skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query railroad returned 33 results.

1000 METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD CO. V. BUCKLEY, 521 U.S. 424 (1997)
[Syllabus]
1000 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATIONV. MORGAN
[Syllabus]
A plaintiff raising claims of discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must file his charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within the appropriate 180- or 300-day statutory filing period, but a charge alleging a hostile work environment will not be time barred if all acts constituting the claim are part of the same unlawful practice and at least one act falls within the filing period; in neither instance is a court precluded from applying equitable doctrines that may toll or limit the time period.
1000 UNITED STATES. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD V. FRITZ
[Concurrence]
1000 ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS
[Syllabus]
1000 UNITED STATES. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD V. FRITZ
[Opinion]
1000 ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS
[Opinion]
1000 UNITED STATES. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD V. FRITZ
[Dissent]
1000 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS V. PULLMAN COMPANY
[Opinion]
1000 ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS
[Concur in part, dissent in part]
1000 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS V. PULLMAN COMPANY
[Syllabus]
1000 ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. TOMPKINS
[Concur in part, dissent in part]
1000 UNITED STATES. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD V. FRITZ
[Syllabus]
1000 METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD CO. V. BUCKLEY, 521 U.S. 424 (1997)
[Syllabus]
962 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATIONV. MORGAN
[Syllabus]
A plaintiff raising claims of discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 must file his charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within the appropriate 180- or 300-day statutory filing period, but a charge alleging a hostile work environment will not be time barred if all acts constituting the claim are part of the same unlawful practice and at least one act falls within the filing period; in neither instance is a court precluded from applying equitable doctrines that may toll or limit the time period.
843 NORFOLK SOUTHERN R. CO. V. SORRELL
[Syllabus]
843
[Syllabus]
782 LEBRON V. NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP., 513 U.S. 374 (1995).
[Syllabus]
782 CSX TRANSP., INC. V. GEORGIA STATE BD. OFEQUALIZATION
[Syllabus]
782 NORFOLK & WESTERN R. CO. V. AYERS
[Syllabus]
Mental anguish damages resulting from the fear of developing cancer may be recovered under the Federal Employers' Liability Act by a railroad worker suffering from the actionable injury asbestosis caused by work-related exposure to asbestos; the FELA's express terms, reinforced by consistent judicial applications of the Act, allow such a worker to recover his entire damages from a railroad whose negligence jointly caused his injury, thus placing on the railroad the burden of seeking contribution from other potential tortfeasors.
744 BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE R. CO.,, 516 U.S. 152 (1996)
[Syllabus]
704 NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO. V. HILES, 516 U.S. 400 (1996).
[Syllabus]
659
[Syllabus]
659
[Syllabus]
659 CSX TRANSP., INC. V. MCBRIDE
[Syllabus]
608 NORFOLK SOUTHERN R. CO. V. SHANKLIN
[Syllabus]
Whether the court of appeals properly applied this Court's decision in CSX Transportation, Inc. V. Easterwood, 507 U.S. 658 (1993), when it held, in acknowledged conflict with decisions of three other circuits, that claims of negligence based on inadeguate warning devices at a railway grade crossing are not preempted even through the warning devices at the crossing were installed with federal funds under a project approved by the federal government."
608 BURLINGTON N. & S. F. R. CV. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
469 CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. ADAMS
[Syllabus]
Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act-which excludes from that Act's coverage "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce"-exempts the employment contracts of transportation workers, but not other employment contracts.
469
[Syllabus]
469 558 U. S. ____ (2009)
[Syllabus]
370 IDAHO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
The National Government holds title, in trust for the Coeur d'Alene Tribe, to lands underlying portions of Lake Coeur d'Alene and the St. Joe River.
370 STEEL CO. V. CITIZENS FOR BETTER ENVIRONMENT, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)
[Syllabus]
370 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. V. ALABAMA DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
234 UNICODE VALUE='8195'>KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD. V. REGAL-BELOIT CORP.
[Syllabus]
234 LEDBETTER V. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.
[Syllabus]
234 MEADWESTVACO CORP. V. ILLINOIS DEPT. OFREVENUE
[Syllabus]
234 JEFFERSON V. CITY OF TARRANT, ALA., 522 U.S. 75 (1997)
[Syllabus]
234 FREE ENTERPRISE FUND V. PUBLIC COMPANYACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BD.
[Syllabus]
234
[Syllabus]
234 NORFOLK SOUTHERN R. CO. V. JAMES N. KIRBY,PTY LTD.
[Syllabus]
234
[Syllabus]
234 SAN REMO HOTEL, L. P. V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SANFRANCISCO
[Syllabus]
234 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. V.METROPHONES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
[Syllabus]
234
[Syllabus]
234 CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMN
[Syllabus]
234
[Syllabus]