skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query schools returned 52 results.

1000 PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V.SEATTLE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1
[Syllabus]
1000 FRANKLIN V. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
[Opinion]
1000 FRANKLIN V. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
[Syllabus]
1000 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. MERGENS BY AND THROUGH MERGENS
[Dissent]
1000 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. MERGENS BY AND THROUGH MERGENS
[Opinion]
1000 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. MERGENS BY AND THROUGH MERGENS
[Concurrence]
1000 FRANKLIN V. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
[Concurrence]
1000 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. MERGENS BY AND THROUGH MERGENS
[Syllabus]
1000 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WESTSIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V. MERGENS BY AND THROUGH MERGENS
[Concurrence]
1000 PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS V.SEATTLE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1
[Syllabus]
942 ZELMAN V. SIMMONS-HARRIS
[Syllabus]
Ohio's Pilot Project Scholarship Program, which provides, inter alia, tuition aid for Cleveland schoolchildren to attend a participating public or private, religious or nonreligious, school of their parent's choosing, does not offend the Establishment Clause.
908 MITCHELL V. HELMS
[Syllabus]
Whether a program under Chapter 2 of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 7301, et seq., which provides federal funds to state and local education agencies to purchase and lend neutral, secular, and nonreligious materials such as computers, software, and library books to public and nonpublic schools for use by the students attending those schools, and which allocates the funds on an equal per-student basis, regardless of the religious or secular character of the schools the students choose to attend, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
810
[Syllabus]
593 SCHAFFER V. WEAST
[Syllabus]
593 BRENTWOOD ACADEMY V. TENNESSEE SECONDARYSCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSN.
[Syllabus]
Whether the regulatory conduct of a nominally private secondary school athletic association, which ""establishes and enforces all of the rules by which high school teams and players, at both public and private schools, compete throughout the state of Tennessee,"" Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School athletic Ass'n, 190 F.3rd 705 (6th Cir. 1999) (Merritt, J., dissenting from the denial of petition for rehearing en banc), and whose ""membership consist(s) entirely of institutions located within the same State, many of them public institutions created by the same sovereign, "" NCAA v. Tarkanian, 488 U.S. 179, 193 n. 13 (1988), constitutes state action under the Fourteenth Amendment and under 42 U.S.C. 1983."
593
[Syllabus]
555 OWASSO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. I011V. FALVO
[Syllabus]
Peer grading-where students score each other's tests, papers, and assignments as the teacher explains the correct answers to the class-does not violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974's prohibition on the release of education records without parental consent.
555 ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION V.WINN
[Syllabus]
555 AGOSTINI V. FELTON, 117 S.CT. 1997, 138 L.ED.2D 391 (1997).
[Syllabus]
512 MORSE V. FREDERICK
[Syllabus]
512
[Syllabus]
458 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOC. CHAPTER OF UNIV. OF CAL.,HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW V. MARTINEZ
[Syllabus]
458
[Syllabus]
458 BOARD OF ED. OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.NO. 92 OF POTTAWATOMIE CTY. V. EARLS
[Syllabus]
Petitioner school district's drug testing policy for students participating in extracurricular activities is a reasonable means of furthering the district's important interest in preventing and deterring drug use among its schoolchildren and does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
458 HIBBS V. WINN
[Syllabus]
458 MISSOURI V. JENKINS, 515 U.S. 70 (1995).
[Syllabus]
458 FITZGERALD V. BARNSTABLE SCHOOL COMM.
[Syllabus]
395 DAVIS V. MONROE COUNTY BD. OF ED.
[Syllabus]
312 FOREST GROVE SCHOOL DIST. V. T. A.
[Syllabus]
312 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSN. V. SMITH
[Syllabus]
312 GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER
[Syllabus]
1. Does the University of Michigan Law School's use of racial preferences in student admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C> 2000d), or 42 U.S.C. 1981? 2. Should an appellate court required to apply strict scrutiny to governmental race-based preferences review de novo the district court's findings because the fact issues are constitutional?
312 TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSN. V.BRENTWOOD ACADEMY
[Syllabus]
197 LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPT. V. UNITED REPORTINGPUBLISHING CORP.
[Syllabus]
Whether the government violates the First Amendment when it releases records but forbids their commercial use?
197 GEBSER V. LAGO VISTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST., 524 U.S. 274 (1998)
[Syllabus]
197 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL ED. AND RESEARCH V.UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
197 SNYDER V. LOUISIANA
[Syllabus]
197 SABRI V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
Whether Sabri is entitled to dismissal of the indictment charging him with three counts of bribery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 666(a)(2), on the ground that the statute is facially unconstitutional because Congress lacks the power to make bribery of a local official a federal crime without federal funds being at risk?
197
[Syllabus]
197 HORNE V.FLORES
[Syllabus]
197 ASHCROFT V. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
[Syllabus]
Whether the Child Online Protection Act violates the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
197 GOMEZ-PEREZ V. POTTER
[Syllabus]
197 SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Whether petitioner's policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Establishment Clause."
197 UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA ET AL., 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
[Syllabus]
197 LANE V. PENA, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL., 518 U.S. 187 (1996).
[Syllabus]
197 550 U.S. ____ (2007)
[Syllabus]
197 SOSSAMON V. TEXAS
[Syllabus]
197 NASA V. NELSON
[Syllabus]
197 SOUTH DAKOTA V. YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, 522 U.S. 329 (1998)
[Syllabus]
197 BARNES V. GORMAN
[Syllabus]
Punitive damages may not be awarded in private suits brought under §202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and §504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
197 VAN ORDEN V. PERRY
[Syllabus]
197 HEIN V. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
[Syllabus]
197 BATES V. UNITED STATES, 522 U.S. 23 (1997)
[Syllabus]
197 JACKSON V. BIRMINGHAM BD. OF ED.
[Syllabus]
197
[Syllabus]
197 GONZAGA UNIV. V. DOE
[Syllabus]
Respondent's action is foreclosed because the relevant provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 create no personal rights to enforce under 42 U. S. C. §1983.
197 LEVIN V. COMMERCE ENERGY, INC.
[Syllabus]
197 LOCKE V. DAVEY
[Syllabus]
The Washington Constitution provides that no public money shall be appropriated or applied to religious instruction. Following this constitutional command, Washington does not grant college scholarships to otherwise eligible students who are pursuing a degree in theology. Does the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment require the state to fund religious instruction, if it provides college scholarships for secular instruction?
197
[Syllabus]
197 SNYDER V. LOUISIANA
[Syllabus]
197 TEXAS V. UNITED STATES, 523 U.S. 296 (1998)
[Syllabus]
197 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
[Syllabus]