skip navigation
search

Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Your query securities returned 50 results.

1000 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC V. BILLING
[Syllabus]
1000 NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Opinion]
1000 NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Concurrence]
1000 NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
1000 NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Dissent]
1000 NORTHERN SECURITIES CO. V. UNITED STATES
[Dissent]
1000 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC V. BILLING
[Syllabus]
849 SEC V. ZANDFORD
[Syllabus]
Assuming that the allegations in the SEC's complaint are true, respondent's alleged fraudulent conduct-selling his customer's securities and using the proceeds for his own benefit without the customer's knowledge or consent-was "in connection with the purchase or sale of any security" within the meaning of §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the SEC's Rule 10b-5.
800
[Syllabus]
760 UNITED STATES V. O'HAGAN, 117 S.CT. 2199, 138 L.ED.2D 724 (1997).
[Syllabus]
760
[Syllabus]
760 SEC V. EDWARDS
[Syllabus]
Whether the Court of appeals erred in dismissing the complaint on the ground that an investment scheme is excluded from the term investment contract in the definitions of ''securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10), if the promoter promises a fixed rather than variable return or if the investor is contractually entitled to a particular amount or rate of return.
739
[Syllabus]
716 MORRISON V. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD.
[Syllabus]
664 ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INC. V. HALLIBURTON CO.
[Syllabus]
664
[Syllabus]
664 DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. V. BROUDO
[Syllabus]
560
[Syllabus]
560 WHARF (HOLDINGS) LTD. V. UNITED INT’LHOLDINGS, INC. SYLLABUS
[Syllabus]
A company that sells an option to buy stock while secretly intending never to honor the option violates §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits using "any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance" "in connection with the purchase or sale of any security."
560 STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V.SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC.
[Syllabus]
517
[Syllabus]
517 TELLABS, INC. V. MAKOR ISSUES & RIGHTS, LTD.
[Syllabus]
462 GUSTAFSON V. ALLOYD CO., 513 U.S. 561 (1995).
[Syllabus]
462
[Syllabus]
462 MERCK & CO. V. REYNOLDS
[Syllabus]
462 MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC. V. SIRACUSANO
[Syllabus]
398 FREE ENTERPRISE FUND V. PUBLIC COMPANYACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BD.
[Syllabus]
398 KIRCHER V. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST
[Syllabus]
315
[Syllabus]
315
[Syllabus]
315 PLAUT V. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., 514 U.S. 211 (1995).
[Syllabus]
315 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KY. V. DAVIS
[Syllabus]
315 JANUS CAPITAL GROUP, INC. V. FIRST DERIVATIVE TRADERS
[Syllabus]
315 MATSUSHITA ELEC. INDUS. CO., LTD., ET AL. V. EPSTEIN ET AL., 516 U.S. 367 (1996)
[Syllabus]
315 SKILLING V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
315
[Syllabus]
199 561 U. S. ____ (2010)
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 HOWSAM V. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.
[Syllabus]
A National Association of Securities Dealers arbitrator, rather than a court, should apply the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure's time limit rule to a client's dispute with a broker.
199 NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMIN. V. FIRST NAT. BANK & TRUST CO., 522 U.S. 479 (1998)
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 NATIONSBANK OF N.C. V. VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INS. CO., 513 U.S. 251 (1995).
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 WATTERS V. WACHOVIA BANK, N. A.
[Syllabus]
199 LUJAN V. NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, 497 U.S. 871 (1990)
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 MASTROBUONO V. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., 514 U.S. 52 (1995).
[Syllabus]
199 HUMANA INC. V. FORSYTH
[Syllabus]
199 JONES V. HARRIS ASSOCIATES L. P.
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 HEMI GROUP, LLC V. CITY OF NEW YORK
[Syllabus]
199
[Syllabus]
199 UNITED STATES V. ESTATE OF ROMANII, 523 U.S. 517 (1998)
[Syllabus]
199 YEAGER V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]