FORBES, 523 U.S. 666 (1997)
[Syllabus]
380 HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS. CO. V. UNIONPLANTERS BANK, N. A.
[Syllabus]
Does a postpetition administrative creditor in a bankruptcy case have standing under 11 U.S.C. 506© to seek payment of its administrative claim from property of the bankruptcy estate that is encumbered by a secured creditor's lien?"
380 BRIDGE V. PHOENIX BOND & INDEMNITY CO.
[Syllabus]
380 FLORIDA PREPAID POSTSECONDARY ED. EXPENSEBD. V. COLLEGE SAVINGS BANK
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380 FRANCONIA ASSOCIATES  V.  UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Because the enactment of the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987 qualified as a repudiation, rather than a present breach, of the immediate-prepayment provision of petitioners' loan agreements with the Farmers Home Administration, breach would occur, and 28 U. S. C. §2501's six-year limitations period would commence to run, when a borrower tenders prepayment and the Government then dishonors its obligation to accept the tender and release its control over use of the property securing the loan.
380 GRUPO MEXICANO DE DESARROLLO, S. A. V. ALLIANCE BOND FUND, INC.
[Syllabus]
380 SUITUM V. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, 520 U.S. 725 (1997)
[Syllabus]
380 EASTERN ENTERPRISES V. APFEL, 524 U.S. 498 (1998)
[Syllabus]
380 GRABLE & SONS METAL PRODUCTS, INC. V. DARUEENGINEERING & MFG.
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
380 UNITED STATES V. WILLIAMS, 514 U.S. 527 (1995).
[Syllabus]
380
[Syllabus]
300 ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. V. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION, 504 U.S. 768 (1992).
[Syllabus]
300 UNITED STATES V. BANKS
[Syllabus]
Whether law enforcement officers executing a warrant to search for illegal drugs violated the Fourth Amendment and 18 U.S.C. 3109, thereby requiring suppression of evidence, when they forcibly entered a small apartment in the middle of the afternoon 15-20 seconds after knocking and announcing their presence.
300
[Syllabus]
300 TENNESSEE STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION V. HOOD
[Syllabus]
300 IDAHO V. COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, 117 S.CT. 2028, 138 L.ED.2D 438 (1997).
[Syllabus]
300 BEDROC LIMITED, LLC V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether sand and gravel are “valuable minerals” reserved to the United States in land grants issued under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919?
300 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTHSERVS. V. GUARDIANSHIP ESTATE OF KEFFELER
[Syllabus]
Washington State's use of respondent foster children's Social Security benefits to reimburse the State for expenses in caring for respondents did not violate 42 U. S. C. §407(a).
300 GROH V. RAMIREZ
[Syllabus]
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit properly ruled that a law enforcement officer violated clearly established law, and thus was personally liable in damages and not entitled to qualified immunity, when at the time he acted there was no decision by the Supreme Court or any other court so holding, and the only lower court decisions addressing the issue had found the same conduct did not violate the law?
300 GONZALES V. DUENAS-ALVAREZ
[Syllabus]
300 TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY CO. OF AMERICA V.PACIFIC GAS & ELEC. CO.
[Syllabus]
300 MEGHRIG ET AL. V. KFC WESTERN, INC., 516 U.S. 479 (1996).
[Syllabus]
300 SALAZAR V. BUONO
[Syllabus]
300
[Syllabus]
300 J. E. M. AG SUPPLY, INC. V. PIONEER HI-BREDINTERNATIONAL, INC.
[Syllabus]
Utility patents may be issued for newly developed plant breeds under 35 U. S. C. §101; neither the Plant Variety Protection Act nor the Plant Patent Act of 1930 limits the scope of §101's coverage.
300
[Syllabus]
300 DEPARTMENT OF ARMY V. BLUE FOX, INC.
[Syllabus]
300 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIORUNIV. V.ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
[Syllabus]
300 BOEING CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Title 26 CFR §1.861-8(e)(3) (1979)-which governs allocation of research and development expenses in computing taxable income from export sales entitled to special tax treatment under Internal Revenue Code provisions pertaining to "domestic international sales corporations" and "foreign sales corporations"-is a proper exercise of the Secretary of the Treasury's rulemaking authority.
300 RIVET V. REGIONS BANK OF LA., 522 U.S. 470 (1998)
[Syllabus]
300 PLEASANT GROVE CITY V. SUMMUM
[Syllabus]
300
[Syllabus]
300 EMPIRE HEALTHCHOICE ASSURANCE, INC. V. MCVEIGH
[Syllabus]
300
[Syllabus]
300 ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION V.WINN
[Syllabus]
300 MARRAMA V. CITIZENS BANK OF MASS.
[Syllabus]
300 SARATOGA FISHING CO. V. J. M. MARTINAC & CO., 520 U.S. 875 (1997)
[Syllabus]
300
[Syllabus]
300
[Syllabus]
300 ENGQUIST V. OREGON DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
[Syllabus]
300 SCHENCK V. PRO CHOICE NETWORK, 519 U.S. 357 (1997).
[Syllabus]
300 UNITED STATES V. JICARILLA APACHE NATION
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 CENTRAL VA. COMMUNITY COLLEGE V. KATZ
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 BECK V. PRUPIS
[Syllabus]
Whether an employee who is terminated for both blowing the whistle on and refusing to participate in a pattern of predicated acts of racketeering forbidden by the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act (""RICO""), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq., may assert a civil RICO conspiracy claim, where he has been injured by an overt act in furtherance of the RICO conspiracy, which overt act is not, itself, a predicate act of racketeering (a question as to which the circuit courts of appeal are in direct conflict).
190
[Syllabus]
190 SNYDER V. PHELPS
[Syllabus]
190 MINNESOTA V. CARTER, 525 U.S. 83 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 CITY OF BOERNE V. FLORES, 117 S.CT. 2157, 138 L.ED.2D 624 (1997).
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 UNITED STATES V. MORRISON
[Syllabus]
1. Whether 42 U.S.C. 13981, the provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 that creates a private right of action for victims of gender-motivated violence, is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. 2. Whether 42 U.S.C. 13981 is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Enforcement Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
190
[Syllabus]
190 NEW JERSEY V. DELAWARE
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 LUNDING V. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL, 522 U.S. 287 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190 LACHANCE V. ERICKSON, 522 U.S. 262 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190 INS V. AGUIRRE-AGUIRRE
[Syllabus]
190 ASGROW SEED CO. V. WINTERBOER, 513 U.S. 179 (1995).
[Syllabus]
190 ALASKA V. NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, 522 U.S. 520 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190 UNITED STATES V. FLORES-MONTANO
[Syllabus]
Whether, under the 4th Amendment, customs officers at the international border must have reasonable suspicion in order to remove, disassemble, and search a vehicle's gas tank for contraband?
190 WATCHTOWER BIBLE & TRACT SOC. OF N. Y., INC. V.VILLAGE OF STRATTON
[Syllabus]
A village ordinance making it a misdemeanor to engage in door-to-door advocacy without first registering with the mayor and receiving a permit violates the First Amendment as it applies to religious proselytizing, anonymous political speech, and the distribution of handbills.
190 MARTINEZ V. COURT OF APPEAL OF CAL.,FOURTH APPELLATE DIST.
[Syllabus]
Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to elect self-representation on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction?
190 REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA V. ALTMANN
[Syllabus]
Does the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) confer jurisdiction in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California over the Republic of Austria and the state-owned Austrian Gallery in a suit alleging wrongful appropriation of six Gustav Klimt paintings from their rightful heirs?
190 MEADWESTVACO CORP. V. ILLINOIS DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 M. L. B. V. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
[Syllabus]
190 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INS. CO. V. KNUDSON
[Syllabus]
Because petitioners are seeking legal relief-the imposition of personal liability on respondents for a contractual obligation to pay money-this action is not authorized by §502(a)(3) of ERISA, which prescribes a suit for "appropriate equitable relief."
190 PHILIP MORRIS USA V. WILLIAMS
[Syllabus]
190 DOLAN V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
190 DAVENPORT V. WASHINGTON ED. ASSN.
[Syllabus]
190 EC TERM OF YEARS TRUST V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 KONTRICK V. RYAN
[Syllabus]
190 VIRGINIA V. BLACK
[Syllabus]
Does the Virginia statute that bans cross burning with intent to intimidate violate the First Amendment, even though the statute reaches all such intimidation and is not limited to any racial, religious or other content-focused category?
190
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 BARNHART V. PEABODY COAL CO.
[Syllabus]
Although the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 provides that the Commissioner of Social Security "shall, before October 1, 1993," assign each coal industry retiree eligible for benefits to an extant operator or related entity, initial assignments made after that date are valid despite their untimeliness.
190 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
190 ATLANTIC MUT. INS. CO. V. COMMISSIONER, 523 U.S. 382 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 MV. CHICAGO
[Syllabus]
190 SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Whether petitioner's policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Establishment Clause."
190 RANCHO PALOS VERDES V. ABRAMS
[Syllabus]
190 EGELHOFF V. EGELHOFF
[Syllabus]
The Washington statute that provides that the designation of a spouse as the beneficiary of a nonprobate asset is revoked automatically upon divorce has a connection with ERISA plans and is therefore expressly pre-empted by ERISA.
190 SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. V. APCC SERVICES, INC.
[Syllabus]
190 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOC. CHAPTER OF UNIV. OF CAL.,HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW V. MARTINEZ
[Syllabus]
190 CBOCS WEST, INC. V. HUMPHRIES
[Syllabus]
190 JERMAN V. CARLISLE, MCNELLIE, RINI,KRAMER & ULRICH LPA
[Syllabus]
190 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL V. BABBITT
[Syllabus]
1. Destroy the protection and priority statutorily accorded to adjudicated rights to graze livestock on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, by replacing established ""grazing preferences"" with variable ""permitted uses"", 2. Provide that the United States in the future will have title to structural range improvements made and paid for by grazing permittees: and 3. Allow grazing permits to be issued to persons not ""engaged the livestock business."""
190 GOMEZ-PEREZ V. POTTER
[Syllabus]
190 JOHNSON V. FANKELL, 520 U.S. 911 (1997).
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 BILSKI V. KAPPOS
[Syllabus]
190 STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.V. CAMPBELL
[Syllabus]
Whether the Utah Supreme Court, in direct contravention of this Court's decision in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S.559 (1996), and fundamental principles of due process, committed constitutional error by reinstating a $145 million punitive damage award that punishes out-of-state conduct, is 145 time greater than the compensatory damages in the case, and is based upon the defendant's alleged business practices nationwide over a twenty year period, which were unrelated and dissimilar to the conduct by the defendant that gave rise to the plaintiff's claims?
190 MONSANTO CO. V. GEERTSON SEED FARMS
[Syllabus]
190 DUNN V. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, 519 U.S. 465 (1997).
[Syllabus]
190 UNITED STATES V. O'HAGAN, 117 S.CT. 2199, 138 L.ED.2D 724 (1997).
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 J. MV. NICASTRO
[Syllabus]
190 UNITED STATES V. CABRALES, 524 U.S. 1 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 HUDSON V. MICHIGAN
[Syllabus]
190 GUTIERREZ DE MARTINEZ V. LAMAGNO, 515 U.S. 417 (1995).
[Syllabus]
190 WILL V. HALLOCK
[Syllabus]
190 ILLINOIS V. MCARTHUR
[Syllabus]
Whether it is constitutionally reasonable for police officers to secure a residence from the outside, and prohibit the occupant's entry into that residence for a short time while they obtain a search warrant based on probable cause, when this Court has suggested that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment in Segura v. United States 468 U.S. 796, 82 L.Ed.2d 599, 104 S.Ct. 3380 (1984) and other courts have found similar behavior consistent with the Fourth Amendment, and Segura."
190 CRAWFORD-EL V. BRITTON, 523 U.S. 574 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190 CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS, LTD. V. KING
[Syllabus]
The RICO provision forbidding "any person employed by or associated with any enterprise . . . to conduct or participate . . . in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity," 18 U. S. C. §1962(c), applies when a corporate employee unlawfully conducts the affairs of the corporation of which he is the sole owner-whether he conducts those affairs within the scope, or beyond the scope, of corporate authority.
190 CELOTEX CORP. V. EDWARDS, 514 U.S. 300 (1995).
[Syllabus]
190 KENNEDY V. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR DUPONT SAV. AND INVESTMENT PLAN
[Syllabus]
190 SOUTH DAKOTA V. YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, 522 U.S. 329 (1998)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
[Syllabus]
190 SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. ALABAMA
[Syllabus]
190 ROSENBERGER V. UNIVERSITY OF VA., 515 U.S. 819 (1995).
[Syllabus]
190 DEGEN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 820 (1996).
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 561 U.S. ____ (2010)
[Syllabus]
190 JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 520 U.S. 461 (1997).
[Syllabus]
190 VAN ORDEN V. PERRY
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 OHIO V. AKRON CENTER, 497 U.S. 502 (1990)
[Syllabus]
190 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. V. FCC
[Syllabus]
The Federal Communications Commission can require state utility commissions to set the rates charged for leased telecommunications network elements on a forward-looking basis untied to the network owners' investment, and can require those owners to combine such elements upon the request of a leasing competitor that cannot do the combining itself.
190 SALINAS V. UNITED STATES, 522 U.S. 52 (1997)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 JAMES V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
190 CAPITOL SQUARE REVIEW BD. V. PINETTE, 515 U.S. 753 (1995).
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 KANSAS ET AL. V UTILICORP UNITED, INC., 497 U.S. 199 (1990)
[Syllabus]
190 RICHARDS ET AL. V. JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, ET AL., 517 U.S. 793 (1996).
[Syllabus]
190 ERIE V. PAPS A. M.
[Syllabus]
Did the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the court of last resort of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, improperly strike an ordinance of the City of Erie which fully comports with the principles articulated in Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., thereby willfully disregarding binding precedent in violation of the Supremacy Clause at Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States?
190 EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER
[Syllabus]
190 C & L ENTERPRISES, INC. V. CITIZEN BANDPOTAWATOMI TRIBE OF OKLA.SYLLABUS
[Syllabus]
Under the agreement respondent Tribe proposed and signed, the Tribe clearly consented to arbitration and to the enforcement of arbitral awards in Oklahoma state court; the Tribe thereby waived its sovereign immunity from petitioner contractor's state-court suit to enforce its arbitration award.
190 DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC,., ET AL. V. F.C.C., 518 U.S. 727 (1996)
[Syllabus]
190
[Syllabus]
190 FDA V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.
[Syllabus]
Whether, given FDA's findings, tobacco products are subject to regulation under the Act as ""drugs"" and ""devices.